Thursday 17 October 2013

No concealment penalty if claim for bad debt losses was rejected on legal grounds and not on wrong f

IT: Where loss in respect of bad debt written off on account of loan given to a subsidiary company, was rejected in view of legal position, which was against assessee, and not because of statement of incorrect or wrong facts, penalty could not be levied


Application for condonation of delay can’t be rejected without granting an opportunity of being hear

ST : Though condonation cannot be claimed as a right and it depends on facts of each case but substantial justice is required to be done and door of litigant cannot be closed by merely rejecting condonation application in a cursory manner; authorities must provide an opportunity of being heard to assessee before rejecting application


FinMin worried over tax mop -up

After getting some comfort on the current account deficit with a rise in exports, the finance ministry is now worried about revenue, crucial for containing the fiscal deficit at 4.8 per cent of gross domestic product, its outer target.


As tax collections were subdued in the first half of the financial year, it has planned to issue instructions to field officers to take all possible measures to meet their Budget target.


The revenue department’s worry is that in many cases taxpayers have taken credit for the tax already paid by them on inputs, thus reducing their net cash outgo. The Central Board of Excise and Customs (CBEC) might ask field officers to do a special audit in such cases.


Finance Minister P Chidambaram will soon brainstorm with top revenue officials on what to do. The CBEC brass is to meet on Friday in this regard. Besides special audits, other measures could include notices to non-filers and stop-filers, recovery of arrears and fast settlement of disputes, among others.


“This time, the tax credit has been more than cash payment. It could be because of expansion by companies, particularly in capital-intensive sectors, but this might not be true in all the cases. We are trying to figure out why this happened,” said a ministry official who did not wish to be identified.

The official said the ratio of tax credit to cash payment was 35:65 a decade earlier; now, this had reversed. Tax credit of about Rs 2.5 lakh crore was given last year. So far this year, tax credit of Rs 1,72,000 crore has been taken, while cash payments are Rs 62,107 crore.


The growth in tax receipts during the first half of this year has been lower than the 19 per cent projected in the Budget for the entire year, as GDP growth is less than expected.


Indirect taxes are particularly bothering the government, as excise collections till August were 8.3 per cent down due to weak industrial output, against the Budget Estimate of 11.9 per cent growth for the year. Service tax collections, though up, have also grown at a much lesser pace of 14.3 per cent against the asking rate of 36 per cent.


Collection from customs duty during April-August recorded 9.6 per cent growth over the same period of last year. This is lower than the Budget projection of 13 per cent for 2013-14.


Officials said in September some pick-up was seen, as industrial output grew by 2.7 per cent in July and 0.6 per cent in August. There is a lag effect of one to two months between the two sets of data.


The ministry is expecting collections to pick up in the coming months, led by a growth in industrial output in July and August after a two-month contraction, stimulus to the automobile and consumer durables sector by way of additional capital to banks and higher GDP growth in the last two quarters.


Another silver lining is the coming Assembly elections in five states, which would increase fuel consumption.

Net direct tax collections in April-September were up 10.7 per cent at Rs 250,959 crore, compared with Rs 226,653 crore in the same period of 2012-13.


The government has set a target of Rs 668,109 crore for direct taxes this year, against the BE of Rs 570,257 crore last year. For indirect taxes, the target is Rs 565,002 crore in 2013-14, against last year’s BE of Rs 505,044 crore. In 2012-13, both direct and indirect tax collections fell short of the target and the Revised Estimate was set at Rs 565,835 crore and Rs 469,546 crore, respectively, a rise of 17.4 per cent over the previous year.





E-sampark centres not taking downloaded property tax forms

Residents who went to e-sampark centre in some sectors for submitting property tax on residential property had to face problems with forms downloaded from the internet not being accepted. Instead the residents were asked to take forms from the sampark centres and fill these up.


Property tax on residential property has recently been introduced in Chandigarh. The tax is to be submitted from October 14 to December 14. Thereafter, a fine would be imposed on the defaulters that would be added to the water bills. The tax has been imposed at the rate of Rs 1 per sq yard.

A resident of Sector 44 said that he downloaded the form from the website of the Municipal Corporation and filled it. However, when he went to the e-sampark centre, he was told that he would have to fill the form available at the centre and the ones downloaded will not be accepted. A similar experience was shared by others at the sampark centre.


Joint Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Rajiv Gupta said that the e-sampark centres are supposed to accept the downloaded forms as that is the purpose of having these on the MC website. Instructions for the same have already been issued, he said.





Entity with related party transactions of up to 25% is an 'Uncontrolled Entity', says ITAT

IT/ILT: In order to determine ALP of international transactions entered into by assessee, companies selected should be functionally comparable and not identical


INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,MUMBAI CONSTITUTION OF BENCHES FROM 21.10.2013 TO 24.10.2013

[unable to retrieve full-text content]INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,MUMBAI CONSTITUTION OF BENCHES FROM 21.10.2013 TO 24.10.2013 {ad} For more information...


Customs, Excise And Service Tax Appellate Tribunal To Have Six New Benches

17-Oct-2013


After six cities, Chandigarh, Allahabad and Hyderabad will also now have CESTAT benches, a move aimed at speedy disposal of cases related to Customs, Excise and Service Tax.



The Union Cabinet today gave its approval for setting up six additional benches of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), including three at the existing locations in New Delhi, Mumbai and Chennai and three new benches in Chandigarh, Allahabad and Hyderabad.




Kolkata, Bangalore and Ahmedabad already have one CESTAT bench each.



With these additions, nine major cities in the country now have the benches of the appellate tribunal of the three revenue departments.



The creation of additional/new benches of CESTAT would amount to a one-time expenditure of Rs 3.45 crore while the recurring expenditure would be Rs 10 crore per annum.



Official sources said after the expansion, disposal of cases will increase and pendency will decrease benefiting the government and tax payers. This would help reduce travel time and expenditure, they added.



The CESTAT benches would need creation of twelve posts of Members of the Tribunal (6 Technical and Judicial Members each) in the Higher Administrative Grade (HAG+) in addition to 98 posts of supporting staff including Deputy and Assistant Registrars.



CESTAT was set up in 1982 to provide an independent and impartial forum to hear the appeal against orders and decisions passed by the Commissioners of Customs and Excise under the Customs Act 1962, Central Excise at 1944 and Gold (Control) Act, 1968.



After coming into operation of the Service Tax vide Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994, Service Tax Appeals have been included in the jurisdiction of the tribunal.



The tribunal is also empowered to hear the appeals against the orders passed by designated authority with regard to anti-dumping duties under the Customs Tariff Act, 1975.



At present, CESTAT has three benches each in Delhi and Mumbai and one bench each at Kolkata, Chennai, Bangalore and Ahmedabad. The headquarters as well as Principal Bench of the tribunal are in Delhi.


Source:- economictimes.indiatimes.com





Worried over rising prices of CNG - Complain to Petroleum Regulatory Board rather than Competition C

Competition Act: Commission would not proceed with complaint regarding pricing of PNG when Petroleum & Natural Gas Regulatory Board was looking into grievances of consumers and pricing of CNG/PNG


Cotton Yarn Prices Fall As Demand Slows

17-Oct-2013


Cotton yarn prices have declined five-seven per cent in the past fortnight, owing to high inventory and low demand. Sources said the recent fall in yarn prices could also be attributed to a fall in cotton prices.



“Yarn prices have fallen mainly due to the fall in demand from fabric makers. A huge inventory pile-up has prompted buyers to go slow on fresh purchases. Also, cotton prices have fallen by about Rs 3,500 a candy (each of 356 kg) since mid-September,” said K Selvaraju, secretary general, Southern India Mills’ Association. On September 15, combed yarn prices had touched a high of Rs 281 a kg; now, the price stands at Rs 261 a kg. Hanked yarn prices have fallen from Rs 1,115 a bundle (each of 4.54 kg) in mid-September to Rs 1,085 a bundle.



Traders expect prices to fall further, as there is an inventory pile-up of 160 million kg. “China has almost stopped cotton yarn imports. It may be waiting for Indian yarn prices to stabilise at lower levels. But that seems unlikely before November,” said Arun Dalal, a leading cotton trader and industry expert.



The government's decision to do away with cotton yarn export benefits under the focus market scheme (FMS), has also hit exports. “The FMS was to reduce our dependence on China and explore new markets. The government's decision to withdraw the scheme has adversely affected trade,” said a miller based in Andhra Pradesh.



Sources say the government's decision to withdraw benefits under the FMS scheme was unwarranted. “There was no shortage; on the contrary, the stock is 20 per cent more than last year. Also, on a year-on-year basis, cotton prices have increased more than yarn prices,” said Selvaraju. He added cotton prices had increased by Rs 44 a kg in the past year, against the Rs 28-a-kg rise in yarn prices.



“There is an alternative of synthetic yarn. When cotton yarn prices jumped to peak levels in September, many garment buyers increased their purchase of synthetic yarn, as crude imports became cheaper with the rupee appreciating from its low levels,” said Dalal.



However, there is a silver lining for yarn traders and millers. Industry estimates suggest this year, China might not buy cotton from India. As a result, the demand for yarn may rise. Currently, about 40-50 per cent of India's yarn exports are accounted for by China.


Source:- business-standard.com





Canon May Set Up Plant In India For Exports

17-Oct-2013


Canon India is looking at setting up a manufacturing plant in India. This follows the recent initiatives taken by the Government to establish electronic hardware manufacturing clusters in the country and incentivise manufacturing.


However, the Japan-based company said it will not decide in a hurry, as it wants the facility to also be an export hub. The company, at present, imports 100 per cent of the products it sells in India.


“We have started checking the infrastructure opportunity and benefits. It is a very basic field study we are doing. According to our company policy, we are not interested in establishing a hardware factory (copier, scanners) only for the sake of that country,” Kazutada Kobayashi, President and Chief Executive Officer, Canon India, told Business Line.


He said though India is not much into electronic hardware manufacturing right now, but with the new policies in place, the country may do good in the next 10 years.


He said, when the company decides to set up a plant in India, it will produce for the export market as well, particularly the West.


“For example, our inkjet printers’ factory which has over 10,000 workers in Vietnam does not produce products only for Vietnam, but exports as well,” he said.


He said the company is doing studies on the infrastructure, parts supply (as many parts suppliers should also be in place), export and import leniency on parts and products, logistics and skilled labours.


“Logistics and quality of workers are very important, particularly because our industry is different which is known as precision machine industry, slightly different from other manufacturers such as bikes and cars,” Kobayashi said.


“The Government aims to achieve a turnover of around $400-billion from the electronic hardware industry at an investment of about $100 billion and provide employment to around 28 million by 2020.


Source:- thehindubusinessline.com





Minimum Support Price Of Wheat Raised By Rs 50 To Rs 1,400 A Quintal

Concerned about high inflation, the Centre on Thursday raised the minimum support price (MSP) of wheat by Rs 50 a quintal for the marketing year starting April 2014, rejecting an agriculture ministry proposal for a higher increase.



MSPs of other rabi crops including gram, barley and mustard have also been increased, but kept at lower ends of the recommended hike. Procurement of these crops under the new price will begin in April next year.




"Wheat MSP has been increased by Rs 50 per quintal to Rs 1,400 for 2013-14 crop year as against Rs 1,350 last year," food minister K V Thomas said after the meeting of the Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs which approved the increase as recommended by the Commission for Agriculture Costs and Prices (CACP), the government advisory body.



The CCEA rejected agriculture minister Sharad Pawar's proposal to pay farmers Rs 1,450 per quintal for wheat. Asked why the agriculture ministry's proposal wasn't accepted, Thomas said, "We are concerned about inflation. When MSP goes up, obviously prices in the open market rise and we have no control on that."



The CACP had recommended an increase of Rs 50 per quintal of wheat, keeping in view high inflation in cereals and exports becoming unviable. It felt the existing MSP was comfortably higher than the projected cost of production.



"We need to take a balanced decision of protecting both farmers and consumers. We are giving price support to farmers and not income support," Thomas said.



The CCEA also approved MSP increases for gram by Rs 100 per quintal to Rs 3,100, masur by Rs 50 per quintal to Rs 2,950 and mustard seed by Rs 50 per quintal to Rs 3,050.



The MSP of barley has been raised by Rs 120 per quintal to Rs 1,100 and safflower by Rs 200 per quintal to Rs 3,000 for 2014-15.



Inflation as measured by the wholesale price index rose to a seven-month high of 6.46% in September, while it was 9.84% as per the consumer price index amid higher prices of cereals and vegetables.



The increase in wheat MSP is likely to lead to a rise in the government's food subsidy bill in the next fiscal. Sowing of wheat starts in October and harvesting takes place from April.


Source:- http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com





Adani Ports, United Liner Among Five Bidders For Jnpt’S Liquid Terminal

Five companies, including Adani Ports and United Liner Agencies (ULA), have shown interest in constructing the Rs 1,800-crore liquid terminal for the Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust (JNPT), its chairmanin-charge NN Kumar told ET.



Apart from ULA and Adani, Aegis Logistics, IMC and Netherlands's Vopak are expected to submit their applications on October 21, which is the deadline, said Kumar.



"The terminal will handle edible oil, chemicals, liquid fertilisers as well as petroleum, oil and lubricants (POL)," said NN Kumar. "There is a great demand for handling chemical and edible oil. Mumbai Port Trust primarily handles POL (petroleum, oil and lubricants)," he added.



The liquid terminal, which will handle 15.5 million tonnes per annum and is expected to be built in two phases, will take about five to eight years to be constructed.



It will have a liquid jetty and a tank farm spread over 70 hectares. While JNPT is India's largest container port with 4.1 million twenty-foot equivalent unit (TEU) container capacity, it lags behind other ports in providing terminals for liquid cargo.



Even though the port has a twinberth liquid cargo terminal run by the state oil refiners Bharat Petroleum and Indian Oil Corp, the capacity is just 5.5 million tonnes with a waiting period running into about six to seven days.



JNPT is expanding through public-private partnerships and hopes to reach a capacity of 10 million TEU by 2017. The bidding process to construct the fourth container terminal, which will be 2,000-meter long and add 4.8 million TEU of capacity per annum, is currently on, and the names of the qualifying bidders will be announced in 10 days, said Kumar.



The qualifying bidders will be then given a price bidding form by mid-November while JNPT will seek security clearance for these companies from the Ministry of Shipping. Kumar said the winning bid should be announced by mid-January.



Adani Ports, Essar Ports, Dubai Port World, APM Terminals, Port of Singapore Authority, Sterlite Ports, United Liner Agencies and International Container Terminal Services have participated in the qualifying process for theRs 8,000-crore project.



JNPT is also looking to build a multi-logistics container cargo handling facility for not less thanRs 3,000 crore spread over 200 hectares, which will come into use after the fourth container terminal is built, said JNPT's Kumar.



Currently, the cargo is segregated inside the yard. The proposed multi-logistics facility will separate the cargo coming in through the new eight-lane JNPT road and the dedicated freight corridor, both of which is also expected to be completed by 2017.


Source:- economictimes.indiatimes.com





India Eyes More Iranian Oil, But Without Violating Us Sanctions

17-Oct-2013


India is exploring ways to increase crude oil supplies from Iran without attracting US sanctions.



The current waiver granted to India by the US is set to expire in December and any further extension is largely dependent on how far business with Iran has been contained.




A senior Government official told Business Line that, “It was decided in the meeting of senior officials held recently that it was necessary to increase oil imports from Iran as payment for it is made in rupee and we get to save precious foreign exchange. But, it can only be done if it is legally possible.”



At present, the legal tenability of buying more Iranian crude oil during the fiscal without affecting other commercial relations (US) is being examined by the External Affairs Ministry’s legal & tender department. The US could allow higher imports this year since there was sharp drop in crude sourcing from Iran last year, the official said.



Imports from Iran were brought down by more than 25 per cent last year, while the US had only asked for a gradual reduction. Last year total imports from Iran were at 13.14 million tonne.



“It all depends on how the term ‘gradual reduction’ is interpreted. The other countries that had been granted waiver by the US have reduced their annual purchase by about 15 per cent,” the official said.



The architects of the US sanctions legislation, Democratic Senator Robert Menendez and Republican Senator Mark Kirk, had proposed that oil importers should reduce their purchases by 18 per cent or more every year to qualify for further exemptions.



In 2011, the US imposed sanctions against Iran for suspected nuclear activities. It meant that those countries which continue to do business including purchase of oil with Iran will not be extended support from the US financial system.



Countries dependent on Iranian oil such as India, China and Japan, were given the first round of waiver in June last year on the condition that they gradually reduce their purchases from the Gulf country. This was further extended till end of this year.



While the Government is exploring this aspect, domestic oil refiners feel that India would need to resolve the insurance issue to enable them to purchase more from Iran. “Supply is not an issue, but it is lack of insurance cover which is affecting imports from Iran,” said one of the domestic refiners.



If the Government wants supplies to increase then it has to resolve the insurance issue, the refiner added. Western sanctions do not prevent Indian insurance companies from providing cover, but they depend on reinsurance from the Western companies, because of the high risks involved.



The sanctions discourage global re-insurers from taking on the risk.



To resolve this, the Government is putting in place an insurance fund. The Fund is yet to become operational.


Source:- thehindubusinessline.com





Silver Prices In 2014 Will Ride Higher Thanks To India

17-Oct-2013


While silver demand among U.S. traders at the moment is muted, silver demand in India - the world's biggest buyer of the white metal - is insatiable.



It will be one of the biggest factors supporting higher silver prices in 2014.



And it all stems from a move the government made to limit gold buying...




India - the world's biggest gold buyer - imposed heavy import duties on the yellow metal this year to try and narrow India's swollen trade gap. The government raised the import duty on gold three times this year to 10%.



In July, the government told importers that one-fifth of their purchases would have to be turned around for export. Only 80% would be available for domestic use.



As these import numbers show, silver has become the "go-to" precious metal for India's investors.



Data released early last week showed Indian silver imports are set to hit a record this year.



According to metals consultancy firm GFMS, India imported 4,073 tons of silver from January to August. That was more than double the 1,921 tons in all of 2012, when a spike in prices during the peak season pressured demand. The record high was set in 2008 when India imported 5,048 tons.



"Ever since the government has started putting measures to curb gold imports, demand for silver has seen a sudden surge," Monal Thakkar, president of Amrapali Industries, a leading Ahmedabad-based stock and commodity brokerage house, told the Business Standard. "Moreover, there is a general scare in the market that the government might soon start curbing silver imports also, as a result, traders are stocking up silver."



But the fresh spike in silver buying is unlikely to result in a similar policy response from authorities since the value of imported silver is much lower than gold and is not critical to the country's trade balance.



Industry experts expect demand for silver to remain high in India as long as gold prices and import taxes stay elevated.



Also contributing to the silver frenzy in India is the uptick in disposable income in rural areas due to a "good" monsoon season. While the June to September rains can be deadly, they are essential to the country's agriculture and economy.



"There is less gold available so rural people will gradually move to silver. It will be more of a default option than a conscious choice," Rajesh Khosla, managing director with refiner MMTC PAMP told Reuters.



Whether as a gold substitute, an alternative investment, or a safe haven asset, silver will be profitable for investors.



The increased interest in silver will be a major price catalyst into 2014 - giving the white metal an edge over gold.



"Going forward, the recovery will be sharper in silver compared to gold," Gnanasekar Thiagrajan, director with Commtrendz Research told Reuters.


Source:- moneymorning.com





Profit sprouting from delivery based transaction of shares would be taxable as capital gain

IT: Profit arising from delivery based transaction of shares should be taxable as capital gain


India Seals Deals To Export 175,000 T Raw Sugar This Year

17-Oct-2013


Traders have signed contracts to supply about 50,000 tonnes of raw sugar to Iran, while the rest of it will go to refineries in the Middle East, said a source with direct knowledge of the deal.


Confirming the deals, another source said dealers had agreed to export raws from India for $445-$450 a tonne, free on board.


So far India has not struck deals with Indonesia, the world's biggest raw sugar importer, as Jakarta has already locked in supplies until June 2014, an Indonesian trader said.


India, the world's biggest producer after Brazil, is expected to step up raw sugar exports in the 2013/14 season.


"As crushing gathers momentum in the new season, we expect more export deals for raw sugar and that is absolutely essential for mills to survive," said the third source, who also confirmed these contracts.


In the 2013/14 season, India is likely to export about 2 million tonnes of sugar, including 1.2 million-1.5 million tonnes of raws, traders said. India could export hardly 300,000 tonnes of sugar, all whites, in the previous 2012/13 season.


Higher output in the past three years and weak demand for white sugar exports have left mills with massive stocks of the refined variety.


Carry-forward stocks on Oct. 1, when the current 2013/14 sugar season began, were at 8.8 million tonnes of whites and the country is forecast to produce 25 million tonnes of sugar this year, higher than local consumption of 23 million tonnes.


Mills incur extra costs when maintaining large stocks and domestic prices tend to remain soft because of big inventories.


To overcome the problem, mills in India, also the world's biggest sugar consumer, are increasingly turning towards raw sugar exports this year that began in October.


To cash in on the demand for raws, traders are also encouraging mills to produce more raws at the start of season.


Expanding sugar refining capacities in Asia and Africa will absorb supplies of raws from India.


Capacity for turning raw sugar into the white variety in countries such as Sri Lanka, Iraq, Yemen, Egypt and Bahrain, is expected to almost double from current levels of 5.6 million tonnes annually in coming years.


On Thursday, the Indian Sugar Mills Association, a producers' body, asked the government to give incentives to help boost exports of the refined variety.


Source:- in.reuters.com





Rbi’S Re-Export Norm Continues To Impede Gold Imports

17-Oct-2013


Gold imports continue to be affected as importers struggle to meet the Reserve Bank of India’s mandatory norm of re-exporting 20 per cent of the precious metal brought into the country.


This, in turn, has resulted in domestic gold prices ruling seven per cent higher than global prices.


“There is huge shortfall in gold supplies currently, even as festival buying is picking up. Lack of imported consignments is pushing up prices here,” said Harmesh Arora, spokesman for the Bombay Bullion Association.


On July 22, the RBI issued a notification making it mandatory for those importing gold to re-export at least 20 per cent of the quantity imported into the country.


“Since then, hardly a couple of tonnes of gold have come into the country,” said Arora.


The RBI had come up with the re-export norm as part of the Government’s efforts to curb the rising current account deficit (CAD), which ballooned to $21.8 billion in the first quarter of the current fiscal. Gold imports are seen as a major reason for trade imbalance, resulting in CAD rising.


On Thursday, spot gold in the global market ruled at $1,318.35 for an ounce. Taking into consideration the global price (about Rs 26,000), the 10 per cent import duty (Rs 260) and other charges such as handling, the cost should be around Rs 29,000.


But in Mumbai, pure gold (99.9 per cent purity) closed at Rs 31,120 for 10 gm, a premium of over Rs 2,000.


“In fact, people are selling gold in the physical market and buying in the futures ,” said Prithviraj Kothari, Director of Riddhi Siddhi Bullion Ltd. “Though prices in the domestic futures are ruling higher than global prices, they are cheaper than spot prices,” he said. On the Multi Commodity Exchange, gold contracts maturing in December ruled at Rs 29,946. “Gold in India is ruling higher only because imports have been totally hit,” said Arora.


Initially, lack of clarity and Customs authorities not being sure on implementing the norm were blamed for imports coming to a standstill. On September 20, the Commerce Department officials said that gold imports would resume as the Government would help the Customs Department in interpreting the RBI notification correctly.


“It is impossible to fulfil the norm of re-exporting 20 per cent. Banks, which buy the precious metal on our behalf, are not willing to import,” said Ba. Ramesh, Joint Managing Director of Thangamayil Jewellery Ltd.


Importers say that it will be difficult to meet the norm since re-exports accounted for hardly six per cent of total imports during the last two years.


“The problem has been compounded because Customs authorities want us to meet the stipulation for each consignment,” said Arora. The RBI notification said that fresh imports would be allowed only after an importer re-exports 20 per cent of the shipments brought into the country earlier. Banks also have to keep the gold meant for re-export in separate Customs bonded warehouses.


“It takes between 60 and 90 days for exports to take place. Until then, you can’t bring gold into the country,” said Kothari.


Currently, only gold that is meant to be re-exported is finding its way through the ports.


“Totally, imports in the last couple of months could have hardly been four tonnes,” Arora said.


During January-September this year, gold imports were a little short of 400 tonnes with the bulk coming in during April-June. Last year, gold imports totalled 860 tonnes, down from 969 tonnes in 2011.


“We don’t think that imports will rise drastically over the next couple of months due to the prohibitive policy,” said Ramesh.


Source:- thehindubusinessline.com





Rupee Rises Tracking Continued Sell-Off In Dollar Vs Majors

The rupee is trading at 61.12/13 against the dollar versus its close of 61.23/24 on Thursday, tracking a continued sell-off in the greenback across all major currencies on worries of the economic impact from the weeks-long U.S. government shutdown.



The dollar nursed losses near an eight-month low against a basket of currencies on Friday as traders focused on the economic impact of an acrimonious showdown in Washington that dragged the United States to the brink of a debt default.


Source:- in.reuters.com





Scamsters drain out PF accounts with fake claims, EPFO swings into damage-control mode

NEW DELHI: Nearly 2.5 crore, or 30 per cent, of all provident fund accounts have a negative balance, some of which may be due to fraudsters who faked withdrawal claims to siphon off money by opening bank accounts using forged identity documents.

The PF department, startled by these two separate findings made over the last few days, has swung into damage-control mode, issuing strict instructions to field offices to fix responsibility for these lapses, correct the spectre of negative balances and ensure that no fake claims get through the system.


But the 8.15 crore formal sector employees with PF accounts should be worried, especially if they have switched multiple jobs in recent years but failed to withdraw or transfer the PF balances, or if an ex-employer has shut down in recent years.




Employees' Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO) chief vigilance officer Sanjay Kumar has flagged an internal investigation that has found fraudulent withdrawals, orchestrated in accounts that have not had fresh inflows for years. Such claims managed to evade all checks and balances in the system and PF staffers were pressured using 'all possible means' to clear these fake claims swiftly.

Insiders seem to have colluded with the scamsters in identifying dormant accounts and actively facilitating their loot. This also brings into question the Know Your Customer or KYC norms followed by banks. "The claims were settled by putting pressure on dealing hands/office by all possible means. In all these cases, the amount settled had been sent through NEFT (electronic funds transfer) in the bank accounts opened with forged identity," Kumar has said in a letter warning EPFO's field offices about the scam. "This has been the modus operandi that has been used in the EPF office over the years, but we have said this is unacceptable and initiated action against it," said a senior official.


He, however, said that all such fraudulent withdrawals may not be criminal in nature as some employers often create PF accounts for their relatives showing them as employees.


In April 2011, the EPFO stopped crediting interest on PF accounts that hadn't seen fresh contributions for three years.





IRDA notifies procedure and application form for categorization of surveyors

INSURANCE : Categorisation and upgradation of surveyors


CESTAT gets 6 new benches; a move for timely disposal of cases

ST : Section 129 of the Customs Act, 1962 - Appellate Tribunal - Constitution of - CESTAT gets six additional benches, three at existing locations of New Delhi, Mumbai and Chennai and three new benches at Chandigarh, Allahabad and Hyderabad


HC slams revenue, dismisses its appeal as various aspects of impugned issue were left open by revenu

IT: Where Assessing Officer allowed assessee's claim for deduction of privilege fee paid to State Government and Commissioner revised order of Assessing Officer holding that privilege fee could not be allowed as deductible expenditure and further Tribunal remanded matter to Commissioner for re-examination, since all aspects of matter being left open by Tribunal, appeal filed by revenue was liable to be dismissed


Agents providing money transfer services on behalf of foreign principal aren’t liable to ST

ST: Money transfer services provided by sub-agents by way of delivery of money in India on behalf of M/s. Western Union located abroad amounts to export of service and would not be taxable in India


If last panchnama was merely a release order, it won't extend limitation period for block assessment

IT: Where last panchnama was merely a release order, same could not extend period of limitation for completing block assessment order


Any artwork with life span of less than 6 months couldn't be deemed as capital expenditure

IT : Any art work which has a life of six months or less cannot be considered as capital expenditure


Another 10 lakh Income Tax defaulters identified










The Income Tax (I-T) department has identified 10 lakh more high-risk individuals, who have made significant cash transactions through their credit cards or investments but the same had not been reflecting in their I-T returns. High-risk individuals also include those who have consistently not been filing I-T returns. Altogether, there are over 22 lakh I-T defaulters since the data-mining exercise started two years ago.

Notices are to be issued to these entities soon, said an I-T official. Last year about 12 lakh individuals were identified, where their transactions didn't match with their returns, raising suspicion. More than 2.45 lakh such individuals had already been served notices for suspected tax evasion till September.


Sources said that the notices issued to individuals till March had tax implications in the range of about Rs 3,800 crore.



Finland hopeful of amicable settlement of Nokia’s tax dispute

Finland has expressed hope that its telecom major Nokia’s tax dispute with the Indian Government will be settled amicably.


Finnish Foreign Trade Minister Alexander Stubb, who is in India with a 30-member strong business delegation, discussed Nokia’s taxation woes with his counterpart Anand Sharma on Tuesday.


Nokia, which sold its handset business to US-based Microsoft last month, is embroiled in a dispute with the Indian Government on a retrospective tax demand of Rs 2,080 crore from the Finance Ministry.

“It was very good to get the arguments on both sides. I am quite confident that the issue will be resolved positively,” Stubb told reporters after the meeting.


It is probably not for me or Sharma to decide on those issues that is being dealt with in normal rule of law in the Indian courts, Stubb added.


The Finnish Foreign Trade Minister’s delegation represents diverse sectors such as energy & environmental technology, mining, metals, construction, information technology, health & well-being and financing. ONGC and Finland’s clean technology firm Chempolis have signed an agreement to produce ethanol, bio chemicals and bio-coal from biomass residual matters that would reduce India’s dependence on imports.


The agreement was signed by Stubb and Minister of State for Petroleum and Natural Gas Panabaka Lakshmi.

“We have signed an MoU with a Finnish company called Chempolis. It is for conversion of cellulose into ethanol. We have developed a technology by which all cellulose-based waste products can be converted into ethanol,” ONGC Chairman Sudhir Vasudeva said.





Case remanded to SEBI to consider whether appellant had facilitated accused to make ill-gotten gains

SEBI : Where appellant cornered shares while dealing in shares of two companies in their IPO and facilitated some others to make gains, if matter was remanded for reconsideration in case of those persons, appellant's case was also to be remanded


Cash payments to agents to procure raw materials covered by Rule 6DD; no sec. 40A(3) disallowance

IT: Payments made in excess of Rs. 20,000 ginning factory to its agents for procuring cotton could not be disallowed under section 40A(3)


Mr. Sunil Kumar D. Shah (HUF), Hyderabad vs. The Dy. Commissioner of Income-tax, Central Circle-2 Hyderabad Appellant Respondent











IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
HYDERABAD BENCH `B', HYDERABAD

BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER and
SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER

ITA No. 1704/Hyd/2012 ­ A.Y. 2002-03
ITA No. 1705/Hyd/2012 ­ A.Y. 2003-04
ITA No. 1706/Hyd/2012 ­ A.Y. 2004-05
ITA No. 1707/Hyd/2012 ­ A.Y. 2005-06
ITA No. 1708/Hyd/2012 ­ A.Y. 2006-07

Mr. Sunil Kumar D. Shah vs. The Dy. Commissioner of
(HUF), Hyderabad Income-tax, Central Circle-2
PAN: AANHS6941R Hyderabad
Appellant Respondent

Appellant by: Sri A. Srinivas
Respondent by: Sri T. Diwakar Prasad

Date of hearing: 10.10.2013
Date of pronouncement: 10.10.2013


ORDER

PER CHANDRA POOJARI, AM:

The above five appeals by the assessee are directed against
the common order of the CIT(A) dated 12.9.2012 for A.Ys. 2002-03
to 2008-09. Since the issues involved in these appeals are common
in nature, these appeals are clubbed together, heard together and
are being disposed of by this common order for the sake of
convenience.

2. In these cases, the CIT(A) passed a common order for A.Ys.
2002-03 to 2008-09. The assessee filed seven appeals for all these
years in ITA Nos. 1704/Hyd/2012 to 1710/Hyd/2012. All these
appeals were heard on earlier occasion i.e., 23.5.2013. The Tribunal
disposed of only the appeals in ITA No. 1709 and 1710/Hyd/2012
vide order dated 23.5.2013. However, ITA Nos. 1704 to 1708/Hyd/
2012 were released vide order sheet entry dated 24.5.2013 which is
as follows:
2 ITA No. 1704/Hyd/2012 & Ors.
Mr. Sunil Kumar D. Shah (HUF)
=========================

"24/5/13. At the time of hearing, the learned counsel
for the assessee advanced arguments only on the
technical ground that the assessments for the A.Ys.
2002-03 to 2005-06 were not pending as on the date of
search and hence u/s. 153C of the IT Act. The
agricultural income declared in the regular returns of
income could not be brought to tax. The ld. DR also
argued on this issue.

However, at the time of hearing, it is found that
the 'A' has not raised this ground of appeal before the
Tribunal. The ground raised is only against the merits
of the addition and no arguments are advanced on this
issue.

Therefore, the appeals for A.Y. 2002-03 to A.Y.
2005-06 are released from HEARD and posted for
hearing on 20th of June, 2013. Issue notice to both the
parties.
Sd/-
JM (SMC)"


3. In view of the above, ITA Nos. 1704 to 1708/Hyd/2012 came
up for hearing today the 10th October, 2013. Accordingly, we take
up ITA Nos. 1704 to 1708/Hyd/2013 for A.Ys. 2002-03 to 2006-07.
Firstly, we take up ITA Nos. 1704 to 1707/Hyd/2012 for A.Ys. 2002-
03 to 2005-06.

ITA Nos. 1704, 1705, 1706 and 1707/Hyd/2012:

4. The grievance of the assessee in these appeals is with regard
to treating agricultural income as regular income of the assessee.
The learned AR submitted that the assessee is regularly declaring
agricultural income in the return of income and the same cannot be
considered as non-agricultural income on account of search action
u/s. 132 of the Act on 9.10.2007 at the residence of the assessee.
He submitted that there is no seized material, whatsoever, found
during the course of search to treat the agricultural income declared
by the assessee in regular return of income as 'income from other
sources' while framing assessment u/s. 143(3) r.w.s. 153C of the Act.
3 ITA No. 1704/Hyd/2012 & Ors.
Mr. Sunil Kumar D. Shah (HUF)
=========================

He relied on the order of the Tribunal dated 27.9.2013 in the case of
DCIT vs. Kishoresons Detergents Pvt. Ltd. in ITA Nos. 1817 to
1820/Hyd/2012 wherein held as under:

"13. We have heard the arguments of both the parties,
perused the record and have gone through the orders
of the authorities as well as the decisions cited.
Additions have been made by the AO for the reason
that the assessee has not admitted the normal profits
from its manufacturing activity as compared to the
other years in consideration and has understated the
incomes, for the respective years on the basis of the
inferences drawn from the variations in the ratio of net
profits to that of gross profits of the assessee. On the
other hand, the CIT(A) before directing the AO to
delete the additions made gave categorical findings
that "the AO has not shown any defects in the books or
method of accountancy adopted by the assessee and
books are not rejected so as to estimate the profits of
business. Rather such estimation is resorted to
superfluous methods of percentage of net of gross,
which is not ordinarily heard in the accounting
languages/practices. Further, the additions made on
theoretical basis, based on surmises and conjectures
are desired to be desisted in search related cases with
no adverse information found, in support of such
estimation/method."



14. Similar issue came up for consideration before the
coordinate bench of ITAT, Hyderabad in case of M/s
Spectrum Pearls & Exports Pvt. Ltd. (supra)wherein
the coordinate bench held as follows:

"8. ... The case records reveal that no incriminating
material was found during the course of search
operations. The determination of undisclosed income
consequent to search action and framing assessment
under section 153C of the Act is different from regular
assessment or it is not substitute for regular
assessment. Being so, the AO shall frame assessment
on the basis of incriminating material found during the
course of search action u/s 153C of the Act. The AO
without bringing any incriminating material on record
for the purpose of determination of undisclosed income
on estimate basis is not possible in the present
circumstances to frame the assessment u/s 153C of the
Act. Therefore, after considering the totality of facts
4 ITA No. 1704/Hyd/2012 & Ors.
Mr. Sunil Kumar D. Shah (HUF)
=========================

and the circumstances of the case and after going
through the order of the CIT(A) in the instant case, we
find that the CIT(A) is perfectly justified in allowing the
claims of the assessee. In this view of the matter, no
interference is called for."

15. In the present case, we find that no incriminating
evidence found against the assessee in proving that
unaccounted incomes were generated by suppression
of profit and, therefore, the AO is not justified in
resorting to estimation and arithmetical assumptions.
Accordingly, we find no infirmity in the order of the
CIT(A) in directing the AO to delete the additions made
by holding that the additions made based on the
percentage of net over gross adopted by the AO are
held to be without any basis that can be justified on
factual or legal grounds and the order of the CIT(A) is
hereby confirmed dismissing the grounds of appeal
raised by the revenue in this regard in all the years
under consideration.

16. In the result, all the appeals being ITA No. 1817,
1818, 1819 & 1820/Hyd/2012 filed by the revenue are
dismissed."

5. On the other hand, the learned DR submitted that as far as
the appeals for the years i.e. AY 2002-03 to 2005-06 are concerned,
the only ground relating to agricultural income is common for all
these years under appeal. According to the AO, the lands received
by the assessee through oral partition were barren lands situated at
Vattinagulapalli village where no crops were cultivated. The AO
obtained revenue records of the land i.e., Pahanis from Mandal
Revenue Office and found that these lands are vacant. He referred
to the order of Tribunal Hyderabad Bench in the case of Shri Suresh
Kumar D Shah in ITA Nos. 420 to 425 dated 16-12-2011 wherein
similar issue came up for hearing. By giving elaborate reasons, it
was held by the Tribunal that the land was barren and rocky and no
agricultural operations were carried out. Incidentally Shri Suresh
Kumar D Shah also entered into development agreement with
Dakshin Shelters Pvt. Ltd in the year relevant to the AY 2007-08.
M/s. Dakshin Shelters Pvt. Ltd had entered into development
5 ITA No. 1704/Hyd/2012 & Ors.
Mr. Sunil Kumar D. Shah (HUF)
=========================

agreement with the whole family of Shri Suresh Kumar D Shah, Shri
Sunil Kumar D Shah and Shri Sudhir Kumar D Shah as well as other
family members in respect of the land situated at Vattinagulapalli
village. All these lands are contiguous to each other. Therefore, the
contention of the assessee that it is carrying on agricultural
operations on this land is highly doubtful due to the nature of land it
possesses at Vattinagulapalli village. In the course of appellate
proceedings before the CIT(A), the assessee was asked to furnish
the evidence of agricultural operations carried on by the assessee
and to furnish the details such as type of crops grown, expenditure
details, sale of the agricultural produce etc. It is also enquired from
the assessee whether the land was cultivated by the assessee itself
or given on lease (Kowlu) to others. The contention of the assessee
that it is regularly declaring the agricultural income in their income-
tax returns is not a valid reason for accepting the claim that the
assessee is having agricultural income on regular basis. The
assessee could not furnish the details of agricultural operations
carried out on this land so as to derive the so called agricultural
income from year to year. Unless regular cultivation of land had
taken place the said activity cannot be construed as agricultural
activity. When the assessee claimed the particular income as
agricultural income, the onus lies on it to prove beyond reasonable
doubt that the income so derived is on account of agricultural
operations carried by the assessee. The assessee should prove with
details of expenses incurred on account of cultivation of land, tilling
of land, sowing, transport and marketing heads etc. Even perusal of
quantum of agricultural income disclosed year after year does not
inspire much confidence about the genuineness of the claim of the
assessee. It is for the assessee to establish the existence of
agricultural income in its hands. In view of the above discussion, the
assessee is unable to prove in all fours the agricultural income
disclosed in these years under appeal. Accordingly, the claim of the
assessee under agricultural income is rejected and the action of the
6 ITA No. 1704/Hyd/2012 & Ors.
Mr. Sunil Kumar D. Shah (HUF)
=========================

AO in treating the amounts as income from other sources for all the
years under appeal i.e., assessment year 2002-03 to 2005-06 is
sustained.

6. We have heard both the parties and perused the material on
record. The contention of the assessee is that there is no seized
material to treat the agricultural income as non-agricultural income
while framing the assessment u/s. 143(3) r.w.s. 153C of the Act. In
our opinion, determination of income consequent to search action by
framing assessment u/s. 143(3) r.w.s. 153C of the Act is different
from regular assessment and it is not a substitute for regular
assessment. Being so, the Assessing Officer shall frame the
assessment on the basis of incriminating material found during the
course of search action u/s. 132 of the Act and other material
gathered subsequent to search action. In the present case, we are
unable to appreciate on the basis on which seized material the AO
came to the conclusion that the assessee has not earned agricultural
income. In our opinion, it is appropriate to remit the issue back to
the file of the AO to specify the basis on which seized material or
material collected consequent to search action was used for the
purpose of framing assessment. While framing the assessment he
has to consider the judgement of jurisdictional High Court in the
case of Gopal Lal Bhadruka, Avadesh Bhadurka and Ahura Holdings
vs. DCIT (346 ITR 106) (AP), wherein the Hon'ble High Court
observed that, "Sections 153A, 153B and 153C were inserted in the
Income-tax Act, 1961, with effect from June 1, 2003, in Chapter XlV.
These sections are applicable to search operations or requisitions
made after May 31, 2003. Simultaneously section 158BI was
inserted in Chapter XIV-B. By virtue of section 158BI of the Act, the
various provisions of Chapter XIV-B of the Act are made inapplicable
to proceedings under sections 153A and 153C of the Act. The effect
of this is that while the provisions of Chapter XIV -B of the Act limit
the inquiry by the Assessing Officer to those materials found during
7 ITA No. 1704/Hyd/2012 & Ors.
Mr. Sunil Kumar D. Shah (HUF)
=========================



the search and seizure operation, no such limitation is found in so
far as sections 153A and 153C of the Act are concerned. Therefore,
it follows that for the purposes of sections 153A and 153C of the Act,
the Assessing Officer can take into consideration material other than
what was available during the search and seizure operation for
making an assessment of the undisclosed income of the assessee"
and decide the matter in accordance with law. The assessee's
appeals in ITA Nos. 1704 to 1707/Hyd/2012 are allowed for
statistical purposes.

ITA No. 1708/Hyd/2012 ­ A.Y. 2006-07:

7. The assessee raised the following grounds of appeal:

(1) The order of the AO is contrary to law, facts and
circumstances of the case.

(2) The AO ought not to have treated the Agriculture
Income of Rs. 24,000 as regular income of the
assessee.

(3) The AO ought not to have added an amount of Rs.
2,08,63,927 as long term capital gains.

(4) The CIT(A) erred in dismissing the appeal in limine
applying the provisions of section 249(4)(a).

(5) The CIT(A) ought to have seen that the cash seized
by the Department during the course of search was
adjusted and thus erred in applying the provisions
of section 249(4)(a).

(6) The CIT(A) ought not to have dismissed the appeal
in limine without adjudicating on the grounds of
appeal on merits.

8. First we will decide ground No. 6 which goes to the root of
the matter. This appeal was un-admitted by the CIT(A) on the
reason that the assessee has not paid admitted tax.

9. The learned AR submitted that the assessee filed his return of
income for A.Y. 2006-07 on 12th March, 2007 and paid admitted tax
8 ITA No. 1704/Hyd/2012 & Ors.
Mr. Sunil Kumar D. Shah (HUF)
=========================

at Rs. 32,618. He also produced copy of return bearing
acknowledgement No. 0501007093 and challan for payment of Rs.
th
32,618 paid in Bank of India on 9 March, 2007.

10. The learned DR relied on the order of the CIT(A).

11. We have heard both the parties and perused the material on
record. In our opinion, there is due payment of admitted tax by the
assessee for assessment year under consideration. Being so, the
CIT(A) without pointing out the non-payment of admitted tax to the
assessee, he is not justified in dismissing the appeal of the assessee
in limine. Accordingly, we remit the entire issue back to the file of
the CIT(A) to decide the issue raised by the assessee in his appeal on
merit. Assessee's appeal is allowed on this ground. We decline to
entertain the other grounds raised by the assessee as these grounds
are not at all adjudicated by the CIT(A). The CIT(A) is directed to
decide the grounds raised by the assessee on merit after giving
opportunity of hearing to the assessee.

12. In the result, ITA No. 1708/Hyd/12 is partly allowed.

Order pronounced in the open court on 10th October, 2013.

Sd/- Sd/-
(SAKTIJIT DEY) (CHANDRA POOJARI)
JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

Hyderabad, dated the 10th October, 2013
tprao

Copy forwarded to:

1. Mr. Sunil Kumar D. Shah (HUF), 8-2-401/C/2, Street No. 1,
Road No. 5, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad-500 034.
2. The Dy. Commissioner of Income-tax, Central Circle-2,
Aayakar Bhavan, Hyderabad.
3. The CIT(A)-I, Hyderabad.
4. The CIT (Central), Hyderabad
5. The DR ­ 'B' Bench, ITAT, Hyderabad

Mr. Sunil Kumar D. Shah (HUF), Hyderabad vs. The Dy. Commissioner of Income-tax, Central Circle-2 Hyderabad Appellant Respondent











IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
HYDERABAD BENCH `B', HYDERABAD

BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER and
SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER

ITA No. 1704/Hyd/2012 ­ A.Y. 2002-03
ITA No. 1705/Hyd/2012 ­ A.Y. 2003-04
ITA No. 1706/Hyd/2012 ­ A.Y. 2004-05
ITA No. 1707/Hyd/2012 ­ A.Y. 2005-06
ITA No. 1708/Hyd/2012 ­ A.Y. 2006-07

Mr. Sunil Kumar D. Shah vs. The Dy. Commissioner of
(HUF), Hyderabad Income-tax, Central Circle-2
PAN: AANHS6941R Hyderabad
Appellant Respondent

Appellant by: Sri A. Srinivas
Respondent by: Sri T. Diwakar Prasad

Date of hearing: 10.10.2013
Date of pronouncement: 10.10.2013


ORDER

PER CHANDRA POOJARI, AM:

The above five appeals by the assessee are directed against
the common order of the CIT(A) dated 12.9.2012 for A.Ys. 2002-03
to 2008-09. Since the issues involved in these appeals are common
in nature, these appeals are clubbed together, heard together and
are being disposed of by this common order for the sake of
convenience.

2. In these cases, the CIT(A) passed a common order for A.Ys.
2002-03 to 2008-09. The assessee filed seven appeals for all these
years in ITA Nos. 1704/Hyd/2012 to 1710/Hyd/2012. All these
appeals were heard on earlier occasion i.e., 23.5.2013. The Tribunal
disposed of only the appeals in ITA No. 1709 and 1710/Hyd/2012
vide order dated 23.5.2013. However, ITA Nos. 1704 to 1708/Hyd/
2012 were released vide order sheet entry dated 24.5.2013 which is
as follows:
2 ITA No. 1704/Hyd/2012 & Ors.
Mr. Sunil Kumar D. Shah (HUF)
=========================

"24/5/13. At the time of hearing, the learned counsel
for the assessee advanced arguments only on the
technical ground that the assessments for the A.Ys.
2002-03 to 2005-06 were not pending as on the date of
search and hence u/s. 153C of the IT Act. The
agricultural income declared in the regular returns of
income could not be brought to tax. The ld. DR also
argued on this issue.

However, at the time of hearing, it is found that
the 'A' has not raised this ground of appeal before the
Tribunal. The ground raised is only against the merits
of the addition and no arguments are advanced on this
issue.

Therefore, the appeals for A.Y. 2002-03 to A.Y.
2005-06 are released from HEARD and posted for
hearing on 20th of June, 2013. Issue notice to both the
parties.
Sd/-
JM (SMC)"


3. In view of the above, ITA Nos. 1704 to 1708/Hyd/2012 came
up for hearing today the 10th October, 2013. Accordingly, we take
up ITA Nos. 1704 to 1708/Hyd/2013 for A.Ys. 2002-03 to 2006-07.
Firstly, we take up ITA Nos. 1704 to 1707/Hyd/2012 for A.Ys. 2002-
03 to 2005-06.

ITA Nos. 1704, 1705, 1706 and 1707/Hyd/2012:

4. The grievance of the assessee in these appeals is with regard
to treating agricultural income as regular income of the assessee.
The learned AR submitted that the assessee is regularly declaring
agricultural income in the return of income and the same cannot be
considered as non-agricultural income on account of search action
u/s. 132 of the Act on 9.10.2007 at the residence of the assessee.
He submitted that there is no seized material, whatsoever, found
during the course of search to treat the agricultural income declared
by the assessee in regular return of income as 'income from other
sources' while framing assessment u/s. 143(3) r.w.s. 153C of the Act.
3 ITA No. 1704/Hyd/2012 & Ors.
Mr. Sunil Kumar D. Shah (HUF)
=========================

He relied on the order of the Tribunal dated 27.9.2013 in the case of
DCIT vs. Kishoresons Detergents Pvt. Ltd. in ITA Nos. 1817 to
1820/Hyd/2012 wherein held as under:



"13. We have heard the arguments of both the parties,
perused the record and have gone through the orders
of the authorities as well as the decisions cited.
Additions have been made by the AO for the reason
that the assessee has not admitted the normal profits
from its manufacturing activity as compared to the
other years in consideration and has understated the
incomes, for the respective years on the basis of the
inferences drawn from the variations in the ratio of net
profits to that of gross profits of the assessee. On the
other hand, the CIT(A) before directing the AO to
delete the additions made gave categorical findings
that "the AO has not shown any defects in the books or
method of accountancy adopted by the assessee and
books are not rejected so as to estimate the profits of
business. Rather such estimation is resorted to
superfluous methods of percentage of net of gross,
which is not ordinarily heard in the accounting
languages/practices. Further, the additions made on
theoretical basis, based on surmises and conjectures
are desired to be desisted in search related cases with
no adverse information found, in support of such
estimation/method."

14. Similar issue came up for consideration before the
coordinate bench of ITAT, Hyderabad in case of M/s
Spectrum Pearls & Exports Pvt. Ltd. (supra)wherein
the coordinate bench held as follows:

"8. ... The case records reveal that no incriminating
material was found during the course of search
operations. The determination of undisclosed income
consequent to search action and framing assessment
under section 153C of the Act is different from regular
assessment or it is not substitute for regular
assessment. Being so, the AO shall frame assessment
on the basis of incriminating material found during the
course of search action u/s 153C of the Act. The AO
without bringing any incriminating material on record
for the purpose of determination of undisclosed income
on estimate basis is not possible in the present
circumstances to frame the assessment u/s 153C of the
Act. Therefore, after considering the totality of facts
4 ITA No. 1704/Hyd/2012 & Ors.
Mr. Sunil Kumar D. Shah (HUF)
=========================

and the circumstances of the case and after going
through the order of the CIT(A) in the instant case, we
find that the CIT(A) is perfectly justified in allowing the
claims of the assessee. In this view of the matter, no
interference is called for."

15. In the present case, we find that no incriminating
evidence found against the assessee in proving that
unaccounted incomes were generated by suppression
of profit and, therefore, the AO is not justified in
resorting to estimation and arithmetical assumptions.
Accordingly, we find no infirmity in the order of the
CIT(A) in directing the AO to delete the additions made
by holding that the additions made based on the
percentage of net over gross adopted by the AO are
held to be without any basis that can be justified on
factual or legal grounds and the order of the CIT(A) is
hereby confirmed dismissing the grounds of appeal
raised by the revenue in this regard in all the years
under consideration.

16. In the result, all the appeals being ITA No. 1817,
1818, 1819 & 1820/Hyd/2012 filed by the revenue are
dismissed."

5. On the other hand, the learned DR submitted that as far as
the appeals for the years i.e. AY 2002-03 to 2005-06 are concerned,
the only ground relating to agricultural income is common for all
these years under appeal. According to the AO, the lands received
by the assessee through oral partition were barren lands situated at
Vattinagulapalli village where no crops were cultivated. The AO
obtained revenue records of the land i.e., Pahanis from Mandal
Revenue Office and found that these lands are vacant. He referred
to the order of Tribunal Hyderabad Bench in the case of Shri Suresh
Kumar D Shah in ITA Nos. 420 to 425 dated 16-12-2011 wherein
similar issue came up for hearing. By giving elaborate reasons, it
was held by the Tribunal that the land was barren and rocky and no
agricultural operations were carried out. Incidentally Shri Suresh
Kumar D Shah also entered into development agreement with
Dakshin Shelters Pvt. Ltd in the year relevant to the AY 2007-08.
M/s. Dakshin Shelters Pvt. Ltd had entered into development
5 ITA No. 1704/Hyd/2012 & Ors.
Mr. Sunil Kumar D. Shah (HUF)
=========================

agreement with the whole family of Shri Suresh Kumar D Shah, Shri
Sunil Kumar D Shah and Shri Sudhir Kumar D Shah as well as other
family members in respect of the land situated at Vattinagulapalli
village. All these lands are contiguous to each other. Therefore, the
contention of the assessee that it is carrying on agricultural
operations on this land is highly doubtful due to the nature of land it
possesses at Vattinagulapalli village. In the course of appellate
proceedings before the CIT(A), the assessee was asked to furnish
the evidence of agricultural operations carried on by the assessee
and to furnish the details such as type of crops grown, expenditure
details, sale of the agricultural produce etc. It is also enquired from
the assessee whether the land was cultivated by the assessee itself
or given on lease (Kowlu) to others. The contention of the assessee
that it is regularly declaring the agricultural income in their income-
tax returns is not a valid reason for accepting the claim that the
assessee is having agricultural income on regular basis. The
assessee could not furnish the details of agricultural operations
carried out on this land so as to derive the so called agricultural
income from year to year. Unless regular cultivation of land had
taken place the said activity cannot be construed as agricultural
activity. When the assessee claimed the particular income as
agricultural income, the onus lies on it to prove beyond reasonable
doubt that the income so derived is on account of agricultural
operations carried by the assessee. The assessee should prove with
details of expenses incurred on account of cultivation of land, tilling
of land, sowing, transport and marketing heads etc. Even perusal of
quantum of agricultural income disclosed year after year does not
inspire much confidence about the genuineness of the claim of the
assessee. It is for the assessee to establish the existence of
agricultural income in its hands. In view of the above discussion, the
assessee is unable to prove in all fours the agricultural income
disclosed in these years under appeal. Accordingly, the claim of the
assessee under agricultural income is rejected and the action of the
6 ITA No. 1704/Hyd/2012 & Ors.
Mr. Sunil Kumar D. Shah (HUF)
=========================

AO in treating the amounts as income from other sources for all the
years under appeal i.e., assessment year 2002-03 to 2005-06 is
sustained.

6. We have heard both the parties and perused the material on
record. The contention of the assessee is that there is no seized
material to treat the agricultural income as non-agricultural income
while framing the assessment u/s. 143(3) r.w.s. 153C of the Act. In
our opinion, determination of income consequent to search action by
framing assessment u/s. 143(3) r.w.s. 153C of the Act is different
from regular assessment and it is not a substitute for regular
assessment. Being so, the Assessing Officer shall frame the
assessment on the basis of incriminating material found during the
course of search action u/s. 132 of the Act and other material
gathered subsequent to search action. In the present case, we are
unable to appreciate on the basis on which seized material the AO
came to the conclusion that the assessee has not earned agricultural
income. In our opinion, it is appropriate to remit the issue back to
the file of the AO to specify the basis on which seized material or
material collected consequent to search action was used for the
purpose of framing assessment. While framing the assessment he
has to consider the judgement of jurisdictional High Court in the
case of Gopal Lal Bhadruka, Avadesh Bhadurka and Ahura Holdings
vs. DCIT (346 ITR 106) (AP), wherein the Hon'ble High Court
observed that, "Sections 153A, 153B and 153C were inserted in the
Income-tax Act, 1961, with effect from June 1, 2003, in Chapter XlV.
These sections are applicable to search operations or requisitions
made after May 31, 2003. Simultaneously section 158BI was
inserted in Chapter XIV-B. By virtue of section 158BI of the Act, the
various provisions of Chapter XIV-B of the Act are made inapplicable
to proceedings under sections 153A and 153C of the Act. The effect
of this is that while the provisions of Chapter XIV -B of the Act limit
the inquiry by the Assessing Officer to those materials found during
7 ITA No. 1704/Hyd/2012 & Ors.
Mr. Sunil Kumar D. Shah (HUF)
=========================

the search and seizure operation, no such limitation is found in so
far as sections 153A and 153C of the Act are concerned. Therefore,
it follows that for the purposes of sections 153A and 153C of the Act,
the Assessing Officer can take into consideration material other than
what was available during the search and seizure operation for
making an assessment of the undisclosed income of the assessee"
and decide the matter in accordance with law. The assessee's
appeals in ITA Nos. 1704 to 1707/Hyd/2012 are allowed for
statistical purposes.



ITA No. 1708/Hyd/2012 ­ A.Y. 2006-07:

7. The assessee raised the following grounds of appeal:

(1) The order of the AO is contrary to law, facts and
circumstances of the case.

(2) The AO ought not to have treated the Agriculture
Income of Rs. 24,000 as regular income of the
assessee.

(3) The AO ought not to have added an amount of Rs.
2,08,63,927 as long term capital gains.

(4) The CIT(A) erred in dismissing the appeal in limine
applying the provisions of section 249(4)(a).

(5) The CIT(A) ought to have seen that the cash seized
by the Department during the course of search was
adjusted and thus erred in applying the provisions
of section 249(4)(a).

(6) The CIT(A) ought not to have dismissed the appeal
in limine without adjudicating on the grounds of
appeal on merits.

8. First we will decide ground No. 6 which goes to the root of
the matter. This appeal was un-admitted by the CIT(A) on the
reason that the assessee has not paid admitted tax.

9. The learned AR submitted that the assessee filed his return of
income for A.Y. 2006-07 on 12th March, 2007 and paid admitted tax
8 ITA No. 1704/Hyd/2012 & Ors.
Mr. Sunil Kumar D. Shah (HUF)
=========================

at Rs. 32,618. He also produced copy of return bearing
acknowledgement No. 0501007093 and challan for payment of Rs.
th
32,618 paid in Bank of India on 9 March, 2007.

10. The learned DR relied on the order of the CIT(A).

11. We have heard both the parties and perused the material on
record. In our opinion, there is due payment of admitted tax by the
assessee for assessment year under consideration. Being so, the
CIT(A) without pointing out the non-payment of admitted tax to the
assessee, he is not justified in dismissing the appeal of the assessee
in limine. Accordingly, we remit the entire issue back to the file of
the CIT(A) to decide the issue raised by the assessee in his appeal on
merit. Assessee's appeal is allowed on this ground. We decline to
entertain the other grounds raised by the assessee as these grounds
are not at all adjudicated by the CIT(A). The CIT(A) is directed to
decide the grounds raised by the assessee on merit after giving
opportunity of hearing to the assessee.

12. In the result, ITA No. 1708/Hyd/12 is partly allowed.

Order pronounced in the open court on 10th October, 2013.

Sd/- Sd/-
(SAKTIJIT DEY) (CHANDRA POOJARI)
JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

Hyderabad, dated the 10th October, 2013
tprao

Copy forwarded to:

1. Mr. Sunil Kumar D. Shah (HUF), 8-2-401/C/2, Street No. 1,
Road No. 5, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad-500 034.
2. The Dy. Commissioner of Income-tax, Central Circle-2,
Aayakar Bhavan, Hyderabad.
3. The CIT(A)-I, Hyderabad.
4. The CIT (Central), Hyderabad
5. The DR ­ 'B' Bench, ITAT, Hyderabad

M/s Micro Max Technologies Pvt. Ltd.,P-31, West Patel Nagar, New Delhi VS. ITO, Ward 6(1), New Delhi

Madhu Finance 212, Tulsiani Chambers,Nariman Point, Mumbai-400 021 Vs. The Income Tax Officer Ward 12(3)(4), M. K. Road, Mumbai

Remedy against erroneous legal opinion of AO lies in sec. 263 and not in sec. 147 scrutiny assessmen

IT: Where Assessing Officer had formed erroneous legal opinion in original assessment order, remedy available to revenue was under section 263 and not under section 147


ST penalties to be waived off as short payment of ST was due to inadvertent error of assessee

ST: Where assessee had short-paid service tax on account of inadvertent excess utilization of credit, which was adjusted voluntarily in next month, there was no intention to evade service tax and, accordingly, penalties were liable to be set aside


Alka Rajesh Agrawal C/o M/s Ravi andDev,Chartered Accountants, 601,“A” Wing, Aurus Chambers,Behind Mahindra Towerw,S.S.Amrutwar Marg, Worli, Mumbai-400013 Vs. Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax, 17(2), Mumbai.











, `'
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL "A" BENCH, MUMBAI

BEFORE S/SHRI B.R.MITTAL,(JM) AND SANJAY ARORA (AM)
.. , ,

./I.T.A. No.2393/Mum/2012
( / Assessment Year:2005-06)

Alka Rajesh Agrawal / Asstt. Commissioner of Income
C/o M/s Ravi andDev, Vs. Tax, 17(2),
Chartered Accountants, 601, Mumbai.
"A" Wing, Aurus Chambers,
Behind Mahindra Towerw,
S.S.Amrut war Marg, Worli,
Mumbai-400013
. / . /PAN/GIR No. : AAFPA5985K
( /Appellant) .. ( / Respondent)

/ Appellant by : Shri Devendra A Mehta
/Respondent by : Shri Surendra Kumar


/ Date of Hearing
: 26.9.2013
/Dat e of Pronouncement : 9.10.2013

/ O R D E R
Per B.R.Mittal, JM:


The assessee has filed this appeal for assessment year 2005-06 against order
of ld. CIT(A) dated 8.2.2012.

2. Only issue involved in this appeal is as to whether the assessee is entitled to
capitalize the interest of Rs.12,58,348/- on the facts and in the circumstances of the
case for computing the short term capital gain on sale of shares.


3. Relevant facts giving rise to this appeal are that the assessee is an individual
deriving income from house property, shares in profits of partnership firm, capital gains
on sale of shares, dividend and bank interest. For the assessment year under
consideration, the return of income was filed on 25.8.2005 declaring income at
Rs.57,49,475/-. The assessment was completed u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act,
1961 (the Act) on 10.7.2007 determining the total income at Rs.70,51,180/-. It is
relevant to state that at the time of making the original assessment, the AO allowed
I.T.A. No.2393/Mum/2012
2


capitalization of the interest paid on purchase of shares towards cost of acquisition while
computing the capital gain. However, ld. Commissioner of Income Tax u/s 263 of the
Act set aside the assessment and directed the AO to reassess the assessee's income
interalia disallowing interest paid on funds borrowed for investment made in shares
while computing the short term capital gain. Pursuant thereto, AO made assessment
u/s 143(3) r.w. section 263 of the Act vide order dated 3.11.2009 and disallowed the
interest aggregating to Rs.12,58,348/- as part of cost of acquisition of shares while
computing the short capital gain in respect of shares, the details of which are given in
para 2 at page 5 of assessment order as under :


Name of company NTPC Ltd. Datamatics Ltd NDTV Ltd. Total
No.of shares
Applied 15,00,000 1,00,000 7,65,000
Allotted 1,25,690 1,950 6,200
Application money
Own funds 1,86,00,000 7,50,000 38,25,000
Borrowed funds 7,44,00,000 1,02,50,000 4,97,25,000
Total 9,30,00,000 1,10,00,000 5,35,50,000
Interest paid 7,03,960 82,000 4,72,388 12,58,348
Interest paid ­ Kotak Birla Global Ltd. Birla Global
partly Mahindra Ltd.
Finance Ltd.
STCG/STCL 21,20,514 (-)2,870 (-)3,87,666


Being aggrieved, the assessee filed appeal before the First Appellate Authority.


4. Ld. CIT(A) relying on the decision of ITAT, Mumbai in the case of Macintosh
Finance Estates Ltd V/s Addl.CIT (2007) 12 SOT 324 (Mum-Trib) confirmed the action
of the AO. Hence, this appeal before the Tribunal.


5. Ld. AR submitted that the assessee applied in the IPOs (Initial Public Offerings)
of NTPC Ltd., NDTV Ltd, and Datamatics Ltd. and used partially her own funds and
partially out of funding from the financial institutions. We may state that the details of
the said shares, the details of funds owned, funds borrowed and the payment of interest
are mentioned hereinabove in para 3. Ld. AR submitted that interest paid to financial
institutions on the amount borrowed by the assessee till the date of allotment of the
said shares has direct relation to the shares allotted under IPOs. Thus, the said
interest has been paid as cost of acquisition for the purpose of computing the capital
gains. Ld. AR submitted that there is a clear nexus between interest paid and the
shares of NTPC Ltd., Datamatics Ltd. and NDTV Ltd. allotted to the assessee, on which
the short term capital gain has been claimed by the assessee. Ld. AR submitted
I.T.A. No.2393/Mum/2012
3




that assessee has neither claimed nor was allowed deduction of interest u/s 57 or
Section 37(1) or Sec.36 (1)(iii) of the Act. Ld. AR submitted that assessee did not
derive any dividend from the said shares. The only income derived by the assessee
from those shares is short term capital gain, which is taxable under the Act. Since,
assessee capitalized the interest, it constitutes cost of acquisition. Ld. AR submitted
that the income from the said shares is not exempt under the Act, the provisions of
section 14A of the Act does not apply. Ld. AR referred the decision of Hon'ble
Bombay High Court in the case of CIT V/s Reliance Industries Ltd. (2010) 8
Taxmann.com 218 (Bom) and submitted that no disallowance under section 14A is
called for when there is no fact of having incurred any expenditure for the purpose of
earning the dividend income. Ld. AR also referred the decision of Hon'ble Bombay
High Court in the case of CIT V/s Glenmark Pharmaceutical Ltd. (2013) 30
Taxmann.com 167 (Bom), the decision of Hon'ble Punjab and Haryana High Court in the
case of CIT V/s Hero Cycles Ltd (2010) 189 Taxman 50 (Punj & Har) and the decision
of Hon'ble Mumbai High Court in the case of Justice Sam P. Bharucha V/s Addl CIT
(2012) 25 Taxmann.Com 381(Mum). He further submitted that the ITAT, Delhi Bench
of the Tribunal in the case of Modern Info Technology P.Ltd. V/s ITO in ITA
No.4294/Del/2012 (AY-2009-10) observed and held that no disallowance u/s 14A is
called for when the assessee has not incurred and claimed any expenditure for earning
the exempt income. Ld. AR also referred the following decisions :


(a) CIT V/s Trishul Investment Ltd (215 CTR 96) (Mad);
(b) Smt. Neera Jain V/s ACIT in ITA No.1861/Mum/2009;
(c ) Rajesh Ramswarop Agarwal V/s ITO in ITA No.5157/Mum/2008;


He further submitted that the decision of Macintosh Finance Estates Ltd (supra) relied
upon by the ld. CIT(A) is distinguishable as in that case the assessee was not an
investor but was a Non-Banking Finance Company which paid interest on borrowed
funds and claimed it as deduction u/s 37(1) read with section 36(1)(iii) of the Act and
also derived the dividend income. The Tribunal held that interest on borrowings used
for acquiring stock-in-trade which was allowable as business expenditure after reducing
the amount of dividend received on shares held as "stock-in-trade". However, the
assessee is an investor and not a trader, engaged in the purchase and sale of shares.
That the profit on sale of shares has been assessed as capital gains. That the assessee
has capitalized the interest paid on purchase of shares as a part of cost of acquisition
and never claimed deduction or allowed deduction thereof u/s 57/37(1)/36(1)(iii) of the
I.T.A. No.2393/Mum/2012
4


Act. Further, the only income which was derived from those shares on which the
interest has been paid is short capital gain which is taxable under the provisions of Act.
Ld.AR submitted that the provisions of section 14A is not applicable and the interest
should be considered as cost of acquisition and the short term capital gains be
computed accordingly.

6. On the other hand, ld. DR relied on the order of ld. CIT(A).


7. We have carefully considered the submissions of ld. Representatives of the
parties and the orders of authorities below. We have also considered the cases cited
before us (supra). On perusal of the details of the loan borrowed by the assessee
from the concerned Financial Companies and the investment made in respect of shares
which are under consideration, the details given hereinabove in para 3, we agree that
there is a clear nexus between the interest paid and the allotment of shares of NTPC
Ltd., NDTV Ltd, and Datamatics Ltd. to the assessee and also income on sale of those
shares has been considered under the head "Short term capital gain/short term capital
loss". We observe that the assessee has considered the payment of interest in respect
of shares for which the loan was taken as cost of acquisition of those shares. Therefore,
the assessee has reduced full value of cost of acquisition from the sale consideration
while computing the capital gain. It is not in dispute that the assessee has capitalized
the interest and considered it as part of cost of cost of acquisition as per section 48 of
the Act. The department has not disputed the contention of ld.AR that the assessee has
not claimed the said interests as deduction u/s 57/37(1)/36(1)(iii) of the Act. Similar
issue came before the Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case of Trishul Investment
Ltd (supra), wherein the order of the Tribunal was confirmed by Their Lordships as
under :
"The Tribunal correctly held that the interest paid for acquisition of shares would
partake character of cost of share and therefore the same was rightly capitalised
along with the cost of acquisition of shares. There is no denial regarding the
borrowed money for the acquisition of shares by the assessee. The Tribunal
correctly held that the interest payable thereon should be added to the cost of
acquisition of shares. The reasons given by the Tribunal are based on valid
materials and evidence. Under these circumstances, we do not find any error or
legal infirmity in the order of the Tribunal so as to warrant interference."

We also observe that the ITAT Mumbai Bench in the case of Smt.Neera Jain (supra) has
also considered the similar issue and directed AO to treat interest paid by the assessee
for acquiring shares as part of cost of acquisitions by observing as under :
I.T.A. No.2393/Mum/2012
5


"There was no dispute that the entire loan was borrowed for the purpose of
acquiring the shares of Punjab National Bank and NTPC. Also that immediately
after allotment of shares, money refunded by both the companies was refunded
to the financiers. The Tribunal held that the fact that applied shares were not
allotted in full will not deprive the assessee from claiming the entire interest paid
as part of the cost of acquisition of the shares allowed, as money borrowed has
direct nexus with acquisition of shares. The Tribunal directed the assessing
officer to treat the interest paid by the assessee to both the financiers as part of
cost of acquisitions of shares allow the same as a deduction."

Similar view has also been taken by the Tribunal Mumbai Bench in Rajesh Ramswarop
Agarwal (supra) has held as under :


"It is not disputed that the assessee had borrowed funds for investing in IPO and
the shares acquired through IPO were sold. Therefore, whatever the interest
was paid for the period till the date of allotment of shares had to be treated as
part of cost of acquisition of shares. It is not disputed that final allotment of
shares was fully covered from own funds and, therefore, no borrowed funds
were allocated towards allotment of shares. We, accordingly, confirm the order
of Ld. CIT(A)."



Considering the above cases and also the cases cited before us (supra) we hold that the
entire interest has been paid by the assessee as a part of cost of acquisition of shares
allotted, is to be treated as cost of acquisition because on perusal of all the details
from the table as mentioned hereinabove in para 3 there is a direct nexus between the
borrowed money and the cost of acquisition of shares by assessee. The assessee is
entitled to capitalize the said interest as part of cost of acquisition as per section 48 of
the Act. Hence, short term capital gain as accrued to the assessee on the sale of shares
of NTPC Ltd., NDTV Ltd, and Datamatics Ltd has to be considered after considering the
payment of the said interest as part of cost of acquisition. Since, the short term capital
gain is taxable under the Act, we agree with the ld.AR that the provisions of section 14A
is not applicable on the facts and circumstances of the case. Hence, we allow grounds of
appeal taken by assessee by reversing the orders of authorities below.


8. In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed.

Order pronounced in the open court on the 9th October, 2013


9th October, 2013

Sd sd
( /SANJAY ARORA) (.. /B.R.MITTAL)
/ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER / JUDICIAL MEMBER
Mumbai; on this 9th day of October, 2013

I.T.A. No.2393/Mum/2012
6



. ../ SRL, Sr. PS
/Copy of the Order forwarded to :
1. / The Appellant
2. / The Respondent.
3. () / The CIT(A)-
4. / CIT
5. , , / DR, ITAT,
Mumbai
6. / Guard file.
/ BY ORDER,
True copy
(Asstt. Registrar)
, / ITAT, Mumbai

No penalty for delayed audit completion if assessee wasn't authorized to appoint an auditor

IT: Where it was not within assessee's domain to have auditor appointed by registrar or State Government to complete audit within specified date, no penalty under section 271B should be imposed on assessee