ITO can't act as an Excise Officer to determine quantity of production for making addition of unexpl

IT: Where Assessing Officer verified registers maintained under Central Excise Act and doubted accuracy of figures mentioned therein, he was totally unsuited for undertaking exact production of material as same was outside his purview

Benefit of SSI exemption would be available from date of application to register trade mark

Excise & Customs: As per section 23 of Trade Marks Act, registration becomes effective from date on which application was filed and hence, in case of branded goods, trademark would belong to assessee from date of filing application and SSI-exemption would be available accordingly

CESTAT set aside penalty on failure of assessee to pay ST as it had paid 25% if demand as penalty un

Service Tax : Where penalty under section 78 was paid at 25 per cent of service tax within 1 month from adjudication order, assessee could not be asked to pay any further penalty under section 76 or 78, even prior to 10-5-2008

No disallowance of interest if AO failed to prove that borrowed sum was passed on to affiliate witho

IT: In absence of any finding to effect that amount borrowed by assessee from financial institutions was straight away passed on to sister concern without levying interest, interest on borrowed amount could not be disallowed

Units located adjacent to each other with common ST registration may take credit of invoices issued

Cenvat Credit : Where two units are located adjacent to each other and have common service tax registration, practice of taking credit belonging to either of units without considering whether invoice was addressed to Head Office or to units is valid; department cannot seek segregation of credit along with separate registration

Bending iron and steel to create anchor rods won't amount to manufacture under Karnataka VAT Act

CST & VAT : Karnataka VAT - Where assessee manufactured RCC pole clamps, anchor rods, cross arms and H-frames out of iron and steel by just bending of iron and steel and supplied same to a purchaser, process undertaken by assessee could not be considered as any manufacturing activity and, therefore, levy of tax should be only at 4 per cent as declared goods

Revenue couldn't recover disputed demand when assessee had filed stay petition during pendency of ap

IT: Where assessee's appeals were pending before appellate authority in respect of assessment order and after filing of said appeals, assessee filed stay petition under section 220(6), revenue was not justified in calling upon assessee to pay demand

Sum received under bogus sale and purchase of shares was an undisclosed income: HC

IT: Where assessee could not explain receipt of alleged share transactions profits credited in his bank accounts, then sale proceeds had to be added as income of assessee under section 68

Assessee had to pay customs duty with interest as it failed to take extension for fulfilling export

Excise & Customs : Where assessee has failed to fulfil export obligation in time and has also not applied for extension thereof, demand of customs duty along with interest is valid

No insurance claim for damages as vehicle owner didn't apply for registration on expiry of temporary

Motor Vehcile Act : Where an accident had taken place, petitioner as owner of vehicle would not be entitled to claim compensation for damages in respect of vehicle when admittedly vehicle was being driven on date of accident without any valid registration

Mobile trader has to make advertisement every year to remain in limelight; such exp. is allowable as

IT: Annual expenditure incurred on advertisement to make and keep public informed and, aware as also to remain in limelight, would be revenue expenditure

Sale of Scented Supari wasn't eligible for set off under Bombay Sales Tax Rules since it wasn't liab

CST & VAT: Maharashtra VAT - Where assessee effected sale of scented supari against declaration form N-14B and claimed set off under rule 42H of Bombay Sales Tax Rules, since goods sold were not liable to tax under Bombay Sales Tax Act, assessee was not eligible for set off

AO couldn't make provisional attachment of properties without showing that assessee would not pay VA

CST & VAT : Gujarat VAT - Where Assessing Authority passed order under section 45 on assessee attaching its properties on ground that a huge tax demand was likely to arise against it for unpaid tax, since revenue had not placed any material that if ultimately any additional tax liability was finalized, assessee would not pay such taxes, resorting to such power of attachment would not be permissible

CESTAT remanded matter where test results furnished before it weren't made available to AO

Excise & Customs : Where test certificates and results were made available to CESTAT and had not been produced before adjudicating authority and appellate authority, matter was to be remanded back to adjudicating authority