Friday, 10 October 2014

Pakistan Exports Rs 233.95 Million Items To India In First Week Of October

Pakistan has exported items worth Rs 233.95 million to India during first week of October from 1st -7th to India via Wagha Border despite the Indian aggression on borders.


As per available documents, Pakistan exported dried fruits, salt, cement, gypsum, cotton, scrap and lime stone.As the winter is going to start, Pakistan has exported 106 metric tonnes of nuts worth Rs 20 million to India via Wahga Border.

The documents show that Pakistan exported 2505 metric tonnes of dried fruits (dates, figs and guavas) worth Rs 119 million to India during the first week of October.


Moreover, 23 metric tonnes of plants worth Rs 870,977 was exported to India from 1-7 October.


According to details, Pakistan has exported 511 metric tonnes of rock salt worth Rs 1.67 million, while 9015 metric tonnes of gypsum worth Rs 14.36 million was sold to India via Wagha Border during first week of October.


Besides that Pakistan has also exported 371 metric tonnes of lime stone worth Rs 1 million while cement worth Rs 9.49 million was exported via Wagha border.


Almost 760 metric tonnes of aluminum ores worth Rs 1.32 million were exported through Wagha border during 1-7 October.


Pakistan also exported disodium carbonate and hydrogen peroxide to India worth Rs 1.16 million and Rs 2.58 million respectively.


As per available documents, Pakistan exported scrap worth Rs 4.28 million, cotton (not combed) worth Rs 22.8 million and glass worth Rs 33.9 million to India during first seven days of October.As a whole, Pakistan exported items worth Rs 233.95 million with a total weight of 17,171 metric tonnes to India via Wahga border.


Source:- customstoday.com.pk





Indian Coal Imports Aren't A Big Enough Boost

Mr Clyde Russell of Reuters wrote that Australian coal miners desperate for good news got a double boost recently, but India's cancelling of private mining blocks and Indonesia's new export rules are a salve rather than a cure for the industry's woes.


An Indian court ruling scrapping the allocations of coal blocks to private operators will undoubtedly cut production and boost demand for imported fuel. And it's also likely that new export permit rules being introduced by Indonesia will at least temporarily lower shipments from the world's largest exporter of thermal coal for use in power plants. Also, it remains the case that many Indian power stations are critically short of coal, given the long-standing inability of state producer CIL and the railways to mine and transport adequate supplies.


All of this seems like manna from heaven for Australian coal miners, the majority of whom are unprofitable given the 25% decline this year in the benchmark Newcastle Port thermal coal price to USD 64.91 a tonne last week, a fresh 5 year low.


But there are a few reasons to be sceptical as to whether this will be a significant boost for coal miners, or just a serendipitous lolly in a bowl of bile.


The operating blocks among those, which were expected to produce an estimated 52 million tonnes in the current fiscal year, will be returned to Coal India by the end of March 2015. However, it's likely that output from them will start to tail off prior to the handover, and that it won't be ramped up quickly by CIL once it assumes control, given it will take time for the state behemoth to get to grips with the new assets.


All up, the coal shortage in India is likely to grow substantially, and may exceed even the top end of the government's estimate of between 185 million to 265 million tonnes by the 2016-17 fiscal year.


India imported 168.4 million tonnes in the fiscal year ended March 2014, and researchers OreTeam expect this to rise to 210 million in the year starting April 2015, while Fitch unit India Ratings & Research says imports may rise as far as 230 million. The OreTeam forecast is a reasonable import demand assumption, and there is little doubt that India could use all 210 million tonnes of imports, and possibly even as much as the India Ratings estimate.


But the big question is whether the already strained port and rail infrastructure is ready to handle such an increase in volumes.


The Indian experience is generally that capacity increases are realised, but seldom in the time frames initially envisaged. There are also problems in getting projects coordinated, with the risk that a port may be ready to receive more cargoes but the rail not yet able to transport it.


According to data from trader mjunction, India's imports surged 19% to 16 million tonnes in September. But even this jump in imports, if maintained, would result in annual imports of 192 million tonnes, which is higher than the 2013-14 outcome, but short of forecasts. It may be more realistic that imports could struggle to rise in the coming fiscal year above 200 million tonnes.


That would still sound fairly good to coal miners, especially those outside Indonesia. According to the coal industry, new rules may cut Indonesian exports by between 15% and 20% in October from September. According to the Indonesian Coal Mining Association, the Southeast Asian nation shipped between 25 and 30 million tonnes in September. Indonesian miners are worried that the regulations, aimed at ensuring compliance with laws and taxes, will drive some struggling companies to the wall.


Notwithstanding the issues surrounding the new export permits, it's likely this will be only a temporary situation, meaning that the scope for rival miners in Australia, South Africa and even Colombia will be limited.


Coal from those suppliers is also more expensive to land in India than cargoes from Indonesia, meaning there may be some reluctance on the part of buyers to pay more that they are used to, even though prices are currently depressed.


Certainly, the coal futures market hasn't priced in rising prices further along the curve, suggesting that investors haven't yet bought into the idea of a demand-led revival.


Source:- steelguru.com





HC denied export rebate as assessee didn’t submit original/duplicate copy of ARE-1 to prove export o

Excise & Customs : Where assessee has failed to prove export of goods by original or duplicate copy of ARE-1 and there is no correlation between triplicate copy of ARE-1 and Shipping Bill, assessee cannot be allowed export rebate


Interest received by co-operative bank on its voluntary reserves with banks is eligible for sec. 80P

IT: Interest income received by a co-operative bank on its voluntary reserve in bank, bonds and small scale industrial corporation is eligible for deduction under section 80P


No denial of interest on delayed refund of deposits due to pendency of appeal; HC grants interest at

Service Tax : Where assessee made deposit pending investigation and demand confirmed by department was ultimately set aside, assessee was entitled to refund of said deposit and in case of delay beyond 3 months in grant of refund, assessee would be entitled to interest at rate of 15% per annum


Sec. 80-IB relief available to assessee as its activity of clinical research was approved by prescri

IT: Where activity of clinical trials was duly approved by prescribed authority, only after complete satisfaction as to nature of activity, infrastructure of company and its past record and extended further twice, deduction under section 80-IB could not be denied


No writ against pre-deposit order of Tribunal, as such order was appealable before High Court

Excise & Customs : Since application for waiver of pre-deposit is an application filed during pendency of appeal, any order passed thereon is an order passed in appeal by Appellate Tribunal; hence, pre-deposit order of Tribunal is appealable before High Court under section 35G and accordingly, writ would not be maintainable


Acceptance of share application money in cash couldn’t be deemed as loan or deposit in violation of

IT : Money accepted as share application money cannot be termed as loan or deposit for purpose of section 269SS read with section 271D


High Court bars unregistered advocates from appearing before UP VAT authorities

CST & VAT: Petition challenging any person, who is not a U.P. registered advocate, should not be permitted to appear before authorities under VAT Act


SEBI issues clarification on investment limits in Govt. debt for FPIs

SEBI : Clarification on Government Debt Investment Limits


Now remittance to Prime Minister's Relief fund can be made through Exchange houses

FEMA/ILT : Memorandum of Instructions for Opening and Maintenance of Rupee / Foreign Currency Vostro Accounts of Non-Resident Exchange Houses


Excise officers shall continue to conduct audit as they are empowered to do so under excise provisio

EXCISE & CUSTOMS LAWS : Section 37 of the Central Excise Act, 1944, Read with Rule 22 of The Central Excise Rules, 2002 - Power of Central Government to Make Rules - Audit by Officers of Central Excise


Reassessment upheld as bogus purchases unearthed during survey weren’t subject matter of scrutiny pr

IT: Where in course of survey it was found that assessee made certain purchases under bogus bills, since occasion to consider genuineness of those purchase bills was never a subject matter of scrutiny in proceedings under section 143(3), initiation of reassessment proceedings in such a situation was justified


Addition due to unaccounted consignment sales was against the Accounting Standard issued by ICAI, sa

IT : Addition made to assessee's income on account of consignment sales not included in turnover was against guidelines issued by ICAI and thus same deserved to be deleted


CLB ordered transfer of shares to petitioner as it had obtained rights for lost shares after paying

CL: Where petitioner insurer had obtained right in respect of lost shares of respondent-company after paying insurance claim to insured and company had no objection to transfer of shares, shares were to be transferred in name of petitioner


Ex-parte order didn’t violate principle of natural justice as assessee failed to avail of hearing op

Excise & Customs : Plea of violation of principles of natural justice is rejected, if opportunity was given, but not availed by assessee


HC deletes sec. 68 addition as assessee had furnished records to justify creditworthiness of share a

IT: Where identity of share applicants had been established and their bank accounts, IT returns and balance sheet in addition to confirmation letters were produced, addition under section 68 was to be deleted


HC dismissed order levying penalty for evasion of tax as it was barred by limitation period of 3 yea

CST & VAT: Where Assessing Authority initiated penalty proceedings against assessee on 19-1-2010 and thereafter passed penalty order on 5-5-2014, in view of proviso to section 67(1), penalty order was beyond period of limitation