Tuesday 25 June 2013

Profit from share transactions taxable as ‘Capital Gains’ if shares are in form of investment

IT : Where assessee earned gain on purchase and sale of equity shares and mutual funds and its intention was to purchase shares and mutual funds for holding them as investment, gain in question was assessable under head 'short-term capital gain'


Exp. allowed in preceding years to be allowed in current year too if facts are similar, rules HC

IT : Where in preceding year disallowances were deleted, same could be followed in current year, facts being same


Renting services are eligible for input service credit if used further for sub-letting

ST : In case of sub-letting, service tax paid on rent paid to landlord is available as input service credit subject to maintenance of documentary evidence in that regard


Report of DG is only recommendatory in nature and it’s not binding on the CCI

Competition Act : Report of DG is only recommendatory in nature and is not binding on CCI and, therefore, it is not that in every case where CCI disagrees with report of DG, it has to order further investigation


Genuine transaction can’t be alleged as a colorable device merely because it reduces the burden of t

IT : Once a transaction is genuine and traded at proper valuation, even if entered with a motive to avoid tax, would not become coloruable device subject to any disqualification


[Indian Custom Circular] : Regarding Introduction of Risk Management Systems (RMS) in Exports

Circular No. 23/2013 - Customs




F.No.450/28/2011-Cus.IV

Government of India

Ministry of Finance

Department of Revenue

Central Board of Excise


***


New Delhi, Dated 24th June, 2013


To

All Chief Commissioners of Customs/Customs (Prev)

All Chief Commissisoner of Customs and Central Excise

All Commissioners of Customs/Customs (Prev)

All Commissioners of Customs and Central Excise

All Director Generals under CBEC




Sir/Madam

Sub: Introduction of Risk Management Systems (RMS) in Exports – regarding.


Attention is invited to the Board Circular No.43/2005-Cus dated 24.11.2005 whereby Risk Management System (RMS) was introduced in Imports as a trade facilitation measure and for selective interdiction of high risk consignments for Customs control.




2. Implementation of RMS in Imports has been one of the most significant steps in the ongoing Business Process Re-engineering initiative of the department. In continuation of this initiative, the Board has now decided to introduce RMS in exports in Customs locations where the Indian Customs EDI Systems (ICES) is operational. The RMS in exports will enable low risk consignments to be cleared based on self assessment of the declarations by exporters. This will enable the department to enhance the level of facilitation and speed up the process of cargo clearance. By expediting the clearance of compliant export cargo, the RMS for exports will contribute to reduction in dwell time, thereby achieving the desired objective of reducing the transaction cost in order to make the business internationally competitive. The RMS in Exports is scheduled for implementation from 15.07.2013 onwards.




3. The RMS for exports is developed with the following components (i) ensuring appropriate control measures for proper and speedy disbursement of drawback and other export incentives (ii) effective utilization of human resources, to match the workload with the resources available (iii) ensuring proper and expeditious implementation of existing control over export under the applicable Allied Acts and Rules.




4 With the introduction of the RMS in exports, the present practice of routine verification of self-assessment and examination of Shipping Bills will be discontinued

and the focus will be on quality assessment, examination and post clearance audit (PCA) of Shipping Bills selected by the Risk Management System.




5. Shipping Bills filed electronically into ICES through the Service Centre or the ICEGATE will be processed by RMS. The RMS will process the data through a series of steps/corridors and produce an electronic output for the ICES. This output from RMS will determine the flow of the Shipping Bill in ICES i.e. whether the Shipping Bill will be taken up for Customs control (verification of self-assessment or examination or both) or to be given “Let Export Order” directly after payment of Export duty (if any) without any verification of self-assessment or examination. The RMS will also provide instructions for Appraising Officer/Superintendent, Examining Officer/Inspector or the Let Export Order (LEO) Officer, wherever necessary. The decisions communicated by the RMS on the need for verification of self-assessment and/or examination and the appraising and examination instructions communicated by the RMS have be followed by the field formations. It is possible that in a few cases, the field formations might decide to apply a particular treatment to the Shipping Bill which is at variance with the instructions received for the RMS owing to risks which are not factored in the RMS. Such a course of action shall however be taken only with the prior approval of the jurisdictional Commissioner of Customs or an officer authorised by him for this purpose, who shall not be below the rank of Addl./Joint Commissioner of Customs, and after recording the reason for the same. A brief remark on the reasons and particulars of Commissioner’s authorization should be made by the officer examining the goods in the departmental comments in the EDI system.




6. Board has decided to implement RMS in export in two phases. In the first phase the RMS will process the data and provide the output to ICES only up to goods examination stage. In the second phase, the RMS will also process the Shipping Bill data after the Export general Manifest (EGM) is filed electronically and provide output to ICES for selection of shipping Bills for Drawback scrutiny and Post Clearance Audit (PCA).




7. With the implementation of export RMS, a Post Clearance Audit (PCA) function will be introduced in respect of exports after the LEO is given for export consignment. The objective of PCA is to monitor, maintain and enhance compliance levels, while reducing the dwell time of cargo. The RMS will select the Shipping Bills for audit, after issue of LEO, and these selected Shipping Bills will be directed to the audit officers for scrutiny by the ICES. It may be noted that the auditors are specifically being instructed to scrutinize declarations with reference to exports incentives, duty drawback and other compliance requirements Wherever necessary, RMS will provide instructions for audit Officers. In case any possible short levies or undue claim of export incentives are noticed, the officer will issue a Consultative Letter setting out the ground for their views to the exporters/CHAs. Audit Officers should also scrutinize declarations with reference to data quality and advise the exporters/ CHAs suitably where the quality of their declarations is found deficient. Such advise is expected to be followed and will be monitored by the Local Risk Managers (LRM).




8 As in the case of Import, the national management of the Risk Management systems shall be the responsibility of the Risk Management Division. There will be a single Local Risk Manager (Admin) for a location for both import and export.




9. The implementation of RMS for exports will necessitate reorganization for staff. Board desires the Chief Commissisoner of Customs to undertake a comprehensive re-organization of the officers deployed for processing of Shipping Bills. The present appraising facilities should be right-sized in tune with the quantum of Shipping Bills coming for assessment. A separate PCA section needs to be created and sufficient staff should be diverted to the Post Clearance Audit. The strength of the staff for examination of cargo would also be required to be readjusted.




10. With the introduction of RMS in exports, the selection of Shipping Bills for verification of Self-assessment and/or examination will be based on the output given by RMS to ICES. Accordingly the examination and assessment norms contained in the Board’s Circulars No. 06/2002 –Cus dated 23.01.2002, 01/2009-Cus dated 13.01.2009 and 28/2012-Customs dated 16.11.2012 would stand modified to that extent. However, owing to some technical reasons if the RMS fails to provide output to ICES or RMS output is not received at ICES end in time, the existing norms of assessment and examination prescribed by the aforementioned circulars will be applicable.




11. To begain with, RMS in Exports will be introduced w.e.f. 15.7.2013 at ICD Mulund and ICD Patparganj. With the implementation of RMS in exports the existing facilitation scheme viz. Accelerated Clearance System vide Circular No.30/2003-Cus dated 4.4.2003. would be phased out. As the deployment of the export RMS is likely to take place in a phased manner across the ICES locations, the existing facilitation scheme will continue to be operative in each Customs station until the operationalisation of the export RMS at the station.




12. Board desires DG (Systems) to forward the detailed instruction/draft public notice to field formation separately.




13. Any difficulty in implementation of these instructions should be brought notice of the Board immediately.




Yours faithfully,

( R.P. Singh )

Director (Customs)





24X7 Customs Clearance Facility For Export Cargo

25-Jun-2013


NEW DELHI, 25 JUNE: Beginning 1 July, Customs clearance of all export goods will take place on a 24x7 basis from four major air cargo complexes/airports in Bangalore, Chennai, Delhi and Mumbai, the Union finance ministry announced today.



Thus, all exports including those made under export incentives scheme as well as duty drawback scheme will now be able to be move out of the country on a 24x7 basis. The government expects this initiative to greatly facilitate the exporting community and boost the country’s exports by reducing dwell time and enabling exporters to meet their deadlines, a statement from the ministry said. The expansion of the 24x7 facility at the four major air cargo complexes/airports follows on the heels of similar customs clearance facility for exports made under free shipping bills, i.e. without claiming export incentives with effect from 1 June 2013 from all 13 EDI connected air cargo complexes/airports in the country.



These 13 air cargo complexes/airports are Ahmedabad, Amritsar, Cochin, Calicut, Coimbatore, Goa, Hyderabad, Indore, Jaipur, Kolkata, Nashik, Vizag and Thiruvananthapuram.



The extension of clearance facility for imports and exports has been under the consideration of the government for some time. Last year from 1 September 2012, the Customs began functioning on a 24x7 basis to clear select export consignments under free shipping bills as well as identified import consignments which were facilitated by its electronic risk assessment system.


Source:-www.thestatesman.net





Rupee Near Record Low; Dealers Watch For Rbi

The rupee was weaker in early trade on Wednesday, with dealers watching for central bank intervention as the currency closes in on its record low.



At 9:02 a.m., the rupee was at 59.78/79 to a dollar versus Tuesday's close of 59.66/67. It had hit a record low of 59.9850 last week.


Source:-in.reuters.com





Uncompetitive Imports Call For Relook At India's China Trade Policy

KOLKATA: Is India enriching China and allowing it to occupy our land?



A study shows India pays more for goods from China that it could buy from elsewhere at a lower price since the era of cheap Chinese goods appears to be coming to an end. The land of dragons has struggled to keep its cost competitiveness going because of rising wages, land prices and taxes. The ascent of the renminbi or yuan has also made the world's largest manufacturer more expensive. The Sino-Indian bilateral trade took off during the last decade to nearly $70 billion (about 4.2 lakh crore) at the end of 2012 and is expected to touch $100 billion (about 6 lakh crore) in 2015. It certainly looks impressive, but the magnitude of uncompetitive imports calls for a relook at the bilateral trade policy, argues Prof SK Mohanty, who did a study on Sino-India trade relationship on behalf of the Reserve Bank of India.



The volume of uncompetitive imports from China rose from $4.49 billion in 2007 to $7.15 billion in 2008, but declined to $6.6 billion in 2009. The relative size of this to total imports was very high, ranging from 18.6% in 2007 to 25.4% in 2008. In fact, nearly one-third of 3,876 items imported by India in 2009 proved costlier.



"It is a matter of concern as the share of uncompetitive products in total is increasing over a period of time. They are both in terms of the number of products imported and also in value terms," says Prof Mohanty of Research and Information System for Developing Countries in the study titled 'India China Bilateral Trade Relationship'.

Uncompetitive imports call for relook at India's China trade policy

Uncompetitive imports are concentrated in four sectors -- chemicals, textiles, base metals and machinery with about 75-80% share of total uncompetitive imports during 2007-09. Imports of minerals, plastics, gems & jewelleries, and automobile parts from China have also turned out to be uncompetitive. The combined share of these eight sectors exceeded 93% of total uncompetitive imports during 2007-09.



Many believe the rising labour cost in China is to be blamed primarily. In fact, China is gradually withdrawing from the lower end of the textile sector, and if the trend continues, the production base of textiles and clothing will slowly shift to other countries, as has been the case with the textile industries of a number of East Asian countries in the past.



This could prove a blessing for India which has a large textile sector. Prof Mohanty suggests India should start preparing itself by getting into partnership with foreign firms to establish production centres on its shore for mass production of garments. "The Chinese phase-out from the garment industry may be an opportunity for India to replace it in the global market in a phased manner."



The automobile industry both in India and China has expanded rapidly during the last two decades and India enjoys a competitive edge in auto components, small-cars and two-wheeler segments. However, the study showed that India's imports from China in these product segments are turning out to be uncompetitive, and imports of these products can be managed efficiently from other competitive suppliers. India is also emerging as competitive player in the niche area of auto designing, which is related to the IT sector.


Source:-economictimes.indiatimes.com





RPM was most appropriate if items bought from AE were sold to unrelated parties

IT/ILT : Where assessee buys products from its AEs and sells to unrelated parties without any further processing, RPM is most appropriate method to determine ALP


Coconut Exports Up 26% This Year

25-Jun-2013


Export of coconut and coconut products (other than coir and coir products) reached a record Rs 1,050 crore in 2012-13. Total export registered a grew 26 per cent in value and 32 per cent in volume, compared with the previous financial year, according to the Coconut Development Board (CDB).



The country exported 58,000 tonnes of activated carbon worth Rs 550 crore, constituting 50 per cent of the total export earnings. Good quality shell-based activated carbon has great demand in North America, South America, Eastern Europe, Southeast Asia and West Asia.



In view of the economic revival and trade increase, India is doing much more trade with American countries in addition to the traditional markets. Coconut shell-based activated carbon is notified under the focus product scheme of the Union government and becomes eligible for a two per cent export incentive from January 1, 2013. Ever since the government had notified the CDB as an Export Promotion Council for all coconut products from April 1, 2009, exports saw an average annual growth of 35 per cent.



The board currently has around 1,000 registered exporters. It aims to achieve Rs 5,000 crore worth coconut product exports by the end of the 12th five-year Plan.


Source:-www.business-standard.com





Chandy Gets Clean Chit In Palm Oil Import Case

25-Jun-2013


KOCHI: The Kerala high court Tuesday gave a clean chit to chief minister Oommen Chandy in the palm oil import case, dismissing a petition filed by CPM veteran VS Achuthanandan and former bureaucrat and legislator KJ Alphonse.





The two petitioners had approached the high court to set aside the verdict of the Thrissur vigilance court in May last year that accepted a report giving a clean chit to Chandy by a vigilance probe team.



The vigilance probe team had concluded that Chandy had no role in the import of palm oil.



Alphonse was an independent legislator supported by the Left during 2006-11.



The import of 15,000 tonnes of palm oil was undertaken in 1992.



The case was registered in 1999 when the CPM, led by EK Nayanar, was in power. The vigilance department had earlier submitted a report that there was nothing in the case that could indict Chandy.



Former chief minister K Karunakaran, then food minister TH Mustafa and bureaucrats PJ Thomas and Jiji Thompson were charged with causing a loss of Rs.2.32 crore to the exchequer by importing palm oil from Malaysia at an enhanced price.


Source:-timesofindia.indiatimes.com





Export incentives from vendor for goods purchased for export can't be deducted from cost of goods so

IT/ILT: Where assessee entered into international transactions of export of finished goods to its AE and it had purchased finished goods from one 'G' for export to AE, export incentive received in respect of such purchases from 'G' was not deductible from cost of goods sold to AE, whereas assessee would be entitled for deduction of rebate received from 'G' from cost of goods sold to AE


Royalty paid to parent Co. on AE sales couldn’t be disallowed if similar payment on non-AE sales acc

IT/ILT : Where TPO accepts arm's length nature of royalty paid to AE(foreign parent company) on third party sales as a % of sales, he can't disallow royalty paid to AE at same % on AE sales on the ground that no benefit was derived from royalty on AE sales as AE sales are sale by assessee to itself. Such disallowance can't be made unless TPO able to demonstrate that royalty was already included in price of purchases made by AE from assessees


Income from production of hybrid seeds from basic seeds is agricultural income and is exempt from ta

IT : Income from activity of production of hybrid seeds from basic seeds would be agricultural income exempt under section 10


Sum collected to be regarded as inclusive of service-tax if invoice doesn’t show the tax separately

ST : Where service tax was not shown separately in invoice, sums collected by assessee were to be regarded as cum-tax and service tax was to be determined by making back calculations


Employees' contribution of EPF and ESI is allowable if remitted before the due date of filing return

IT: Employee's contribution under EPF and ESI Act, remitted after due dates prescribed under said statutes, but before extended due date for filing return under section 139(1), is allowable as deduction


Customs Circular No 22/2013 dated 24-06-2013

Government of India

Ministry of Finance

Department of Revenue

Central Board of Excise and Customs


Circular No. 23/2013-Customs


New Delhi, Dated 24th June, 2013


To

All Chief Commissioners of Customs /Customs (Prev)

All Chief Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise

All Commissioners of Customs /Customs (Prev)

All Commissioners of Customs and Central Excise

All Director Generals under CBEC


Sir/Madam


Sub: Introduction of Risk Management Systems (RMS) in Exports–regarding.


Attention is invited to the Board Circular No.43/2005-Cus dated 24.11.2005 whereby Risk Management System (RMS) was introduced in Imports as a trade facilitation measure and for selective interdiction of high risk consignments for Customs control.


2. Implementation of RMS in Imports has been one of the most significant steps in the ongoing Business Process Re-engineering initiative of the department. In continuation of this initiative, the Board has now decided to introduce RMS in exports in Customs locations where the Indian Customs EDI Systems (ICES) is operational. The RMS in exports will enable low risk consignments to be cleared based on self assessment of the declarations by exporters. This will enable the department to enhance the level of facilitation and speed up the process of cargo clearance. By expediting the clearance of compliant export cargo, the RMS for exports will contribute to reduction in dwell time, thereby achieving the desired objective of reducing the transaction cost in order to make the business internationally competitive. The RMS in Exports is scheduled for implementation from 15.07.2013 onwards.


3. The RMS for exports is developed with the following components (i) ensuring appropriate control measures for proper and speedy disbursement of drawback and other export incentives (ii) effective utilization of human resources, to match the workload with the resources available (iii) ensuring proper and expeditious implementation of existing control over export under the applicable Allied Acts and Rules.


4. With the introduction of the RMS in exports, the present practice of routine verification of self-assessment and examination of Shipping Bills will be discontinued and the focus will be on quality assessment, examination and post clearance audit (PCA) of Shipping Bills selected by the Risk Management System.


5. Shipping Bills filed electronically into ICES through the Service Centre or the ICEGATE will be processed by RMS. The RMS will process the data through a series of steps/corridors and produce an electronic output for the ICES. This output from RMS will determine the flow of the Shipping Bill in ICES i.e. whether the Shipping Bill will be taken up for Customs control (verification of self-assessment or examination or both) or to be given “Let Export Order” directly after payment of Export duty (if any) without any verification of self-assessment or examination. The RMS will also provide instructions for Appraising Officer/Superintendent, Examining Officer/Inspect or or the Let Export Order (LEO) Officer, wherever necessary. The decisions communicated by the RMS on the need for verification of self-assessment and/or examination and the appraising and examination instructions communicated by the RMS have be followed by the field formations. It is possible that in a few cases, the field formations might decide to apply a particular treatment to the Shipping Bill which is at variance with the instructions received for the RMS owing to risks which are not factored in the RMS. Such a course of action shall however be taken only with the prior approval of the jurisdictional Commissioner of Customs or an officer authorised by him for this purpose, who shall not be below the rank of Addl./Joint Commissioner of Customs, and after recording the reason for the same. A brief remark on the reasons and particulars of Commissioner’s authorization should be made by the officer examining the goods in the departmental comments in the EDI system.


6. Board has decided to implement RMS in export in two phases. In the first phase the RMS will process the data and provide the output to ICES only up to goods examination stage. In the second phase, the RMS will also process the Shipping Bill data after the Export general Manifest (EGM) is filed electronically and provide output to ICES for selection of shipping Bills for Drawback scrutiny and Post Clearance Audit (PCA).


7. With the implementation of export RMS, a Post Clearance Audit (PCA) function will be introduced in respect of export s after the LEO is given for export consignment. The objective of PCA is to monitor, maintain and enhance compliance levels, while reducing the dwell time of cargo. The RMS will select the Shipping Bills for audit, after issue of LEO, and these selected Shipping Bills will be directed to the audit officers for scrutiny by the ICES. It may be noted that the auditors are specifically being instructed to scrutinize declarations with reference to exports incentives, duty drawback and other compliance requirements Wherever necessary, RMS will provide instructions for audit Officers. In case any possible short levies or undue claim of export incentives are noticed, the officer will issue a Consultative Letter setting out the ground for their views to the exporters/CHAs. Audit Officers should also scrutinize declarations with reference to data quality and advise the exporters/ CHAs suitably where the quality of their declarations is found deficient. Such advise is expected to be followed and will be monitored by the Local Risk Managers (LRM).


8. As in the case of Import, the national management of the Risk Management systems shall be the responsibility of the Risk Management Division. There will be a single Local Risk Manager (Admin) for a location for both import and export.


9. The implementation of RMS for exports will necessitate reorganization for staff. Board desires the Chief Commissioner of Customs to undertake a comprehensive re-organization of the officers deployed for processing of Shipping Bills. The present appraising facilities should be right-sized in tune with the quantum of Shipping Bills coming for assessment. A separate PCA section needs to be created and sufficient staff should be diverted to the Post Clearance Audit. The strength of the staff for examination of cargo would also be required to be readjusted.


10. With the introduction of RMS in exports, the selection of Shipping Bills for verification of Self-assessment and/or examination will be based on the output given by RMS to ICES. Accordingly the examination and assessment norms contained in the Board’s Circulars No. 06/2002–Cus dated 23.01.2002 , 01/2009-Cus dated 13.01.2009 and 28/2012-Customs dated 16.11.2012 would stand modified to that extent. However, owing to some technical reasons if the RMS fails to provide output to ICES or RMS output is not received at ICES end in time, the existing norms of assessment and examination prescribed by the aforementioned circulars will be applicable.


11. To begain with, RMS in Exports will be introduced w.e.f. 15.7.2013 at ICD Mulund and ICD Patparganj. With the implementation of RMS in exports the existing facilitation scheme viz. Accelerated Clearance System vide Circular No.30/2003-Cus dated 4.4.2003. would be phased out. As the deployment of the export RMS is likely to take place in a phased manner across the ICES locations, the existing facilitation scheme will continue to be operative in each Customs station until the operationalisation of the export RMS at the station.


12. Board desires DG (Systems) to forward the detailed instruction/draft public notice to field formation separately.


13. Any difficulty in implementation of these instructions should be brought notice of the Board immediately.


Yours faithfully,

( R.P. Singh )

Director (Customs)

F.No.450/28/2011-Cus.IV


RBI/2012-13/539 A. P. (DIR Series) Circular No.113 dated 24-06-2013

Reserve bank of India

A.P. (DIR Series) Circular No. 113


June 24, 2013


To

All Authorised Dealer Category –I Banks


Madam / Sir


External Commercial Borrowings (ECB) for the low cost affordable housing projects


Attention of Authorized Dealer Category - I (AD Category - I) banks is invited to A.P. (DIR Series) Circular No. 61 dated December 17, 2012 on the captioned subject in terms of which ECB for low cost affordable housing projects is allowed as a permissible end-use under the approval route.



  1. The policy regarding ECB for the low cost affordable housing projects has been reviewed and it has been decided to modify the guidelines contained in the aforesaid A.P. (DIR Series) Circular as under:

    1. Developers/builders should have a minimum of three (3) year’s experience in undertaking residential projects as against five (5) years prescribed earlier and should have good track record in terms of quality and delivery.

    2. The condition of minimum paid-up capital of not less than INR 50 crore, as per the latest audited balance sheet, for Housing Finance Companies (HFCs) stands withdrawn. However, the condition of the minimum Net Owned Funds (NOF) of Rs. 300 crore for the past three financial years remains unchanged.

    3. The aggregate limit for ECB under the low cost affordable housing scheme is extended for the financial years 2013-14 and 2014-15 with a ceiling of USD 1 billion in each of the two years, subject to review thereafter.

    4. The ECB availed of by developers and builders shall be swapped into Rupees for the entire maturity on fully hedged basis.



  2. Issue of fixation of spread for on-lending by National Housing bank (NHB):

    Interest rate spread to be charged by National Housing Bank (NHB) may be decided by NHB taking into account cost and other relevant factors. NHB shall ensure that interest rate spread for HFCs for on-lending to prospective owners’ of individual units under the low cost affordable housing scheme is reasonable.



  3. Housing Finance Companies (HFCs) while making the applications, shall

    1. it a certificate from NHB, the nodal agency, that the availment of ECB is for financing prospective owners of individual units for the low cost affordable housing;

    2. ensure that cost of such individual units does not exceed Rs. 30 lakh and loan amount does not exceed Rs. 25 lakh;

    3. ensure that the units financed are having maximum carpet area of 60 square metres; and

    4. ensure that the interest rate spread charged by the HFCs to the ultimate buyer is reasonable.




  4. All other aspects of the scheme mentioned in the aforesaid A.P. (DIR Series) Circular would remain unchanged. Authorised Dealers may bring the contents of this Circular to the notice of their constituents and customers.

  5. The directions contained in this circular have been issued under Section 10 (4) and Section 11 (1) of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (42 of 1999) and are without prejudice to permissions / approvals, if any, required under any other law.


Yours faithfully


(Rudra Narayan Kar)

Chief General Manager in-Charge

RBI/2012-13/539


Customs Notification No. 33/ 2013 dated 19-06-2013

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA

MINISTRY OF FINANCE

(DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE)


Notification No. 33/2013-Customs


New Delhi, dated the 19th June, 2013


G.S.R. (E). - In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 25 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962), the Central Government, being satisfied that it is necessary in the public interest so to do, hereby makes the following further amendments in the notification of the Government of India, in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), No. 96/2008 - Customs, dated the 13th August, 2008 , published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, vide number G.S.R. 590 (E), dated the 13th August, 2008, namely:-


In the said notification, in the Schedule, after serial number 30 and the entries relating thereto, the following serial number and entries shall be added, namely:-













Sl. No.Name of the Country
“31Republic of Haiti”.



[F. No. 354/189/2005-TRU (Vol II)]
(Akshay Joshi)

Under Secretary to the Government of India


Note:- The principal notification was published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, vide number G.S.R. 590 (E), dated the 13th August, 2008 and was last amended vide notification number 19/2013 - Customs, dated the 2nd April, 2013 , published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, vide number G.S.R. 198 (E), dated the 2nd April, 2013.


Online taxpayers may not need to send papers to CPC in Bangalore

Millions of taxpayers filing returns online may no longer have to send paper documents to the central processing unit here, with CBDT proposing to introduce electronic verification for such filings, a top official said.


"It (introduction of electronic verification of online income tax returns) is in very advanced stage. Some clearances, some approvals have to be taken. Amendments to the Information Technology Act will be required. Then it will go to Parliament," Chief Commissioner of Income Tax Bangalore-1 K Satyanarayana told reporters here.

The new measure, expected to be operational by September this financial year, will save taxpayers the hassle of sending paper documents by post and tracking its acknowledgement, he added.


Citing the example of how electronic verification of online income tax returns is done in USA, Satyanarayana said amendment to the Information Technology Act would be needed to introduce electronic verification of online income tax returns in India.


At present, two options are available for taxpayers to e-file ITR, either e-file ITR by affixing digital signature or without affixing digital signature.


If the digital signatures are affixed, there is no need to send ITR-V to the I-T department's central processing centre (CPC) in Bangalore. In the other case, the tax payer is required to take a print-out of ITR-V and send it to the I-T department within 120 days of e-filing.

As per the Information Technology Act, a digital signature is equivalent of a physical signature. So, anyone filing returns electronically with digital signature need not send ITR returns form for physical verification.

In 2012-13, a 31 per cent jump was seen in e-filings with 2.14 crore assessees filing returns online as compared to 1.64 crore in 2011-12.


Recently, the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has made e-filing mandatory for those with an annual income of Rs 5 lakh or more for the financial year and assessment year 2013-14. The tax department expects a huge surge in the number of online filings.


Satyanarayana said that the department also wants to introduce "new concept of third party validation of utilities developed for e-filing which will avoid mistakes in returns and bring uniformity in the interpretation of tax laws in filing of returns"





Tax refunds are not a mystery any more

IT Professional in Delhi had filed tax for the Assessment Year 2011-12 but he is still waiting for the tax refund for the return he filed. He has even cross checked whether he filed the returns in the appropriate manner.


This is not an isolated story; we all have our version of the story and a tale of anxiety and harassments with our hard earned money hanging midway. Taxpaying community, especially individuals are often a frustrated lot when it comes to refund of the taxes paid in advance.


Filing of tax has been a tedious task in itself and getting a refund done is even more cumbersome. The evolution of technology and its adaption in government departments and the increase of skill set, has decreased the problem of refund, however the problem still persists.


Why a tax refund arises?


The key reason why the situation of tax refund arises is due to high rate of interest on tax deductibles at source (TDS) compared to the actual tax payable. It has been seen that sometimes the income calculation of a person is higher when compared to advance tax liability, thereby generating the eligibility of reimbursement.

Further, eligibility comes into picture when the individual doesn't declare his full income to the employer. Medical insurance premiums, housing loans final certificates, interest on educational loans and LTAs are some common examples through which employee can claim tax refunds. Apart from that, Non Resident Indians are also eligible for tax refunds on the interest generated on the NRO account. The tax deducted is equivalent to 30.9 percent.


Eligibility Criterion:


If you are an individual whose income in the year is less than Rs. 2,00,000, then sit back and relax as you are not entitled to file income tax. The eligibility criteria is simple, you will have to calculate your tax liability according to the tax slabs of the Income Tax Act. If the taxes paid during the year were higher than the tax liability, you can get the refund. Please make sure that you have taken into account the deduction and exemptions based on the IT rules. It might also happen that you face a rejection of your refund application because of the wrong calculations of exemptions, therefore cross verify before filing the return.


Refund Status:


Income tax refunds can be checked online and the status can be known by visiting the site of income tax department and also State Bank of India dedicated mail id, which is itro@sbi.co.in. The website of IT department asks for your PAN number and the Assessment Year in which you filed the tax for the purpose of generating the refund status. State Bank of India has been assigned the duty of refunding the claims of tax payers on behalf of the IT department.


Refund Timings:


The difference between timing of offline returns and online returns are wide. The reach of online returns is not so much compared to that of offline returns in India. People are still more comfortable in going to their lawyers and Chartered Accountants for correct filing of the return and submitting the same by hand. The complications of tax calculations sometimes make this a compulsion. However, it must be noted that the refund timing vary. In case of online returns, refund process is faster and takes a maximum of six to seven months but this limit can go up to two years in case of offline returns. Sometimes, the delay is because of the change of addresses or incorrect bank account details.

Offline process is also disadvantageous in the sense that the government style of working sometimes doesn't solve the problem. You will have to visit your Assessing officer along with the documents of your income. But, it is still not guaranteed that your plea will be listened to and the next option for you in that case is to send the details to the chief commissioner of the particular area. In this case, you will have to submit the return copy. If the issue is not resolved for a long time, you can approach a tax ombudsman near you.


Refund timings have been a big issue for the Income Tax Department as many claimants have requested to ease the process and make it faster and user friendly. When you file the return on time with all the necessary documents and guidelines, you want a system that will ensure safety of your reimbursement. In all the cases, sometimes a wait of two years is too much to handle.


Income Tax refund is no longer a mystery that causes sweat beads to appear, all you have to be is bit proactive and be sure of the data entered by you. To have an instance valuation of your income tax, Investment Yogi has an Income Tax Calculator devised at your disposal.





If actual purchases couldn’t be proved, discrepancy in closing stock would be bogus and unexplained

IT : Where assessee had not produced any evidence to show actual purchases, shortage in stock could be added as bogus purchases


Matter remanded to AO as necessary material was produced by assessee before CIT(A) to justify its cl

IT : Where for claiming deduction under section 10B assessee did not produce necessary material before Assessing Officer, but produced same before Commissioner (Appeals), matter was to be remitted to Assessing Officer for passing a de novo order


Exp. incurred exclusively for business can’t be disallowed even if other persons too are benefited

IT : Merely because some other persons are incidentally benefited from expenses incurred by assessee, same would not change character of expenses from being wholly and exclusively for purpose of business


Eligibility for refund of ST paid on services used for exports to be determined from date of filing

ST : Refund under Notification No. 41/2007 in respect of service tax paid on services used for export of goods is allowable if requirements of Notification are satisfied on date of filing of refund claim, even if such requirements were not satisfied on date of export


De-facto boycott of a particular ITAT member by seeking adjournment is deemed ‘contempt of court’

IT : CAs & lawyers can't seek adjournments on the ground that objectivity of ITAT member is not beyond doubt even if petition in that behalf is pending before the jurisdictional High Court. CA/Advocate seeking adjournment for the reason that he doesn't want to appear before a particular Bench/member of ITAT commits 'contempt of court' by 'forum shopping' or 'de facto boycott' of a judicial officer. It is not open to CA/Advocate/bar association/group of ARs to seek adjournments on the ground that


Reassessment proceedings become null and void if section 143(2) notice wasn’t issued

IT : Absence of notice under section 143(2) makes reassessment null and void


INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCHES, MUMBAI STATEMENT SHOWING THE LIST OF THIRD MEMBER CASES PENDING AS ON 06.06.2013











INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCHES, MUMBAI
STATEMENT SHOWING THE LIST OF THIRD MEMBER CASES PENDING AS ON 06.06.2013


Sr Appeal No. Name of the Bench Points involved To whom REMARKS
No Assesses assigned

MUMBAI BENCH
1. ITA Nos. 525 to Mrs. Sumanlata S/Shri. 1. "Whether, non-issuance of Zonal Vice- Fixed on
530/Mum/2008, Bansal, Mumbai 1. R.S.Padvekar, the notice as provided in Sub.- President(MZ) 31.07.2013
A.Ys.1999-2000 to J.M. sec.(2) to Section 143 of the I.T.
2004-05 2.B.Ramakotaiah, Act in the case of assessment
A.M. framed u/sec.153A, in
consequence of search under
sec. 132, is merely an
irregularity and the same is
curable?"
2. "Whether ,on the facts of the
case, failure on the part of the
Assessessing Officer (A.O.) to
issue notice to the assessee as
per provisions of Sub-sec.(2) to
Section 143 shall have the
effect of rendering the entire
assessment framed u/sec. 153A
of the Act as null and void?"

2. ITA 5229/M/2004 M/s. Standard S/Shri. "Whether on the facts and Shri. R.S. Syal, After the
& 5303/M/2004 Chartered Bank 1.R.S.Padvekar, circumstances of the case A.M.p Disposal of MA
A.Y. 1996-97 J.M. interest income of
2.Rajendra Rs.73,92,16,611/-
Singh, A.M. (Rs.39,23,71,781+Rs.34,68,44,
830) is asseable to tax in the
year under consideration?"
1
PUNE BENCHES
1. ITA No. M/s Audyogik S/Shri. 1. "In the facts and Zonal Vice- Fixed on
1712/PN/2007, Shikshan Mandal, 1. Mukul Shrawat, circumstances of the case, President(MZ) 19/07/2013
for A.Y. 2004-05. Pune, J.M. whether the property of the trust
2.D. Karunakara i.e. car, be held `made
Rao, A.M. available' for the use of the
trustee, specified person u/s
13(3) of the Income Tax Act
1961?"
2. "In the facts and
circumstances of the case,
whether the expression `made
available for the use of' trustee
ipso facto be understood to have
been deemed used or applied
for the benefit of the said
trustee, with or without the
actual use or application of the
property of the trust i.e. car for
personal benefit of the trustee in
view of section 13(2) of the
Income Tax Act 1961?"
3. "In the facts and
circumstances of the case,
whether the case of the assessee
falls within the ambit of the
provisions of clause (b) of
section 13(2) of the Income tax
Act 1961?"
4. "If the answers to above
questions at sr. No. (1) to (3)
are affirmative, whether the
denial of benefits of section 11
be restricted to such income of
the trust used or applied directly
or indirectly for the benefits of trustee
or, in alternative, the total income of
the trust is not entitled for the benefits
of section 11 of the Act."
2
DELHI
BENCHES
1. IT(SS)A No. Mr. Vijay Bansal, S/Shri 1. "Whether the addition on Hon'ble Vice-
438/Del/2005 & Haryana. 1. Hari Om account of undisclosed President (BZ)
IT(SS)A.22/Del/06 Maratha,JM. investment on the investment
2.T.S.Kapoor, on the education of daughter of
AM. the assessee, in the block
period, found to have been
made has been correctly
sustained or it deserves to be
deleted in the given facts and
the circumstances of the case?

2. Whether an addition made
and sustained on account of
undisclosed investment found in
the construction of the property
deserves to be deleted or
sustained in the given facts and
circumstances of the case?

3. Whether any addition can
be made in the business income
of the assessee on the basis of
evidence gathered behind the
back of the assessee by opening
a floppy found and seized
during the search conducted u/s
132(1) of the Act or not?

4. Whether the cash found
during search from a brief-case
stands explained, in the given
facts and circumstances of the
case or not?






3
LUCKNOW
BENCHES
1. ITA No. Ms Rajya Krishi S/Shri 1."Whether" the CIT(A) has Shri.Barathvja Adjourned Sine
141,142,143 & Utpadan mandi 1. I.S.Verma,J.M. jurisdiction to decide the Sankar,Vice die
144/LKW/2009 Parishad, 2. N.K.Saini, A.M. assessee's petition for stay or President (as per
C.O.No.06 to Lucknow recovery of demand during the dt.03.04.2013) of
09/LKW/2009 pendency of assessee's appeal the Hon'ble
A.Y.2001-02,2002- furnished under section 246A of President)
03,2003- the Act?"
04 &2006-07 2. "If the CIT(A) has jurisdiction
to decide the assessee's petition for
stay of recovery of demend , than
under which provisions of law the
CIT(A) will pass such an order i.e.
what will be the nature or status of
such order passed by the CIT(A)?"
3. "Whether, such order (supra)
passed by the CIT(A) is
appealable before the Tribunal
or not i.e. can such an order be
appealed against before the
Tribunal by way of an appeal
under section 253 of the Act, or
can be challenged only before the
Hon'ble High Court by way of
writ petition?"
4. "If such an order(Supra) is
found to be appealable before the
Tribunal, then can the Tribunal
entertain such an appeal against
such order without there being
appeal before it against the order
of CIT(A) in appeal against the
order of the Assessing Officer or
other orders appealable under
section 246A of the Act, as the
case may be, for the reason that the
CIT(A) has not preferred to
decide the assessee's appeal
pending before him?"

4
2. ITA No. M/s Zazsons S/Shri. "Whether, on the facts and the Shri. S. V. Adjourned Sine
219/LKW/2009 and Exports Ltd. 1. I.S.Verma, J.M. circumstances of the case as Mehrotra, A.M. die
C.O.No.23/Lck/ Kanpur 2.N.K.Saini, A.M. well as in law, the Revenue's (As per order
2009 A.Y.2005-06 ground Nos.3 to 6 be allowed or dt.21.03.2013 of
not?" the Hon'ble
President)
3. SPNo.03/Lkw/2012 Smt.Uma Pandey, S/Shri. SP No.03/Lkw/2012 Shri.G.D.Agarwal, Hearing is
(A/o ITA Sunil Kumar Hon'ble Vice- awaited.
188/Lkw/2010) Yadav,J.M. "Whether, the stay earlier President (DZ and
A.Y. 2007-08 2.B.R.Jain,A.M. granted by the Tribunal can be LZ)
SP.No.04/Lkw/201 M/s.State Urban extended till disposal of the
2 Development appeal in a case where the
(A/o ITA Agency. appeal has been heard by the
103/Lkw/2012) Tribunal and is pending with
A.Y. 2007-08 the Members for order?"
Sd/-
J.M.
"Whether, on the peculiar facts,
circumstances of this case and
in law, there is any justification
in extending the stay of the
disputed demand that already
had run beyond 365 days or the
application so made by the
assessee is liable to be
rejected?"
Sd/-
A.M.
SP No.04/Lkw/2012
"Whether, under the facts and
circumstances of the case, the
outstanding demand can be
stayed outrightly or subject to
payment of part of demand in
instalments as proposed?"
Sd/- Sd/-
J.M. A.M


5
4. ITA No. Smt. Uma Pandey S/Shri. "Whether, under the facts and Shri.G.D.Agarwal, Hearing is
188/Lkw/2010 1.Sunil Kumar circumstances of the case, the Hon'ble Vice- awaited.
A.Y. 2007-08 Yadav,J.M. payments received by the President (DZ/LZ)
2.B.R.Jain,A.M. assessee from M/s. Amit Poly
Yarn Ltd. (now known as M/s
Amitech Ind. Ltd) are receipt as
an advance against sales made
during the course of
commercial transactions and
therefore provisions of section
2(22)(e) of the Income-tax Act,
1961 are not attracted to these
payments or the aforesaid
payments are purely an
advance/loan made to the
assessee, attracting the
provisions of section 2(22)(e) of
the Act?
"Whether, the issue of
allotment of shares for Rs.10
lakhs can be restored to the
Assessing Officer to investigate
the fact as to whether the
allotment of shares was
unilateral act of the company i.e
M/s. Amitech Ind. Ltd. or the
allotment was done at the instance
of the assessee in order determine
the applicability of provisions of
section 2(22)(e) of the Act to the
benefit accrued to the assessee on
allotment of shares or addition of
Rs.10 lakhs can be confirmed by
holding that benefit accrued to the
assessee on allotment of shares
attracts provisions of section
2(22)(e) of the Act on the basis of
material available on record?"
Sd/- Sd/-
J.M. A.M
6
JABALPUR
BENCH
1. ITA No. Shri. Anil S/Shri "Whether on the facts and the Hon'ble ----
327/Jab/2009 Jaiswal, Jabalpur 1.I.S.Verma, J.M. circumstances of the case as President,
A25/10-2004 2.B.R.Kaushik, well as in law, the CIT(A) was I.T.A.T.
A.M. justified in deleting the addition
made, while making assessment
under section 153A read with
section 143(3) of the Act on
protective basis?"


KOLKATA
BENCH
1. ITA Nos. M/s Shyam Steel S/Shri "Whether in the facts and Hon'ble Vice- Not yet fixed
65/Kol/2010, & Industries Ltd., 1.George Mathan, circumstances of the case the President
655/Kol/2011. Kolkata. J.M. power subsidy received by the Chennai/Kolkata
A.Y.2006-07 2007- 2.C.D.Rao,A.M. assessee is capital in nature or Zone.
08 revenue in nature ?"
2. ITA No. M/s Ceean S/Shri "Whether or not, on the facts Hon'ble Vice- Not yet fixed
1120/Kol/2012. Commerce (P) 1.Promod Kumar, and in the circumstances of the President
A.Y.2003-04. Ltd., Kolkata. A.M. case and in accordance with the Chennai/Kolkata
2.Mahavir Singh, low, the value of sale Zone.
J.M. consideration to be adopted for
computing capital gains in the
hands of the assessee should be
taken at Rs.32,84,300/- or at Rs.
56,00,100/-? As the amendment
in section 50C by Finance
(N0.2) Act, 2009, w.e.f.
1.10.2009, is to be treated as
clarificatory in nature and
retrospective in application".




7
3. ITA NO. Sri Partha Mitra, S/Shri. 1."Whether in view of the Hon'ble Vice- Not yet fixed
848/Kol/2012 Kolkata. 1.Pramod Kumar, provision of section 254(2A) of President
AM. the Act as also the proviso Chennai/Kolkata
2.George Mathan, thereto and the decision of the Zone.
JM. Hon'ble Supreme Court in the
case of Chinnayappa Mudaliar
can the decision of the
Coordinate Bench of this
Tribunal in the case of
Multiplan India Pvt. Ltd. as also
the decision of the Hon';ble
Madhya Pradesh High Court in
the case of Estate of Late
Tukojirao Holkar - Vs.- CWT
be held to be applicable on the
facts of the case"
2."Whether in terms of the
provisions of Rule 19(2) of the
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
Rules read with Rule 24 & 25
(Appellate Tribunal) Rules,
1963, an appeal can be
dismissed in limine without
addressing the merits of the
appeal just because the
appellant does not appear"?
3."Whether the decision in the
case of Multiplan India Pvt.
Ltd. 38 ITD 320 (Del.) will
hold good in law as on i.e. even
after insertion of Rule 24 & 25
of Appellate Tribunal Rules,
1963.?
4."Whether it is open to the
Tribunal to dismiss an appeal,
without addressing itself to the
merits of issues in appeal, because
one of the parties has not appeared
before the Tribunal"?

8
PATNA BENCH
(Circuit Bench,
Ranchi)
1 MA No. Shri. Ghasi Ram S/Shri. "Whether, on the facts and in Hon'ble Zonal Pending for
11 (Pat) / 2007 Agarwal, Ranchi 1. B. R. Mittal, the circumstances of the case, Vice President hearing.
arising out in J.M. the application of the (KZ)
IT(SS)A No. 2. B.K. Haldar, department for recall of the
45/Pat/05) A.Y. 86- A.M. order of the Tribunal dt. 21st
87 to 97-98 June, 2006 passed in IT(ss)A
No. 91(Pat)/05 to delete the
amount of Rs.45,823/- is to be
allowed as held by the learned
Accountant Member or is to be
rejected as held by the learned
Judicial Member."



2 Int. Tax Appeal M/s Coalsesce S/Shri. "Whether, in the facts and Hon'ble Zonal Pending for
Nos. 06 to Investment (P) 1. B. R. Mittal, circumstances of the case, the Vice-President hearing.
08/Pat/06 Ltd., Ranchi J.M. assessee was liable under the
A.Ys.1997-98 to 2. B.K. Haldar, Interest Tax Act to pay interest tax
1999-2000 A.M. on the gross interest received on
the loans and advances granted by it
during the impugned assessment
years."
GUWAHATI
BENCHES
1 ITA 47, 48 and M/s Purbanchal S/Shri. 1. "Whether, on the facts and Hon'ble Not yet fixed.
49(Gau)/2004 Safety Glassess 1.Hemant circumstances of the case the President,
A.Y.1996-97, 1997- (P) Ltd., Sausarkar, J.M. Ld. CIT(A) was justified in I.T.A.T.
98 & Guwahati. 2.B.R.Kaushik, deleting the additions made by
1998-99 A.M. the A.O. under section 69 of the
Act as undisclosed investment
amounting to Rs. 9,21,461/-,
Rs.2,20,990 and Rs.3,66,526/-
for the assessment years 1996-
97, 1997-98 and 1998-99
respectively on the ground that
the reassessments made by the
9
A.O. for the assessment years in
question were based on the
information received from
Bureau of Investigation
(Economic Offence)
(Guwahati) and that the
information was based on
material and documentary
evidence to substantiate the
assessments?"
2. "Whether on the facts and
in the circumstances of the case
the order of the Ld.CIT(A) is
required to be set aside with the
direction to decide the issue
afresh after giving proper
opportunity to the assessee on the
relevant information received by
the A.O. on 25.02.2003 from the
Bureau of Investigation (Economic
Offence)?"
3. "Whether, on the facts and in
the circumstances of the case, the
Ld. Judicial Member was
justified in holding that the
issuance of notice u/s 148 cannot
hold good and, therefore, the
assessment u/s 143(3) r.w.s.
147 of the Act is illegal,
unjustified and void or the Ld.
Accountant Member was
justified in holding that the
reopening of assessment and
subsequent assessment made by
the A.O. is justified?"
As per the order dt.16.04.2008
of the Hon'ble President
"All the three questions would
be considered u/s 255(4) by the
President."

10
2. ITA Nos. 96, 97 & Brooke Bond S/Shri. 1. "Whether, the learned Shri.Pramod Adjourned Sine
98(Gau)/2002 India Ltd., 1.Hemant CIT(A) has erred in law and in Kumar,A.M. -die
A.Y.1990-91, 1991- Calcutta. Sausarkar, J.M. facts in directing the A.O. to
92, 1992-93 2.B.R.Kaushik, consider the income from
A.M. interest and dividend as
business income for the purpose
of eligible deduction u/s 32AB
of the Act, in view of the
decision in the case of CIT Vs.
Dinjoy Tea Estate (P) Ltd.
(1997) 224 ITR 263 (Gau), 271
ITR 123 (Cal), 273 ITR 470
(Mad) and 224 ITR 263
(Gau)?"
2. "Whether, this Bench of the
Tribunal working under the
jurisdiction of the Hon'ble
Guwahati High Court can allow
the claim of the assessee that
income from interest and
dividend is to be taken as
business income for the purpose
of eligible deduction u/s 32 AB
of the Act in view of the
decisions in the cases of (i)
Britania Industries Ltd. Vs.
JCIT (2004) 271 ITR 123 (Cal)
and (ii) DCIT Vs.United
Nilgiris Tea Estate Co.
Ltd.(2005) 273 ITR 470
(Mad)?"
3. "Whether, on the facts and
circumstances of the case the
claim of expenditure of
Rs.94,363/- and Rs.1,26,718/-
attributable to the foreign tour
of Mrs. R. Sen, wife of the
director, Mr. D. Sen, was not
wholly and exclusively for the
11
purpose of business?"
4. "Whether, in view of change
of stand by the assessee
regarding nature and purpose of
expenditure taken before the
Ld.CIT(A) for the first time the
issue was required to be
restored to the A.O. for fresh
adjudication after enquiring into
the claim of the assessee?"

3. ITA No. Shri. Shyam S/Shri. (1) "Whether, on the basis of Hon'ble Not yet fixed.
09/Gau/2006 Sunder Malpani, Hemant Sausarkar, facts and in the circumstances President,
A.Y.2002-2003 Jorhat J.M. of the case, the assessee is I.T.A.T.
B.R.Kaushik, entitled to deduction u/s 80IB?"
A.M. (2) "Whether, in view of the
decision in the case of CIT Vs
Down Town Hospital Ltd. 251
ITR 683 (Gau), the issue was
required to be restored to the
learned CIT(A) for fresh
adjudication after ascertaining
whether all the conditions u/s
80 IB are fulfilled?"
4. ITA 161/Gau/2003 M/s 3R, S/Shri 1. "Whether in the facts and Shri. Not yet fixed
Block period f Gauwahati. 1. Hement circumstances of these cases the D.K.Tyagi,J.M.
1989-90 to 1998-99 Sausarkar, J.M. block assessments can be
& 1999-2000. 2. B.R.Kaushik, considered invalid?"
A.M. 2. "Whether, in the facts and
circumstances of these cases it can
ITA 162/Gau/2004 M/s Panbazar
be held that the A.O. did not bring
Block period 1989- Diagnostic on record the prima facie evidence for
90 to 1998-99 & Centre, Guwahati. invoking jurisdiction and initiation of
1999-2000 proceedings u/s 158 BD of the Act?" ------ do -------




12
BANGALORE
BENCH
1. MP.No Shri Mahesh S/Shri/Smt. 1."Whether, on the facts and in Hon'ble Vice- Fixed on
41/Bang/2010 Hasmukh Boriya, 1.P.Madhavi Devi, the circumstances of the case, President (BZ) 28/06/2013
(ITA 773/B/10) J.M. there is any mistake apparent
2. A.Mohan from record rectifiable u/s
Alankamony, 254(2) of the IT Act, when the
A.M. Tribunal adjudicated the
Revenue's appeal on the sole
ground of limitation in favor of
the Revenue, but not remitted
back the issue to CIT(A) for
adjudication on merits when
such an issue of
remission/merits was not before
the Tribunal either by a prayer
submission or cross objection
by the Assessee/AR other than
the only argument to defend his
ground on technicality?"
2."Whether, the inclusion of a
copy of a favourable judgment
to the assessee on the issue of
merits in the paper book
produced before the ITAT
would amount to be a ground or
submission enabling the
assessee to invoke the
rectification jurisdiction of the
Tribunal, when during the
course of the hearing there were
no such arguments or
submission on merits/remission
before the Tribunal by the
Assessee/AR?"




13
CHANDIGARH
BENCH
1. ITA No. Shri . R.K.Garg S/Shri . Per J.M. Hon'ble Vice Adjourned
142/CHD/1999 1.M.A.Bakshi, VP 1. "Whether, on the facts and in President sine-die
A.Y.97-98 2. N.K.Saini. A.M. the circumstances of this case, (Chandigarh)
ITA 550, 489, 586, the guarantee commission
587 & 588/CHD/99 received by the assessees is a
A.Y.87-88, 90-91, revenue receipt or a capital
98-99, 1999-2000 & receipt?"
2000-2001 2. "Whether, the decision of the
Tribunal in assessee's own case
for the assessment year 88-89 to
the effect that the guarantee
commission is a revenue receipt
ITA No. Smt. Sunaina is inapplicable in view the
143/CHD/1999 Garg decision of the Hon'ble Madras
A.Y.97-98 High Court in the case of CIT v.
ITA Nos. 589, 590 Pondicherry Industrial
& 591/CHD/2002 Promotion Development &
A.Y. 1998-99, Investment Corporation Ltd.
1999-2000, (supra), and the decision of
2000-2001 Delhi High Court in the case of
Suessen Textile Bearings Ltd.
ITA 503/CHD/2002 Shri . R.K.Garg, etc. v. Union of India etc.
A.Y. 1997-98 & Sons(HUF) (supra)?"
3. "Whether, on the facts and in
the circumstances of the case,
the additional ground raised by
the revenue for the assessment
year 90-91 only deserves to be
admitted and matter for all the
assessment years remitted to the
CIT(A) for giving an
opportunity to the AO to
distinguish the two High Courts cases,
referred to above notwithstanding the
fact that both the Members of the
Bench have decided the issue relating
to assessability of the guarantee
commission on merits?"
14
Per A.M.
1. "Whether, on the facts and in
the circumstances of the case, it
could be held that the guarantee
commission received by the
assessees against their personal
assets was a capital receipt?"
2. "Whether, on the facts and in
the circumstances of the case
and also in law, the Ld. CIT(A)
should have provided and
opportunity of being heard to
the Assessing Officer when
there was a specific direction by
the Tribunal to do so, before
arriving at a conclusion on the
basis of judgment of Hon'ble
Delhi High Court in the case of
Suessen Textile bearing Ltd.
and others V Union of India,
CC2 JJX 0082 and Hon'ble
Madras High Court in the case
of CIT V. Pondicherry Indl
Promotion Development and
Investment Corp. Ltd. (2000)
245 ITR 859, that the amount
received by assessees
was a capital receipt.
AMRITSAR
BENCH
1. IT(SS)A No. Sh.Vinod Goel S/Shri Shri H.S.Sidhu. Zonal Vice Pending for
14/ASR/2005. 1. H.S. Sidhu, 1. "Whether, on the facts President(CZ) fixation
J.M. and in the circumstances of
IT(SS)A M/s Sidhant 2.Mehar present case, the issues in the
No.13/ASR/2005. Deposits & Singh,A.M. present appeals are covered by
Advances(P) Ltd. the decision of the Hon'ble
IT(SS)A M/s Trimurti Supreme Court in the case of
No.12/ASR/2005 Deposits & Manish Maheshwary Vs. ACIT
Advances (P) Ltd. (2007) 289 ITR 341 (SC) and
15
the decision of the Hon'ble
jurisdictional High Court in
Income tax Appeal No.519 of
2009 decided on 20-7-2010 in
the case of CIT-I, Ludhiana Vs.
Mridula Prop. Dhruv fabics,
Ludhiana?"
2. "Whether, on the facts
and in the circumstances of the
present case, non-production of
records by the revenue in spite
of various opportunities given
to them, benefit should go to the
revenue or the asessee?"
3. "Whether, on the facts
and in the circumstances of the
present case, it is mandatory a
pre-requisite that the
satisfaction to be recorded in
the cases of persons searched
before issuance of notice under
section 158 BD of the Income
tax Act. 1961 to the assesse i.e.
other person?"
Shri. Mehar Singh,AM.
1. "Whether on the
facts and on law, valid Block
Assessments can be cancelled,
on the ground of assumed non-
production of record indicating
recording of satisfaction u/s
158BD, in a case where such
satisfaction is duly evidenced by
documents available in the paper
book filed by the Deptt. and
reproduced verbatim in the order
dated 06.12.2006 passed by the
Bench and subsequent M.A.dated
21.01.2009, dismissed by the
16
Bench, without even considering
such satisfaction?'
2. " Whether, on the facts
and on law Block Assessments
can be cancelled by applying
the decision of jurisdictional
High Court, relied upon by the
assessee, which lays down the
law that satisfaction under
section 158BD be recorded
before the conclusion of the
Block Assessments under
section 158BC of the Act, in the
absence of vital details of dates
of completion of such block
assessment being determinative
factor, in determining the
applicability of the said
decision, where the parties to
the disputes failed to furnish
such dates?"
JAIPUR BENCH
1. ITA No. M/s. Mahaveer S/Shri Shri R.K. Gupta, JM. Hon'ble Vice Pending
937/Jp/2011 Exports, Jaipur. 1.R.K.Gupta, JM. 1. "Whether, in the facts and President
2.Sanjay circumstance, the addition of (Ahmedabad
Arora,A.M. Rs.3,58,455/- made by one of Zone)
the partners S mt.Kanta
Nowlkha is liable to be deleted
or to be confirmed?"
2. "Whether, in the facts and
circumstances, the addition of
Rs. 1,00,000/- each in the name
of Shri Nem Chand Nowalkha
and Shri Pankaj Ghiya of the
assessee firm made as capital
contribution is liable to be
deleted or liable to be set aside
to the file of the Assessing
Officer?"
17
3. "Whether, in view of the
decision of Hon'ble
Jurisdictional High Court in
case of Kewal Krishan &
Partners, 18 DTR 121 (Raj.) the
entire capital contribution
made/contributed prior to
commencencement of business
in liable to be deleted or to be
confirmed in part and partly to
be set aside to the file of
Assessing Officer ?"

Shri Sanjay Arora,AM.
1. "Whether, section 68 of the
Income-tax Act, 1961 can be
invoked where the assessee fails
to satisfactorily explain the
nature and source of a case
credit found recorded by him in
his books of account for the
relevant year, or is the Revenue
also required to establish that
the assessee had in existence a
source of income before the
date on which such cash credit
was recorded, i.e., in order to
treat the same as unexplained
u/s. 68?"

2. "Whether, the addition of the
impugned sums as unexplained
credits u/s.68 can be deleted on
the sole ground that the assessee
had no source of income prior
to the date on which the same
were found recorded in the
assessee's books of account,
notwithstanding the fact that it
18

has completely failed to
discharge the burden of
satisfactorily explaining the
nature and source thereof?"
3. "Whether, the view that a
cash credit recorded in the
books of account of a
partnership firm ostensibly as
capital contributed by a partner
cannot be treated as
unexplained u/s.68 in the hands
of the firm even if the
assesseefirm fails to
satisfactorily explain the nature
and source thereof, and more
particularly if its fails to adduce
evidence to establish that the
alleged capital was actually
contributed by the partner, is
sustainable in law in view of the
decision by the Hon'ble
jurisdictional high court in CIT
v. Kishorilal Santoshilal
(1995)216 ITR 9 (Raj.)?"
4.1 "Whether, can capital be
contributed by a partner to a
partnership-firm prior to the
coming into existence of the
said firm? In any case, whether
the claim of capital contribution
by way of transfer of goods on
June 1,2006 can be accepted in
view of the fact that the
assessee-firm itself came into
existence only on July
11,2006?"
"Is the remand in the case of
two cash credits of Rs. 1 lac
each in the name of two
19
partners justified under the facts
and circumstances of the case,
even as contemplated by the
Hon,ble jurisdictional high
court in the case of Rajshree
Synthetics (P) Ltd. v. CIT
(2002) 256 ITR 331 (Raj.)?"
2. ITA No.363 & M/s Escorts Heart S/Shri Shri R.K.Gupta,J.M. Hon'ble Vice Adjourned
326/Jp/2011 Institute & 1. R.K.Gupta, 1. Whether in the facts and President (Delhi sine-die.
A.Y.2008-09. Research JM. circumstances of the case, the Zone)
Centre,Jaipur. 2. SanjayArora, provisions of section 194J are
ITA Escort Heart AM. applicable on the payments
No.1123/Jp/2011 Super Speciality made to blood bank ?"
A.Y.2009-10. Hospital 2. Whether in the facts and
Ltd.,Jaipur. circumstances of the case, the
provisions of section 192 or
section 194J are applicable in
case of retainer doctors ?
3. Whether in the facts and
circumstances of the case, on
the mark up/profits earned by
Fortis Health World Ltd.
(FHWL) on sale of medicines to
the assessee is a commission
chargeable to tax under section
194H or is a sale on which
provisions of section194H are
not applicable?
4. Whether in the facts and
circumstances of the case, on
the mark up/profits the
provisions of section 194C can
be invoked by the Tribunal
where neither this is a case of
department nor of the assessee ?
Shri Sanjay Arora, AM.
1.1 Whether the payments to
the blood banks for carrying out
investigation procedures, are, in
20
the facts and circumstances of
the case, made by the assessee-
hospital or by its patients?
1.2 Whether, while deciding an
issue under appeal, the tribunal
required to apply its
independent mind thereon,
without being influenced by the
decision by the first appellate
authority for a subsequent year,
particularly when the same was
not pressed during hearing and,
accordingly, the parties not
heard thereon?
2. I am in agreement with the
Question No. 2 as proposed by
my ld. Brother, JM.
3.1 Whether, can on the
admitted set of facts brought on
record by the parties, the
inferential finding/s by the
Appellate Tribunal differ from
that of either party before it, or
is it to necessarily match
therewith? Further, is not the
tribunal duty bound to, in
deciding an issue before it,
apply the law as applicable to
the facts found by it, including
such inferential finding/s?
3.2 Whether, in the facts and
circumstances of the case, the
supply of medicines by Fortis
Health World Ltd.(FHWL) to the
assessee-company for its IPD
Pharmacy, constitutes an
independent business being
carried on by FHWL, or is the
said supply only the result of

21
the work carried out by its
relevant manpower, whose
services stand already
contracted to the assessee
company and subject to tax
deduction u/s. 194C of the Act?
JODHPUR
BENCH
1. ITA No.362(JU)/10 Smt. Supriya S/Shri "Whether, on the facts and Hon'ble Vice- Adjourned
Kanwar, Jodhpur. 1. JoginderSingh, circumstances of the case, solitary President sine-die
J.M. transaction of purchase and sale of (Mumbai Zone)
2. K.G.Bansal, the same agricultural land with
A.M. standing crops situated beyond the
prescribed municipal limits,
amounts to adventure in the nature
of trade?"
Sd/-
(Joginder Singh,JM)
"Whether, on the facts and in
the circumstances of the case
and sale of five pieces of
agricultural land with standing
crop, by way of separate
conveyance deeds, beyond the
prescribed distance from any
municipal council, amount to
transactions on capital account
or adventure in the nature of
trade?"
Sd/-
(K.G.Bansal)
A.M




22
RAJKOT BENCH
1. MA. Nos. 61 to Shambhubhai S/Shri "Whether on the facts and Hon'ble Vice
66/Rjt/2010(A.O. of Mahadev Ahir, 1.T.K.Sharma, JM. circumstances of the case, all the President, Adjourned
ITA Nos. 637 to Gandhidham. 2.D.K.Srivastava, six Miscellaneous Appelications (Ahmedabad sine-die.
639 & 707 to AM. filed by the Revenue should be Zone)
709/Rjt/2010) dismissed or be allowed?"

2. ITA NO. M/s Meridian S/Shri "Whether on the facts and Hon'ble Vice Fixed on
01/Rjt/2012 Impex,Jamnager. 1.T.K.Sharma, JM. circumstances of the case, the ld. President, 19/06/2013
2. D.K. Srivastava CIT(A) is correct in confirming the (Ahmedabad
AM. penalty of Rs. 7,28,621/- levied by Zone)
the AO u/s 271(1)(c) of the
Income Tax Act, 1961 OR it
should be cancelled as proposed by
Judicial Member?"
Sd/-
(T.K.Sharma,JM.)

1."Whether a well-reasoned order
passed by the CIT(A) can be
reversed or otherwise interfered
with by this Tribunal without
recording reasons for disagreeing
with it.
2. "Whether the case of the
assessee, on the facts stated in the
Dissenting Note of the AM, is
covered by Explanation 1 to
section 271(1) (C)."

Sd/-
(D.K.Srivastava,AM.)




23
INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCHES, MUMBAI

LIST OF THIRD MEMBER CASES HEARD AND PENDING FOR ORDERS AS ON 06.06.2013.

Sr. Appeal No. Name of the Bench Points involved To Whom Remarks
No Assessee assigned
MUMBAI BENCHES
1. ITA No. M/s Kaira Can S/Shri. Reference dt. 25.11.2008 u/s 255(4) of the Shri I.P. Bansal, Heard on
6987/Mum/2003 Company Ltd. 1. Sunil Kumar Yadav, Income Tax Act made afresh by S/Shri. JM. 13/06/2013
ITA No. 5280 & J.M. Sunil Kumar Yadav, J.M. and V.K.
5281/Mum/2004 2. V.K.Gupta, A.M. Gupta, A.M. is as under.
A.Y. 1996-97 to 1998- 1. "Whether the impugned transactions of
99 leasing out of assets to the assessee is a lease
transaction or a financial lease?
2. "Whether the assessee can be held to be
the owner of the asset acquired under the
above transactions and is entitled for
depreciation over the said assets or assessee
being a lessee is entitled to claim the lease
rent paid to the lessor as a revenue
expenditure?"
GUWAHATI BENCH
1. ITA No. 25/Gau/2005 M/s Baid S/Shri. "Whether, on the facts and in the Shri.Pramod Heard on
A.Y.1996-97 Commercial 1.Hemant Sausarkar, circumstances of the case the transport Kumar,A.M. 04.04.2012
Enterprises Ltd., J.M. subsidy is to be treated as capital in nature in
Guwahati. 2.B.R.Kaushik, A.M. view of decisions in the following cases-
i) CIT Vs Assam Asbestos Ltd. 215 ITR 847 Heard on
2. ITA No. 20/Gau/2005 M/s Shiva Sakti (Gau) 04.04.2012
A.Y.2001-2002 Floor Mills (P) ii) Sahney Steel & Press Works Ltd. And
Ltd., Tinsukia Others Vs CIT 228 ITR 253 (SC)
C.O.No.02/Gau/2005 iii) DCIT Vs Assam Asbestos Ltd. (2003)
263 ITR 357 (Gau)
M/s Virgo iv) CIT Vs Rajaram Maize Products Ltd. 251 Heard on
3. ITA No.165/Gau/2004 Cements Ltd., ITR 427(SC) and 03.04.2012

24
A.Y.2001-2002 Gauwahati. v) Sdarda Plywood Industries Ltd. Vs.CIT 238
ITR 354(Cal).
JAIPUR BENCH
1. ITA No. 110/JP/2012 Smt. Asha S/Shri Whether in the facts and circumstances of the Shri Heard on
Mandowra,Jaipur. 1.R.K.Gupra, present case, the order of Ld. CIT(A) is liable G.D.Agarwal, 14.05.2013
JM. to be confirmed or liable to be restored to his Vice-
2.Sanjay Arora, file to pass a fresh order ? President(DZ)
AM.

2. MA. No. 11/JP/2011 Shri Deepak S/Shri Whether in the facts and circumstances of the Shri Heard on
(A.O.of ITA No. Delela,Jaipur. 1.R.K.Gupta, present case, the order of Tribunal in Misc. G.D.Agarwal, 14.05.2013
13/JP/10) JM. Application No.11/JP/2011 arising out of the Vice-
2.Sanjay Arora, order of the Tribunal in ITA No.13/JP/2010 President(DZ)
AM. relating to Assessment Year 2006-07 is liable
to be allowed by recalling the order of the
Tribunal or to be dismissed.?




25