Monday, 22 July 2013

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCHES, MUMBAI STATEMENT SHOWING THE LIST OF SPECIAL BENCH CASES PENDING AS ON 06.07.2013.











INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCHES, MUMBAI

STATEMENT SHOWING THE LIST OF SPECIAL BENCH CASES PENDING AS ON 06.07.2013.

Sr. Appeal No. Name of the To whom assigned the Points involved Remark
No Assessee Special Bench
MUMBAI BENCHES

1. ITA No. 5568 & DHL Operations 1. Hon'ble Vice- "Whether, or not, on the facts and in Fixed on
5569/M/1995 & B.V. Netherlands President the circumstances of the case and on a 10.09.13
6448/M/1994 2. ( MZ) proper interpretation of Art. 5.5 and
A.Y. 1991-92 to 1993- 3. Shri. P.M.Jagtap, Art. 5.6 of the DTA (with Netherlands)
94 A.M. and having regard to its activities, it
Shri.B.Ramakotaiah, can be said that Airfreight Ltd. was the
A.M. agent of the assessee so that it can be
held that the assessee had a PE in
India? And if the answer is in the
affirmative, whether or not the income
from inbound shipments can be treated
as attributable to the PE?"




2. ITA 5996/M/93 GTC Industries Ltd. 1. Vice President(MZ) Fixed on
ITA 1055/M/94 2. Shri R.S.Syal,AM. 05.09.13
ITA 1056/M/94 3. Shri B. Ramakotaiah,
A.M.




1
DELHI BENCHES

1. ITA No. M/s C.L.C. & Sons 1. Hon'ble President, "Whether, on the facts and Fixed after
1976/Del/2006 Pvt. Ltd. I.T.A.T. circumstances of the case, assessee is the disposal
2. Hon'ble Vice-entitled to claim depreciation on the of Hon'ble
President (Zonal) value of all intangible assets falling in High Court
3. Shri. Rajpal Yadav, the category of "any other business or in the case of
JM. commercial rights", without coherence CLC Global
of such rights with the distinct genusis/ Ltd. which is
category if intangible assets like know pending
how, patents, copyrights, trade marks, before
licences and franchises as defined U/s Hon'ble High
32(1) (II) of the I.T. Act." Court.
2. ITA No. 1999 & M/s National 1. Shri.G.D.Agarwal,VP "Whether on the facts and Blocked for 6th
2000/Del/2008 Agricultural Co-op. (DZ). circumstances of the case, where claim Months
Mkt. Federation of 2. Shri.Rajpal Yadav, of damages and interest thereon is
India, New Delhi 3. J.M. deputed by the assessee in the court of
Shri.I.C.Sudhir,JM law, deduction can be allowed for the
interest claimed on such damages while
computing business income."
3. ITA M/s Giesecke & 1. Shri P.M.Jagtap,A.M. 1."Whether for the purposes of Fixed on
No.5924/Del/2012 Devirent India 2. Shri A.D. Jain, J.M. determining the Arm's Length Price in 05/08/2013
Pvt.Ltd.,Gurgaon. 3. Shri B. Ramakotaiah, relation to the international
A.M. transaction, quantitative filter of
high/low turnover is to be applied and,
accordingly, high/low turnover
companies vis-à-vis the assessee
company are to be excluded from the
comparables selected for bench
marking the transaction.
2.If the answer to question no. one is in
affirmative then what should be the
parameter, if any, for exclusion of
high/low turnover companies vis-à-vis
the assessee company.

2
4. ITA M/s Suraj 1. Shri U.B.S Bedi, J.M. "Whether on the facts and in the Fixed on
No.3827/Del/2009 Oversease(Pvt.)Ltd. 2. Shri S.V.Meharotra, circumstances of the case, the 22/07/2013
A.Y.2006-07 A.M. Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)
3. Shri I.C. Sudhir, J.M.erred in Law in holding that profit
aggregating to Rs. 2,51,50,313/-earned
by the appellant from sale of shares and
securities held under discretionary
portfolio management scheme was
assessable under the head `business
income', as opposed to capital gains
returned by the appellant?"
5. ITA No. Shri Tejinder singh 1. Vice President, (DZ) "Whether on the facts and Blocked for 06
163/ASR/2003 (HUF) 2. Shri S.V.Mehrotra, circumstances of the case, months
A.Y.1998-99 A.M. consideration claimed to have been
3. Shri R.P. Tolani,J.M. received on account of sale of jewellery
4. Shri B.C.Meena, A.M. etc. relating to the disclosures made
5. Shri R.P.Yadav, J.M. under VDI Scheme, 1997, can be
considered to be the income of the
assessee from undisclosed sources
under any of the provisions of Income-
tax Act, 1961?"
KOLKATTA
BENCHES
1. ITA Nos.1548 & M/s. 1. Hon'ble President, 1. "Whether, on the facts and in the Adjourned
1549/Kol/2009 Instrumentarium I.T.A.T. circumstances of the case, no arm's length Sine-die.
A.Y.2003-04 & 2004- Corporation Ltd. 2. Hon'ble V.P. (KZ) rate of interest was required to be charged
05 3. Shri Mahavir Singh, on the loan granted by the non-resident
J.M. assessee-company to its wholly owned
subsidiary Indian company M/s Datex
Ohmeda(Indian) Pvt. Ltd.(Datex)?"
2. "Whether, in the given facts and
circumstances of the case, CBDT
Circular No. 14 of 2001 [252 ITR (St.)
104] and Taxation Ruling TR 2007/1
issued by Australian Taxation Office are
relevant in the context of Transfer
3
Pricing Regulations of India, in
particular to the case of the assessee?
3. "Whether, setting off of loss with
future profits and not assessing the
interest income in the hands of the
assessee on arm's length price will
cause real loss to the Govt. exchequer?"



CHENNAI BENCHES

1. Int. T.A. 101 & M/s Bharat 1. Hon'ble Vice- "Whether, the amount collected from Adjourned
161/Mds/2003 Overseas Bank Ltd., President (CZ) the borrowers to meet the interest tax Sine die
A.Y. 1999-2000 Chennai 2. Shri. N.S.Saini,A.M. liability could be taxed as interest
A.Y.2000-2001 3. Smt.P.Madhavidevi, under the Interest-Tax Act, 1974?"
J.M.
AHMEDABAD
BENCHES
1. ITA 2170/Ahd/2005 M/s Nanubhai D. 1. Hon'ble President,"Whether, Shri Deepak R. Shah, Adjourned
Desai, Surat I.T.A.T. advocate and ex-Accountant Member of Sine die
2. Hon'ble Vice-the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, is
President (AZ) debarred from practicing before the
3. Shri.R.S.Syal,A.M. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in view
of the insertion of Rule 13 E in the
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
Members (Recruitment and Conditions
of Service) Rules,1963?"
2. ITA 1952/AHD/2012 Shri Himanshu V. 1. Hon'ble Vice- "Whether deduction u/s 80-IA(4)(ii), Date awaited
Shah, Ahmedabad. President,(AZ). which is available to BASIC Telecom
2. Shri.S.V.Mehrotra, Services Providers is also available to
A.M. Franchisee of such Basic Service
3. Shri.M.K.Shrawat, Providers also, which is only putting
J.M. EPEX system with out creating
infrastructure in the field of Telecom?"

4
3. ITA Nos.2668,2669 & The People"s Co-op. 1. Hon'ble Vice- 1."Whether the assessee being a Co- Fixed on
2670/Ahd/2012 & Credit Society Ltd., President(AZ). operative Credit Society, in view of its 12/08/2013
C.O.Nos.10, 11, Deesa. 2. Shri.M.K.Shrawat, function in providing credit facilities to
12/Ahd/2012 J.M. its members, is into the business of
3. Shri A.M. banking and is it not being impeded or
Alankamony, A.M. hit by the provisions of section 80P(4) of
I.T. Act, 1961? Further, in view of
section 5 of Banking Regulation Act,
1949 and section 2 of NABARD Act,
1981, whether this Co-operative Credit
Society is carrying on the Banking
Business, and for all practical purposed
acting like a Co-operative Bank?"

2. "Whether a Co-operative Credit
Society being providing credit facility to
its members can be held as banking
function, so as to deny the benefit of
Section 80P(2)(a)(i) by invoking the
provisions of section 80P(4)?"
HYDERABAD
BENCHES
1. ITA No. 18/H/2012 M/s Jagathi 1. Shri R.S. Syal, AM. Fixed on
Publication Pvt. 2. Shri P.M. Jagtap, AM. 16/09/2013
Ltd., Hyderabad. 3. Shri N.V. Vasudevan, Vide M.Z.U.O.
JM. Dt.03.07.2013




5
INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,MUMBAI BENCHES,MUMBAI.

LIST OF SPECIAL BENCH CASES HEARD AND PENDING FOR ORDERS AS ON 06.07.2013


Sr. Appeal No. Name of the To whom assigned the Points involved Remark
No Assessee Special Bench
RAJKOT BENCH
1. ITA No. 391 & M/s Bharti Auto 1. Shri G.C. Gupta, Heard on
392/Rjt/2011. Products, Jamnager. Vice-President, (AZ). 18/06/2013
2. Shri D. K.
Srivastava, AM
3. Shri A. M.
Alankamony, AM.




6

RBI/2013-14/147 A.P. (DIR Series) Circular No. 14 dated 22-07-2013

Reserve Bank Of India

A.P. (DIR Series) Circular No.14


July 22, 2013


To


All Category - I Authorised Dealer Banks


Madam / Sir,


Export of Goods and Software – Realisation and Repatriation of export proceeds – Liberalisation


Attention of Authorised Dealer Category-I (AD Category-I) banks is invited to A.P. (DIR Series) Circular No. 52 dated November 20, 2012 extending the enhanced period for realization and repatriation to India, of the amount representing the full value of goods or software exported, from six months to twelve months from the date of export up to March 31, 2013. Further, in terms of A.P. (DIR Series) Circular No. 105 dated May 20, 2013 it was decided, in consultation with the Government of India to bring down the above stated realization period from twelve months to nine months from the date of export valid till September 30, 2013.



  1. In this connection, it is clarified that as the realization and repatriation period stipulation in terms of A.P. (DIR Series) Circular No. 52 dated November 20, 2012 was valid till March 31, 2013 only, the time period for realization and repatriation of export proceeds from April 01, 2013 onwards till September 30, 2013, shall be reckoned as nine months from the date of export.

  2. The provisions in regard to period of realization and repatriation to India of the full export value of goods or software exported by a unit situated in a Special Economic Zone (SEZ) as well as exports made to warehouses established outside India remain unchanged.s

  3. AD Category-I banks may bring the contents of this circular to the notice of their constituents and customers concerned.

  4. The directions contained in this circular have been issued under sections 10 (4) and 11(1) of the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA), 1999 (42 of 1999) and are without prejudice to permissions / approvals, if any, required under any other law.


Yours faithfully,


(C. D. Srinivasan)

Chief General Manager

RBI/2013-14/147


RBI/2013-14/148 A.P. (DIR Series) Circular No. 15 dated 22-07-2013

Reserve Bank Of India

A.P. (DIR Series) Circular No. 15


July 22, 2013


To


All Scheduled Commercial Banks which are Authorised Dealers (ADs) in

Foreign Exchange/ All Agencies nominated for import of gold


Madam / Sir,


Import of Gold by Nominated Banks /Agencies/Entities


Attention of Authorised Persons is drawn to the Reserve Bank’s A.P. (DIR Series) Circulars No. 103 , 107 and 122 dated May 13, June 04 and June 27, 2013 respectively on the captioned subject. ;As per these instructions, certain restrictions were imposed on the import of various forms of gold by nominated banks/nominated agencies/ premier or star trading houses/SEZ units/EoUs which have been permitted to import gold for use in the domestic sector. None of these restrictions was applicable to import of gold for the purpose of exports or to import of gold by units in SEZ exclusively for the purposes of exports.



  1. Based on a review of the above instructions and in consultation with Government of India, it has been decided to rationalize the import of gold in any form/purity including import of gold coins/dore into the country. Accordingly, the following instructions are issued:

    1. It shall be incumbent on all nominated banks/nominated agencies to ensure that at least one fifth of every lot of import of gold (in any form/purity including import of gold coins/dore) is exclusively made available for the purpose of export. Such imports shall be linked to financing of exporters by the nominated agencies (i.e. average of last three years or any one year whichever is higher). Further, they shall make available gold in any form for domestic use only to entities engaged in jewellery business/bullion dealers supplying gold to jewellers.

    2. They will be required to retain 20 per cent of the imported quantity in the customs bonded warehouses.

    3. They are permitted to undertake fresh imports of gold only after the exports have taken place to the extent of at least 75 per cent of gold remaining in the customs bonded warehouse.

    4. Any import of gold under any type of scheme, shall follow the 20/80 principle set out at (a) and (b) above. The extant instructions, as regards import of gold on consignment basis, LC restrictions etc. stand withdrawn.

    5. A working example of the operation the scheme envisaged in terms the present instructions is given in the Annex.




  2. Entities/units in the SEZ and EoUs, Premier and Star trading houses are permitted to import gold exclusively for the purpose of exports only.

  3. AD Category I Banks are advised to strictly ensure that foreign exchange transactions effected by / for their constituents are compliant with the above instructions. Head Offices of nominated agencies / International Banking Divisions of banks would be responsible for monitoring operations of the revised scheme taking into account transactions put through different centres.

  4. Government of India will be issuing separate instructions, if any, to the customs authorities/DGFT to operationalize and monitor these import restrictions.

  5. The above instructions will come into force with immediate effect. Authorised dealers may please bring the contents of this circular to the notice of their constituents and customers concerned.

  6. The directions contained in this circular have been issued under Section 10(4) and Section 11(1) of the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA), 1999 (42 of 1999), and are without prejudice to permissions / approvals, if any, required under any other law.


Yours faithfully


Rudra Narayan Kar

Chief General Manager-in-Charge

RBI/2013-14/148




Annex


An example of the working of the scheme:



  1. Nominated agency ABC imports say 100 kg of gold in any form/purity.

  2. Out of the above import of 100 kg, 20 kg gold held in the bonded warehouse can be got released in part or full to be sold to exporters of gold against undertaking to customs authorities as is the practice now.

  3. Any further import of gold by ABC shall be permitted by the customs authorities only to the extent of actual export out of 20 kg of gold held in bonded warehouse. This can happen only after at least 15 kg of gold out of 20 kg is actually exported from the previous lot.

  4. If ABC wants to place order for the second lot of import, only 75 kg of import (including 15 kg for exports) will be permitted which will again follow the procedure outlined above. At this stage, total gold with the bonded warehouse meant for the exporter will be (5 + 15) i.e. 20 kg. Out of this at least 15 kg (i.e. 75% of the above 20 kgs) will have to be actually exported to enable ABC to import again. This procedure will be followed for every lot of import.

  5. If for any reason, ABC is not able to channelize the gold held in bonded warehouse for exports, no further imports can be undertaken by ABC who will also arrange for re export of the gold in the bonded warehouse.


Materials used for making a premises dust-free and fire resistant is an eligible inputs

ST : Paints and other materials used on floor of factory/premises to make it dust free and fire retardant, which was essential for manufacture/provision of service, are inputs eligible for Cenvat Credit


Payments for launching and tracking of satellite aren't FTS as no technology is made available to as

IT/ILT : Where foreign companies did not make available or transfer any technology to assessee satellite manufacturer, with respect to launching and tracking of its satellite, payments could not be held as fees for technical services in view of article 13 of India - France DTAA and article 12 of India - USA DTAA


CISF wants ‘service tax, security deposit’ for guarding Haryana, Punjab Secretariat

The Central Industrial Security Force (CISF), which has been guarding the Punjab and Haryana Civil Secretariat in Chandigarh for over a decade now, has threatened to withdraw its services, if both the governments failed to clear outstanding dues worth Rs 45 crore by August 31.


The amount included service tax and advance security deposit of three months on the security being provided by it to the states.


The CISF, earlier this month, had sent a strong-worded notice to the governments of Haryana and Punjab in this regard. According to CISF, while Haryana is required to clear an outstanding of Rs 23 crore, Punjab owes it Rs 22 crore. However, in a letter to the director general (CISF) under Union Ministry of Home Affairs, Haryana's Additional Chief Secretary (Home) Samir Mathur has rebutted its claims and clarified the government's position.

It stated that CISF is a central armed police force and clearly differentiated from private security agencies.


"In this case, it is providing safety and protection to the functioning of democratically elected governments under the Constitution. The Punjab and Haryana Secretariat is the seat of governance of the states of Punjab and Haryana from where the constitutional functions are discharged. It is difficult to conceive that service tax has been sought to be levied for security... when the states are paying deployment charges," the letter added.


On CISF's claim that Haryana owes it arrears worth Rs 6.47 crore and a penal interest of Rs 9.82 crore, the government said: "During reorganisation of the erstwhile Punjab state, the assets were divided in the ratio of 60:40, including the space and manpower deployed in the Secretariat building between Punjab and Haryana. ...during the period of deployment of ITBP, the cost was shared in the ratio of 60:40 and this pattern is continuing again from October 2009 till date."





Interest allowable on advance deposit of MAT under sec. 115JA, as it bears character of advance tax

IT : MAT deposit made in advance under section 115JA on basis of book profit bears character of tax paid in advance and, therefore, interest under section 244A has to be granted in case of excess deposit of said amount


Why you should file tax returns before July 31 deadline

Q: July 31 is the last date for filing it returns. But a lot of people use the two year extended window to file their returns. Is this advisable? And what are the implications of missing the July 31 deadline?


A: One should file income tax return before the deadline rather than waiting for the deadline; file it as soon as possible.


If one files the income tax return late, that is after the deadline of July 31 then a penal interest is required to be paid. The penal interest is equal to 1 percent of the tax due whether one day or one month, 1 percent per month or part of the month, the penal interest would be payable. Therefore, I strongly recommend all taxpayers of India to file income tax return in time.


Those who have got loss etc, they cannot take the benefit of carry forward of the loss, especially if the tax return is filed beyond July 31.


If no tax is due and return is delayed then one can file the return after July 31. No penalty, no penal interest but only in a situation when no tax is due.

Q: Suppose there is any kind of unpaid tax pending because of variety of reasons like if one is changing employer or have any kind of other source of income etc then is there any penalty if one does not file returns within July 31?


A: Yes, if one does not file return before July 31 then some taxes are due. Reasons are not concerned, whether change of employer or some other income, tax on other income, interest income and property income. The fact remains that as on July 31 some tax is outstanding. On that tax the net tax payable amount penal interest will be the required to be calculated and to be paid. That means even if return is delayed for two days, for example if one files in the month of August even then penal interest will be charged for the whole month. Therefore, file the return in time, pay the taxes now and file the return before July 31.


Caller Q: I am holding unlisted company shares for last 20 years for which there is a buyback offer by an American multinational company. Can I pay long-term capital gain tax without indexation at the rate of 10 percent?


A: You will not be able to take advantage of 10 percent tax rate as that is applicable only for listed company. You have to calculate the cost based on cost, inflation index and then make payment of 20 percent tax and you can save tax also by making investment in real estate.

Caller Q: What is the right time to declare interest on the bank fixed deposits (FDs)?


A: On accrued basis declare your income from bank FDs etc. This means you would have a cumulative fixed deposit receipt and bank will give the details, certificate and details of accrued interest. Therefore, best is to declare accrued interest in the income tax return but still the choice lies with the taxpayer to take whichever path he would like to chose. One can go for cash system of accounting or mercantile system of accounting but follow one system consistently, for example you may declare accrued interest on year-to-year basis or you may declare the entire interest income at one go in the year in which you receive the actual amount of the interest. However, it's better to go in for declaring on accrued bases so it is easy for you to take advantage of the tax deducted at source also.





Staff crunch may burn Rs 15,000-cr hole in direct tax mop-up

Direct tax collection may fall short by Rs 15,000 crore due to manpower shortage, the Income-Tax Gazetted Officers Association apprehends.


Suggesting filling up nearly 1,350 additional posts of Group A officers by promoting Group B Income Tax Officers, A. Sitarama Rao, President of the Association, said, “With just 50 per cent of the sanctioned strength of these commissioners, how on earth will the Government narrow its gap between revenue and expenditure to 4.8 per cent in 2013-14 and three per cent by 2016-17?”


At a press conference here on Thursday, the Association said the problems were two-fold. First, the effective strength of the additional posts at certain levels will be much less than projected. Second, the direct recruitment process will take time.


Income Tax Gazetted Officers are basically promotees and account for nearly 15 per cent of total workforce in the department. After spending years as officers, they are promoted to the post of Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax and Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax.

The Association claims that these two ranks alone collect 80-85 per cent of total direct taxes.


According to its back-of-the-envelop calculation, the targeted working strength at the level of Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax and Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax will be reduced to 1,528 against the sanctioned strength of 2,914.


The Association’s statement comes after the Government has approved creating over 20,000 additional posts (Group A – 1,349, Group B – 2,064 and Group C – 17,338) in the Income Tax Department as part of cadre restructuring.


It was said that the move would generate additional revenue of over Rs 25,750 crore a year against additional expenditure of nearly Rs 450 crore annually.


However, the Association feels that even this additional revenue will not be possible, apart from shortfall in the Budget target of Rs 6.68 lakh crore.


The Income Tax Department plans to appoint 270 Group A officers a year for five years. Half of these will be through direct recruitment and half through promotion.

According to the Association, considering that the Union Public Service Commission (agency responsible for recruitment of Group A officers at Central Government level) cannot commence its recruitment process before February 2014, only 270 vacancies are likely to be filled by way of promotions. The corresponding 270 direct recruitment vacancies in 2013-14 and 2014-15 will actually be available only after two years.


Direct tax includes income, corporate, securities transaction and wealth tax. During April-June, gross direct tax collection rose to Rs 1.24 lakh crore against Rs 1.11 lakh crore during same period last fiscal.





Simplifying procedure for filing income-tax returns










The deadline for filing income tax returns, July 31, is just week away. Needless to say, many individuals dread the date with I-T department, as they find the entire process very confusing. However, according to experts, if an individual is clear about the basics, the entire procedure can be completed in an hour's time. "Tax payers earning over Rs5 lakh are now required to file their tax return electronically. This will reduce paperwork to a great extent," says Vineet Agarwal, director at KPMG.


Choose the right form


Tax consultants are divided over the applicability of forms ITR-1 (Sahaj) and ITR-2 for salaried individuals, drawing income from salary and interest. Going strictly by the new I-T rules, an individual cannot file returns using the simpler form ITR-1 (Sahaj) if the person has any taxexempt income above Rs5,000. Since the I-T department has not issued any clarification so far, there are numerous interpretations on the matter.

"Due to the change in rules, most salaried individuals will now have to use ITR-2. After all, typically, their remuneration includes tax-exempt components like house rent allowance (HRA), transport /conveyance allowance and leave travel allowance (LTA), which can easily exceedRs5,000 in a year," explains Vaibhav Sankla, director with tax consultancy firm H&R Block. However, many experts argue that ITR-1 (Sahaj) is the relevant form for this year. "Our view is that if the exempt income has been accounted for in Form 16, salaried individuals can continue to use ITR-1 (Sahaj). However, if they have earned an income of over Rs5,000 from, say, dividends, they will have to use ITR-2. Similarly, resident Indians, who may have been deputed abroad by their employers and are claiming a double tax avoidance treaty benefit, will have to use ITR-2," says Sonu Iyer, partner and national leader — human capital services, EY (formerly E&Y).Until last year, such additional, explicit disclosures were not sought by the I-T department.


Check your tax credit


Take a look at Form 26AS, which shows the amount of tax deducted from your salary that your employer has actually deposited with the I-T department, on the e-filing portal. "It is critical to ascertain whether the tax deducted from your income (as per your Form 16) matches the figures in Form 26AS. The two versions must tally. If you go ahead with filing the return without seeking clarity on the nature of the discrepancy, you are bound to get a notice from the I-T department later," says Iyer.

Simplifying procedure for filing income-tax returns Claim 80G, other deductions

You also need to figure out whether you want to claim any extra deductions you forgot to claim earlier. For example, if you have not submitted the relevant bills while making your investment declaration in January, your Form 16 might not have accounted for the deduction of up to Rs5,000 on preventive health checkups under section 80D. You have the option of claiming this deduction while filing returns. "ITR forms do not require you to enter any details of such bills. However, it is advisable to retain copies of these bills. If there is an enquiry from the tax department in future, these bills will serve as proof," says Sankla of H&R Block. Similarly, you can also claim deductions under section 80G on donations made to charitable institutions. "Typically, employers do not consider 80G deductions in Form 16. So, the individual can claim the benefit at the time of filing return. In the ITR form, you will be required to provide details like the amount donated as well as the charity's name, PAN and address," he adds.



Business Group Wants Separate Ports For Exports, Imports

A business lobby group is demanding that the government designate separate seaports for exports and imports to overcome gridlock in the country’s biggest trade gateway, Tanjung Priok Port in North Jakarta.



Indonesian Employers Association (Apindo) chairman Sofjan Wanandi said on Monday that the lengthy dwelling time at the port resulted in high business costs that burdened business players and moreover, markedly disrupted international trade activities.




“We certainly cannot do business as usual, and certainly require a drastic change. Otherwise, both exports and imports will be impacted,” he told reporters after a meeting with Industry Minister MS Hidayat.



Exports and imports in Southeast Asia’s top economy have grown to record highs in recent years, with last year seeing exports reaching US$190.03 billion and imports settling at $191.69 billion.



In line with significant surges in overseas trade activities, the dwelling time at Tanjung Priok Port which shoulders more than 70 percent of incoming and outgoing goods, has further expanded in the past few years, peaking to eight days this year from 6.5 days last year.



Indonesia’s dwelling time ranked highest compared to its Southeast Asian neighbors, including Singapore (1.2 days) and Thailand (five days).



In the past few weeks, poor performance in Tanjung Priok Port has raised deep concerns among business players as it could process only 170 containers on a daily basis, far fewer than the 600 containers that it should tackle, according to an estimate by the Indonesian Chamber of Commerce and Industry (Kadin).



The slow handling activities at the port caused Rp 4.8 billion ($472,209) per day in losses for exporters and importers, Kadin’s recent statistics reveal.



A quick solution to accelerate exports would be to build a new seaport to mainly serve exports in Kawasan Berikat Nusantara (KBN) industrial bonded zone in North Jakarta, Sofjan said.



KBN, which covers Marunda, Cakung and Tanjung Priok, currently serves as an export-processing zone (EPZ) that hosts more than 100 factories.



On the other hand, to cope with big inflows of overseas goods, particularly raw materials and intermediary goods, the government should allow a special verification process, with importers and importer producers getting their purchased items checked at their own warehouses instead at the densely occupied Tanjung Priok Port, Sofjan added.



In response to the demand from local business players, the Industry Minister said breakthroughs were needed at the heavily congested port as the problems could further hurt both exporters and importers if they remained unsolved.



“We must [first] realize the plan to build a new container port in KBN. At least that can be a temporary alternative due to inefficiency at Tanjung Priok. If such inefficiency continues, our industry will suffer bigger losses and undermine the competitive edge of local businesses,” Hidayat said.



“The verification at warehouses of each importing firm would be feasible as an emergency solution to temporarily ease overloads at the port, but should be followed by stricter customs procedures,” he added.


Source:-www.thejakartapost.com





No unfair trade practice if complainant couldn’t prove that it was lured by false advertisement to a

MRTP : Where complainant could not prove that it acted on false and misleading advertisement issued by respondent-carrier before handing over its consignment to said carrier, no case of unfair trade practice was made against respondent


Curb Import Of Mobiles And Electronics To Support Rupee

Jul 22, 2013


MUMBAI: Experts have recommended curbs on imports of imports and pro-growth policies to encourage inflows from foreign institutional investors. Reserve Bank of India's moves to raise rates has been criticized as it hurts growth and encourages foreign debt which is seen as hot money.



"There is a need for RBI to cut rates aggressively to bring back the 'feel better' factor as a 'feel good' factor is something that will take longer. There is a need for this to encourage inflows from foreign institutional investors which is the only source through which capital can come in fast and in large quantities" said Pradip P Shah, Chairman, IndAsia Fund Advisors. He was speaking at a seminar on the falling rupee and its impact on the Indian economy.



He also said that foreign currency non-resident deposits ( FCNR) which has helped India raise foreign currency in the past can be encouraged through sops such as lower cash reserve ratio and statutory liquidity ratio requirement for these deposits. He said that central government must do its bit by discouraging imports of consumer electronics, micro electronics and consumer products if required through non-tariff barriers. "Right now these imports are not doing anything for the Indian economy they are only creating jobs in Thailand or some other country" he said.



Echohing his view Saugata Bhattacharya economist Axis Bank said that the government's top priority should be in reviving growth. "Growth coming down from 9% to 7% is not as bad as growth coming down from 6% to 5%" he said. According to Bhattacharya besides placing curbs on imports the government could provide a simultaneous sop to domestic production through tax cuts.



According to Prabodh Thakker, Vice President, IMC and chairman of Aon Global Insurance Brokers to support the rupee there was a need to provide a boost to domestic manufacturing, improve the policy environment and spur growth.


Source:-timesofindia.indiatimes.com





Fresh Curbs On Gold Imports

Mumbai, July 22: The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) today tightened gold imports further by ordering nominated banks and agencies to ensure the export of one-fifth of every lot of gold imported.



The central bank said banks must retain 20 per cent of the imported gold in customs bonded warehouses and will only be able to further import gold after exporting at least 75 per cent of the gold from those warehouses.




The RBI added that the banks and agencies could make available gold in any form for domestic use only to entities engaged in the jewellery business.



The latest measure came as part of what it called a move to “rationalise” the import of gold into the country.



Both the Union government and the central bank have been concentrating on bringing down gold imports over the past few months to tackle the ballooning current account deficit (CAD).



India’s CAD, which simply put is the difference between inflows and outflows of foreign currency, rose to 4.8 per cent of the gross domestic product in 2012-13 from 4.2 per cent in 2011-12. A high CAD has also been blamed for the recent depreciation in the value of the rupee.



As part of these efforts, while import duty of gold was raised to 8 per cent from 6 per cent, the RBI had in the recent past placed various restrictions on banks’ import of gold.



These steps seem to have met with success as imports in June are estimated to have fallen to around 31 tonnes from 162 tonnes in May and 141 tonnes in April.



India imported around 830 tonnes of the yellow metal in the previous fiscal.



In its notification today, the central bank said all nominated banks/nominated agencies must ensure that at least one fifth of every lot of imported gold is exclusively made available for the purpose of export.



Analysts said the quantitative restriction was a clever move by the RBI as it had to be seen in the context of the tight export market now prevailing.



This had resulted in gems and jewellery exports from India declining in 2012-13.



With imports of gold now linked to exports, the amount of the yellow metal coming into India could be hit if exports do not pick up.



The instructions will, however, not apply to import of gold by units in the special economic zones, export-oriented units or star trading houses, which import gold only for the purpose of exports, it added.



The RBI said on a review of earlier norms, it “has been decided to rationalise the import of gold in any form/purity, including import of gold coins” and the new guidelines will come into force with immediate effect.



The government will issue separate instructions, if any, to the customs authorities and the DGFT to operationalise and monitor these import restrictions, the RBI said.



The banks and other authorised agencies have been asked to strictly ensure that foreign exchange transactions are compliant with new instructions, the RBI said, adding that they will be responsible for monitoring operations.



It further said earlier instructions on the import of gold on a consignment basis and against letters of credit had been withdrawn.



Gems and Jewellery Export Promotion Council chairman Vipul Shah said, “This step will boost exports and foreign revenue. There will not be any shortage of gold for domestic use. There will be some impact on prices.”


Source:-www.telegraphindia.com





Adjustments made by TPO to be deleted as it provided no reasoning or data to justify exclusion of co

IT/ILT : Where TPO only provided unsupported reasoning and no data for excluding comparables adopted by assessee, adjustment was not sustainable


Income from short-term investment of sum acquired through convertible zero coupon debenture is taxab

IT: Where a company had introduced in assessee-company a sum of Rs. 900 crores in form of zero coupon convertible debenture to be converted into equity shares within a span of 36 months and out of which a sum of Rs. 500 crores was invested by assessee in short-term deposits with banks, interest earned on these deposits was an income chargeable under head 'income from other sources'


Sum paid under VRS on closure of a few of units as a part of restructuring process is an allowable r

IT: Where only two units of assessee-company were closed as part of restructuring process, expenditure on voluntary retirement scheme was allowable as revenue expenditure


Income from letting out of a commercial complex is ‘Income from house property’ and not a business i

IT : Income earned by assessee-firm from letting out a commercial complex was to be assessed as income from house property and not as business income


Adjudicating authority can’t go beyond the scope of show cause notice

ST : Demand cannot be confirmed on a ground not specified in show-cause notice


Interest earned by supplier of goods on deferred payment is exempt from ST

ST/ECJ : Supplier of goods/services who authorizes his customer to defer payment of price, in return for payment of interest, is, in principle, making a grant of loan and accordingly, interest earned thereon falls under negative list


HC denied to admit writ against a revision order as assessee had an alternate remedy to appeal befor

IT: Against revision order, assessee should approach Appellate Tribunal instead of filing writ petition before High Court


Sunday, 21 July 2013

Ownership of land with developer of a housing project isn’t a condition precedent for sec. 80-IB ded

IT : Ownership of land for development of a housing project is not a criterion for section 80-IB deduction


Payment of consultancy fees to carry on business more efficiently and profitably is a revenue exp.

IT : Expenditure incurred on consultancy charges to carry on business more efficiently, is to be treated as revenue expenditure, and not as capital expenditure


Ownership of property transferred during pendency of proceedings before BIFR or during winding up to

CL: Where transfer of properties were made either during pendency of reference before BIFR or during pendency of winding up proceedings, Official Liquidator was to be directed to take steps for restoration


‘Due date’ under sec. 36(1)(va) for payment of employee’s contribution to PF is same as contemplated

IT: Employee's contribution towards Provident Fund if paid before due date of filing return is allowable under section 36(1)(va) to employer assessee


Functionally different comparables to be excluded from list of comparables for TP study

IT/ILT : Where in course of transfer pricing proceedings, TPO made certain adjustment to ALP determined by assessee, in view of fact that two comparables selected by TPO were functionally different, assessee's plea that said comparables were to be excluded while determining ALP, was to be accepted


Finance Ministry Initiates Steps To Correct Trade Data Discrepancies

21 Jul, 2013


NEW DELHI: The Finance Ministry has asked Customs Department to ensure use of standard units on same items entering or leaving the country across ports in order to prevent discrepancies in trade data, which lead to embarrassment.





The Central Board of Excise and Customs (CBEC) has found that Standard Unit Quantity Codes (UQC), indicated in the Customs Act, are not being uniformly declared by importers and exporters for the same items across different ports.



"The issue of poor quality of trade data has been engaging the attention of the government," CBEC said in a communication to the Customs and other revenue officials.



An error of USD 9 billion was noticed in the country's exports for April-November period of 2011-12.



"The solution lies in improving the quality of data by using standard UQCs...Accordingly, it is directed by the Board that Customs field formations should ensure that only the correct and prescribed Standard UQC ... is mentioned in Bills of Entry/ Shipping Bills," the CBEC said.



It said an analysis of National Import Data Base (NIDB) reveals that there are at times "variations between the lowest and highest unit values of the same item", which might escape detection on account of the use of different unit codes.



Use non-uniform UQCs impacts data quality and makes comparisons and aggregations difficult, the CBEC said.



"The use of non-uniform UQCs for the same item also vitiates the quality of the NIDB data and reduces its utility to the assessing officers, who are unable to ascertain the contemporaneous values or assessment practice of a given item in different Customs locations," it said.



UQC have been specified in the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. The Board, which is responsible for collection of indirect taxes, asked the Chief Commissioners of Customs to ensure the instructions are "complied with scrupulously".



It, however, said the exercise should not result in delays in clearance of cargo.



Earlier, the Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) had streamlined flow of trade figures from different ports in the country.



This was done following the error in export figures of April-November period of 2011-12. The Prime Minister's Office had asked the commerce department to explain the errors.



Data reporting problems also created problems for officials during a recent visit of Commerce and Industry Minister Anand Sharma to Mauritius where bilateral trade figures were found not matching.




Source:-economictimes.indiatimes.com





Quarterly Apparel Sales Grow 10% On Stable Cotton Price, Removal Of Excise Duty

KOLKATA: Readymade apparel sales have bounced back after two years of flat growth with brands, retailers, manufacturers reporting more than 10% growth in last quarter. A stable cotton pricing coupled with removal of 10% excise duty has worked in favour of apparel industry bringing consumers back to the market at a time when inflationary pressure and rising product prices are pinching their pockets.



The rising domestic demand has prompted the country's textile industry to increase production of apparel and also look at Bangladesh to build up sufficient inventory for the festive season which is expected to drive sales further in the second half of the current fiscal.



"The domestic apparel industry is once again back in the growth mode after a lull of two years. In the first quarter there has been an overall growth of around 10% even though the economic parameters are not very bright. The growth has come because consumers are not willing to hold back their purchases any further," said Rahul Mehta, president of the Clothing Manufacturers Association of India.



Apparel makers and retail chains like Turtle, Madura Fashion, Future Group and Spencer's Retail say steady apparel prices this year has induced consumers to undertake purchases and the wedding season too has helped the industry. Apparel brand Turtle director Amit Ladsaria says the brand has grown by 31% in the first quarter (April-June) of this fiscal as compared to the same period last year. "The best part of this growth in sales is that it happened on full price, without any discounts or consumer offers," says Ladsaria.



Allen Solly brand head Sooraj Bhat adds that more serious shoppers are in the market. "The growth is coming from higher conversions and triggered by regular customers who account for almost 40% of the sales. Footfalls are yet to pick up completely," he says, adding the brand has grown sales of like-to-like stores by 26% in the last quarter over same period last year.



Prices have played a key role in bringing back customers to the market. Though the production cost has gone up but the apparel makers have not passed it to the customers bringing them much relief.



Spencer's Retail president & CEO Mohit Kampani says on an average apparel prices is slightly less expensive compared to last year on per unit basis. "The steady prices has made apparel more affordable when other consumer product prices have gone up.This has been a big catalyst," he says. Spencer's Retail has grown by 15% in apparel on a like-to-like basis over last year. Future Group's fashion business too is growing upwards of 20% at the Big Bazaar stores which the company wants to grow further by recasting the business soon, a senior official said.



The total size of the Indian apparel industry is Rs2.4 lakh crore. Of this,Rs1.62 lakh crore worth of garments is consumed in India and the rest is exported. India has also increased its imports from Bangladesh, one of the leading apparel making nations in the world.


Source:-economictimes.indiatimes.com





Mundra Overtakes Kandla To Emerge As India’S Largest Port

Ahmedabad: Mundra port, run by Adani Ports and Special Economic Zone Ltd (APSEZ), has emerged as the largest merchant port in India, overtaking the Union government-controlled Kandla Port by a whisker in terms of cargo handled in the first quarter of the current fiscal. It’s the first time that a private port has taken the top position.




Cargo handled by Adani port between April and June was close to 24 million tonnes (mt) as compared to about 23 mt handled by Kandla in the same period, said Rajeeva Sinha, whole-time director of APSEZ. “We are today the country’s largest port,” Sinha said. Both ports are located in the Kutch district of Gujarat.




An official at Kandla Port Trust confirmed the development. While Kandla was number one for the past five years, it appears that it is losing ground to Mundra because of the aggressive expansion and the risk-taking ability of the Adani group, said the official on condition of anonymity.

The Centre had set a target of 97 million tonnes per annum (mtpa) of cargo for Kandla port to handle this year while Mundra is likely to cross 100 mtpa mark, the official said.




Pipavav port in Gujarat in 1998 became the first private port in India to start operations, three years before Mundra. The two ports were part of the Gujarat government’s build, own, operate and transfer (BOOT) policy framed in 1995.

Most of Adani’s expansion and growth has come through in the past decade. The company invested about Rs.12,000 crore in this period for port development.




Mundra port’s cargo-handling capacity has been growing at 25% for the last five years on a year-on-year basis. Last year, Mundra became the country’s second-largest port by handling 82 mt, up from 64 mt in the previous year. In comparison, Kandla handled 93.6 mt of cargo, up from 82.5 mt.




Besides Kandla, which began operations in 1957, there are 12 other federal ports in the country, including the newly developed Port Blair in Andaman and Nicobar islands.




“While private ports have come into existence recently, major ports have been around for very long,” said Sajith Sreedharan, deputy managing director at BMT Consultants India that offers advisory services in the port and maritime sector. “Chennai port is 100 years old. There are a lot of bureaucratic hurdles for their expansion. Mundra’s success over Kandla shows the efficiency of a private port as compared to a government-run one.”




The turnaround time—a key yardstick of efficiency—is about two to three days at Kandla; it is less than one day at Mundra due to mechanization.

However, Kandla has one of the lowest tariffs in the world, which makes up for the time and money lost in berthing and unloading cargo, said the same Kandla Port Trust official quoted earlier.


Source:-www.livemint.com





Chemical Exports To Africa On The Rise

Africa is presenting a busy market for India's chemical exports as figures for Nigeria alone indicate considerable growth. Exports of chemical items from India to Nigeria alone have increased to about 5.6 percent from 2012 to 2013, according to the Chemical Export Promotion Council of India (ChemExcil).



In addition, total volume of exports to Nigeria this year amounted to $90.3 million as against $85.5 million last year, ChemExcil executive director Suhas Bhardi said at an exhibition that opened here with over 80 companies in attendance.



"The purpose of this Exhibition is to strengthen/expand existing business, promote india's chemical exports and to create a positive brand image of Indian products. This would also result in many more joint ventures and technology transfer," Bhardi said.



The Indian Chemical and Cosmetics Exhibition has been organised by ChemExcil in collaboration with the Pesticides Manufacturers and Formulators Association of India (PMFAI) and the Indian High Commission in Lagos.



The sector, which consists mainly of petrochemicals, accounts for over 70 percent of the total chemical market in Nigeria. "I am happy to note that the upstream petrochemical sector is well established as Nigeria is the highest oil-producer in Africa," Bhardi said.



PMFAI president Pradip Dave said the African region offered most potential for improvement in the productivity of crops and the African governments have therefore given priority to development of agriculture in the region.



Dave said that there was a good market for agrochemicals in Nigeria, adding that "it is estimated that the private sector agrochemical companies supply about 70 percent of the total CPP demand of approximately $120 million."



"Most of the African countries are now concentrating on development of irrigation projects and, with a modern irrigation system, by optimising and conserving water resources and also introducing drought resistance varieties. The drought resistance and high yielding varieties will definitely boost the agricultural production in the African region which will also help in boosting agricultural exports from Africa," he said.



ChemExcil's studies have shown that Nigerian companies consume in excess of $3.58 billion worth of chemicals per annum but produce just $380 million, an indication that the country is a potential market for the export of chemicals.



"The base chemical sectors, which consists mainly of petrochemicals, accounts for over 70 per cent of the total chemicals market in Nigeria. The upstream petrochemicals sector is well established as Nigeria is the highest oil producer in Africa," the council said on its website.



"Limited development of the downstream sector constrains growth of not only the base chemicals sector but also the total chemicals industry in Nigeria. In the speciality chemicals sector local manufacturing is focussed on paints, coatings and adhesives, using imported raw materials," it added.



For the remaining speciality chemical products, such as preservatives, water treatment and wood and textile treatment chemicals, local manufacture is limited. "The high operating costs as well as a lack of access to raw materials restrains the development of further manufacturing for a wider range of speciality chemicals," it said.



ChemExcil said, "Most regional and global speciality chemicals manufacturers supply raw materials and inputs to the local manufactures through distributors and also use the distributors to import fully manufactured speciality chemicals."



It has also identified a major market in essential oils flavours and fragrance/cosmetics/soaps and toiletries industry on the African continent.



"Africa's middle class has tripled in size in the last 30 years and is driving the continent's demand for cosmetics," it said.



"In Nigeria, cosmetics companies are racing for market share. While multinational brands dominate the market in Kenya and Uganda, and lack of capacity for local manufacturing remains an issue, local entrepreneurs are outsourcing manufacture and are using unique sales strategies."



After the Lagos exhibition, the ChemExil would move on to Addis-Ababa, Ethiopia, for a Buyer-Seller Meet and then to Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, July 23.


Source:-www.smetimes.in





How variation in interest rates alters the returns in debt funds

Every time there is a fall in the net asset value (NAV) of debt funds, there is renewed panic. The simple question in the investor's mind is: if there is no default and the fund is receiving its interest income, how and why should the NAV fall? A drop in the NAV of a debt fund can trigger alarm and lead to a precipitous closure for some, as happened in 2008. The market risks in mutual funds are not widely understood, leading to accusations that these should have been avoided somehow.

Investing in a debt fund is quite different from doing so in a bond or fixed deposit. In the case of a fixed deposit, the investor agrees to an unrealistic freeze in rupee return, in exchange for convenience and simplicity. The government no longer determines interest rates in our economy, nor are they dictated by powerful institutions. We have transitioned to a market for interest rates, and this market enables money to be lent and borrowed based on the needs and views of a large number of participants.


In such a market place, there are only prices and clearing. There is no right and wrong. If a borrower is willing to pay 8% for a year, and a lender agrees to it, the exchange of money is cleared at the agreed rate. The borrower needs the money; the lender has the money. The market just brings them together and enables the clearing. Alternatively, the borrower might be in the market today believing that the rates are set to rise and, therefore, wanting to borrow today; the lender might be in the market with a view that rates are set to fall and, therefore, eager to lend. We will never know the motivations, nor will we be able to identify why rates move up or down. At the end of the day, as long as everyone keeps their promise, we have a market where rates are determined efficiently and fairly.


When an investor chooses a bank deposit, he does not select the market. This is the reason he settles for a 4% rate on his savings bank account, while the bank itself would be lending its surplus balance for 8% in the call market. The bank is in the market for overnight funds, lending and borrowing as needed, while the saving bank depositor is standing out, content with a fixed rate. The market does not matter to this simple investor. He may get a lower or a higher rate. He is happy with a fixed rate and unwilling to look beyond.


What happens when such an investor chooses a debt fund? He simply steps into the market place for borrowing and lending. In this market, the rates change dynamically based on demand and supply and the views of various players. What is in the market is what he gets. This investor makes 9% on his liquid fund, when the money market rates are high; he makes 4% on his gilt funds, when the interest rates have risen; he makes 12% on his income fund, when credit spreads fall; and he makes 16% on his short-term fund, when rates correct sharply. Mutual funds are subject to market risk.


A debt fund also pools in money and creates a portfolio much like an equity fund, except that it buys debt securities issued by governments, banks and companies. If a five-year bond is issued at an interest of 10%, and the fund buys it, it earns this interest just like any other investor. However, since a debt fund is an open-ended product in which investors can come and go as they please, it accounts for the interest income on a daily basis. Therefore, the NAV of all debt funds will hold a component that represents this steady accrual income.





Misras have built a strong asset base, will achieve goals with ease


By Sakina Babwani, ET Bureau | 22 Jul, 2013, 08.00AM IST




Not all skewed portfolios need an immediate overhaul. When NitinMisra, a 40-year-old architect, contacted us for help, the financial planner did not alter the portfolio drastically even though it overtly favoured real estate. This is because Nitin has been a prudent planner, investing carefully to achieve his financial goals. While most advisers would be alarmed at a lopsided portfolio, SumeetVaid of Ffreedom Financial Planners did not recommend major changes as each of his investments is aligned to a goal. Besides, Nitin has built an extremely strong net worth of Rs 2.25 crore. With zero liabilities and a high income, the Misras have little to worry. Nitin lives in Delhi with his wife, Swati, 33, and six-year-old daughter, Nysa. A year after Nitin approached us, his finances are being reviewed by Vaid to check if the family is headed in the right direction.

The original plan


On considering the Misras' finances, it was clear that they would have a smooth sailing, given his asset base, a high income of Rs 97,000 a month, and a saving rate of a little more than 50%. Nitin was, however, advised to start a few fresh SIPs to achieve his goals. "My investment in real estate will work in my favour as it will help me build a good corpus to meet my post-retirement expenses," says Nitin. A year ago, his portfolio had 88% invested in real estate, 8% in equity and 4% in gold.


The Misras' goals were relatively simple, including a corpus of Rs 22 lakh for Nysa's education in 12 years, and Rs 44 lakh for her marriage in 22 years. For their own retirement, they would need Rs 4 crore in 16 years.


Our suggestions

Nitin did not require life insurance as he had a strong net worth that would take care of his family's needs in case of an emergency. Nitin's family would need Rs 1.5 crore to meet their future expenses and his current net worth is Rs 2.25 crore, of which Rs 1.9 crore will be readily available to the family. This does not include their primary residence. However, Nitin was advised to buy individual health plans of Rs 3 lakh for himself and his family as he had been relying only on a family floater plan of Rs 3 lakh, which would not have been sufficient.







Saturday, 20 July 2013

Sec. 234B interest couldn't be levied if entire income of NR was subjected to withholding tax

IT/ILT : When revenue did not dispute fact that amount received by assessee, a non-resident, was subjected to 100 per cent tax deduction at source and that there was no liability on assessee to pay advance tax, question of levy of interest under section 234B did not arise


Delay in filing an appeal due to lapse of applicant can’t be condoned

ST : Delays in filing appeal which are deliberate or which occur on account of lapses on part of applicant, do not deserve any sympathies


M/S. LORD CHLORO ALKALIES LTD. Vs. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF INCOME TAX (ADMN) AND ANR.











* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Reserved on: 04.07.2013
Pronounced on: 19.07.2013

+ W.P.(C) 1915/2013, C.M. APPL. 3645/2013

M/S LORD CHLORO ALKALIES LTD. ..... Petitioner
Through : Sh. J.P. Sengh, Sr. Advocate with
Ms. Vinita Sasidharan, Ms. Varsha Banerjee,
Sh. Sumeet Batra and Ms. Ankita Gupta,
Advocates.

versus

DIRECTOR GENERAL OF INCOME TAX (ADMN) AND
ANR. ..... Respondents
Through : Sh. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Sr.
Standing Counsel.

CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI


MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT

%

1. In these proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India, the petitioner challenges the orders of the Appellate Authority
for Industrial Reconstruction (hereafter "AAIFR") under provisions of
the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985
(hereafter "SICA") dated 01.04.2009 and 27.09.2012 in Appeal No.
227/2008. By that order, the AAIFR had set aside a scheme




W.P.(C) 1915/2013, C.M. APPL.3645/2013 Page 1
formulated under the SICA to the extent it dealt with waiver and
deduction of interest under provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
2. The Petitioner was incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956
on 1st March, 1979; it was originally named Modi Alkalies &
Chemicals Limited, which was subsequently changed to M/s Lord
Chloro Alkalies Ltd in the year 2003. It started commercial
production of caustic soda in 1994-95 with a capacity of 126 TPD
which was later enhanced to 195 TPD based on mercury cell
technology which was replaced by membrane cell technology in the
year 1994-95 with a further enhancement in its capacity to 255 TPD.
Till 1997-98 the Petitioner-company operated satisfactorily. Later, due
to adverse market conditions, change in government policy, high cost
of power, high cost of production and heavy interest burden, the
Petitioner started incurring heavy losses resulting in closure of its
operations. On 30.06.1999, in view of the colossal losses, the net
worth of the Petitioner eroded pursuant to which it made a reference
under Section 15(1) of SICA to the Board for Industrial Finance and
Reconstruction (hereafter "BIFR"); it was rejected in July 2001 as not
maintainable. Later, on 30.06.2000, the Petitioner filed another
reference before the BIFR based on its accounts. This time, it was
registered as Case No.308 of 2001. On 15.01.2002, BIFR declared that
the Petitioner was a sick company and directed IDBI to act as the
Operating Agency (OA).
3. Holding that no feasible rehabilitation proposals were
forthcoming from the Petitioner Company, BIFR by its order dated
19.08.2003 directed the OA to issue an advertisement for change of





W.P.(C) 1915/2013, C.M. APPL.3645/2013 Page 2
management (COM) as the offers received by the OA for COM did
not fructify. Taking these factors into account BIFR prima facie
concluded that it would be just, fair and in public interest that the
Company should be wound-up and show cause notice for Winding Up
should be issued to the Petitioner Company. By ex-parte order dated
02.06.2004, BIFR directed winding up of the Petitioner Company
under Section 20(1) of SICA and accordingly directed issuance of
Show Cause Notice (SCN) for Winding Up. Aggrieved by that order
of BIFR, the Petitioner filed an appeal being Appeal No. 154/ 2004.
4. During pendency of the said appeal, the first Respondent, i.e.
the Income Tax Department filed an application on 14.11.2005 under
Section 22(1) of SICA seeking permission to recover its dues of Rs.
997.79 lakhs with an alternative claim that in the event a scheme is
allowed to be formulated then a suitable provision for payment of
income tax dues of the Petitioner-Company ought to be made in the
scheme itself. It is stated that on 14.03.2006, during the pendency of
the appeal before BIFR, the Petitioner could settle the dues of all its
secured creditors (except IIBI, RIICO & UTI). The AAIFR, taking
note of the fact that the Petitioner, out of its 10 secured creditors
namely IDBI, ICICI, IFCI SBI, PNB, Syndicate Bank, Indian Bank,
IIBI, RIICO & UTI had already settled the dues of 7 creditors (except
IIBI, RIICO and UTI), by order dated 14.03.2006 allowed the appeal
and set aside the order (dated 02.06.2004) and remanded the matter
with a direction that a suitable provision for payment of income tax
dues amounting to Rs. 997.79 lakhs payable by the Petitioner ought to
be made in the rehabilitation scheme. By its order dated 22.09.2006,



W.P.(C) 1915/2013, C.M. APPL.3645/2013 Page 3
BIFR directed for circulation/publication of the Draft Rehabilitation
Scheme (DRS), in compliance with provisions of Section 18(3) of
SICA. The DRS was duly published. The BIFR after considering the
objections/suggestions of the secured creditors to the DRS sanctioned
the scheme on 30.11.2006; a copy of the sanctioned scheme was duly
sent by BIFR to the income tax authorities on 15.12.2006. The
petitioner states that by a separate letter, the sanctioning of the scheme
was brought to the notice of the income tax authorities on 27 th
February, 2007.
5. In September 2008, being aggrieved by the order (dated
30.11.2006 of BIFR), the Income Tax Department preferred a belated
appeal to AAIFR, (being Appeal No.227 of 2008) in respect of the
Income Tax reliefs and concessions provided in the Sanctioned
scheme in Paras 10.7(1), (2), (3) & (4). An accompanying application,
M.A. No.46 of 2009 for condoning the delay of two years was filed.
The appeal and application were objected to by the Petitioner. On
01.04.2009 by its interim order, AAIFR allowed the application for
condonation of delay and held that the first Respondent department
had no knowledge of the proceedings before the BIFR prior to
07.08.2008. The Petitioner had opposed the application and argued
that the Income Tax Department had in fact, given effect to clause
11.5 of the sanctioned scheme and waived the interest under Section
234B of Income Tax Act to the extent of Rs.2,47,34,779/- and interest
under Section 220(2) amounting to Rs.3,20,62,504/- in respect of the
Petitioner Company for assessment year 1996-1997. By the impugned
order, the AAIFR finally allowed the Income Tax Department's



W.P.(C) 1915/2013, C.M. APPL.3645/2013 Page 4
appeal and set aside Clause 11.5 of the published scheme, approved by
the BIFR.
6. The Petitioner argues, in its pleadings, and through the
submissions of its senior counsel, Shri J.P.Sengh, that the impugned
order is not sustainable in law. It is pointed out that the finding
regarding the order (of AAIFR) having been made in contravention of
principles of natural justice is contrary to facts. It was argued in this
regard that the letter of 30.09.2009 of the concerned assessing officer
of the Income Tax Department itself shows that the Respondents were
aware of the BIFR's orders, and accepted them without demur. The
said letter reads as follows:

"Order to give effect to the decision of the BIFR u/Ss 22
& 32 of the SICA Act 1985 Dated : 30-9-2009

The Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction,
New Delhi in Case No. 308/2001 in the case of M/s Lords
Chloro Alkalies Ltd. Dated 13.12.2006 has passed the
order as per para 11.5 which is as under:

"The statutory liabilities which are under
litigation/appeal shall on crystallization after
exercise of all the legal remedies available to the
company be paid over a period of seven years on
interest free basis. All the penal interest, damages,
penalties, charges are chargeable on the same
shall be waived."

The Hon'ble ITAT, Jaipur in its decision in appeal
no.199/JP/2000 and 210/JP/2000 dated 19.02.2008 set
aside the decision before the ld. CIT(A), Alwar in view of
the decision passed by the BIFR for fresh adjudication de
novo in the assessment year 1996-97.




W.P.(C) 1915/2013, C.M. APPL.3645/2013 Page 5
To give effect to the decision of BIFR, the interest
u/s 234B amounting to Rs.2,47,34,779/- and interest u/s
220(2) amounting to Rs. 3,20,62,504/- waived by the
BIFR is hereby reduced from the arrear demand against
the M/s. Modi Alkalies & Chemicals Ltd., Alwar."

Learned senior counsel also relied on the order of the CIT (Appeals)
dated 4th March, 2011, especially Paras 31 and 32, to say that the
determination of BIFR was accepted, and directions contained in its
order were implemented. Consequently argued counsel, the Income
Tax authorities should not have made a grievance of the BIFR
scheme. The consequential order of the assessing officer, dated
29.03.2011, reducing the demands, in line with the order of BIFR was
relied on. The said order reads as follows:
"Consequent to order of Ld.CIT(A), Alwar of AY 1999-
97, a demand has been reduced to Rs.2,87,17,062/- after
appeal effect.
As per order of BIFR, you are required to make the
payment of above demand in seven installments.
Accordingly, it is requested to pay Rs.41,02,437/(1/7th of
Rs. 2,87,17,062/-) by 31.03.2011 positively.

Please note in the event of non-response the above
mentioned demand will be recovered by adopting
coercive measures."

7. It is argued on behalf of the Petitioner that in the above
circumstances, the Income Tax authorities were estopped and bound
by the principle of waiver from contending that the orders of the BIFR
were not binding upon them. Counsel further emphasised that the




W.P.(C) 1915/2013, C.M. APPL.3645/2013 Page 6
order of BIFR had been worked out and the benefits of both in respect
of the income tax concessions as well as the other benefits mandated
under the rehabilitation scheme had been implemented. In these
circumstances, contended learned senior counsel, it would be unjust
and inequitable to set aside the order of BIFR on an erroneous
interpretation of law and mistaken view of the facts.
8. Learned Counsel next argued that in terms of Section 32 of the
Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985, overriding
effect has been given to the orders of BIFR and schemes of
rehabilitation which are otherwise legally valid.
9. On behalf of the official respondents, it is argued by Shri.
Sanjeev Sabharwal, learned Standing Counsel, that the income tax
authorities were completely in the dark about the nature of the scheme
finalised by BIFR. It was argued that after the previous order of
remand by the AAIFR, a duty had been cast upon the BIFR to
circulate the draft scheme to it i.e. the income tax authorities. There
was no material on the record to suggest that such an obligation had
been fulfilled.
10. More substantially, learned Standing Counsel argued that the
provisions of SICA could not prevail over those of the Income Tax
Act. In this context, it was argued that in terms of the decision of the
Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income tax v Anjum. M.H.
Ghaswala & Ors. (2002) 1 SCC 633 it was held that the interest
contemplated under Sections 234A, 234B and 234C is mandatory in
nature and the power of waiver or reduction, having not been
expressly conferred on the Settlement Commission, waiver or



W.P.(C) 1915/2013, C.M. APPL.3645/2013 Page 7
reduction in payment of statutory interest is outside the purview of the
settlement proceedings, contemplated in Chapter XIX-A of the Act. It
was submitted that likewise, since no provision of SICA enabled
waiver or reduction of statutory interest mandated by the Act, BIFR
could not have unilaterally directed such a relief. In this respect,
contended Learned Standing Counsel, the sole repository of the power
to grant a waiver or reduction of interest rates or amounts was the
Board of Direct Taxes, under Section 119 (2) of the Income Tax Act.
Reliance was also placed on Board Circular No. 400/234-95/IT (B)
which has specified the authorities entitled to consider the question of
waiver of interest and such other relief. It was submitted that in the
present case, the assessing officers and Commissioners had
unilaterally, and without reference to the Board, and its circulars,
which they were bound to respect, given effect to the orders of the
BIFR.
11. The broad and brief facts necessary to decide this petition are
not in dispute. The company was declared sick; when a reference was
made, BIFR circulated the draft rehabilitation scheme with the broad
acceptance of the company's secured creditors. At th at stage, the
income tax authorities were in the know of the scheme. During the
pendency of an appeal to the AAIFR, the Income Tax Commissioner
had preferred an application, on 14.11.2005. In that application, the
following reliefs were claimed:

"1) the Deptt may be granted permission u/s 22(1) of
SICA to recover its dues of Rs. 976.79 lakhs as intimated
by the company.



W.P.(C) 1915/2013, C.M. APPL.3645/2013 Page 8
2) If a scheme is being directed to be formulated,
provision may be directed to be kept in that revival
scheme for the payment of I.T. dues of Rs. 976.79 lakhs
on priority basis.

3) Taking cognizance of Section 281 of the I.T.Act, 1961
the Deptt may be given priority in the matter of recovery
of Rs. 976.79 lakhs. In the event, a scheme is allowed to
be formulated the 1.T.dues of Rs. 976.79 Iakhs may be
given due priority for payment over other dues.

XXXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXX"

The AAIFR, while disposing of the appeal, took note of the claims of
the Income Tax Department, and directed as follows, in its order dated
14.03.2006:

"XXXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXX

Given this context we set aside the impugned order
and remand the case to the BIFR. We also direct the
company and the OA severally to ensure that a fully tied
up revival scheme is presented to the BIFR not later than
60 days of this order. If in the meanwhile negotiations
cannot be completed with IIBI, RIICO and UTI then the
scheme may provide that their dues will be settled by the
company/ promoters separately. One Trivedi & Sons who
is an unsecured creditor and had appeared before us has
some dues from the company which should be taken care
of in an appropriate manner in the scheme itself. Income
Tax Authorities in a separate application dated 14th Nov.
2005 have filed an application seeking permission under
Section 22(1) of SICA to recover its dues of 997.79 lakhs.

XXXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXX"

The BIFR scheme complied with this direction, and expressly






W.P.(C) 1915/2013, C.M. APPL.3645/2013 Page 9
provided that "The statutory liabilities which are under
litigation/appeal shall on crystallization after exercise of all the legal
remedies available to the company be paid over a period of seven
years on interest free basis. All the penal interest, damages, penalties,
charges are chargeable on the same shall be waived."

12. The first question is whether the income tax authorities are
justified in stating that the order of BIFR, to the extent that it scaled
down interest (on income tax liability) are beyond jurisdiction, since
only the Board through its designate has the authority to waive or
remit interest under the Income Tax wholly or in part. The petitioner
in this context, relies on Section 32 of SICA; it reads as follows:

"32. Effect of the Act on other laws.-- (1) The provisions
of this Act and of any rules or schemes made there under
shall have effect notwithstanding anything inconsistent
therewith contained in any other law except the
provisions of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973
(46 of 1973) and the Urban Land (Ceiling and
Regulation) Act, 1976 (33 of 1976) for the time being in
force or in the Memorandum or Articles of Association of
an industrial company or in any other instrument having
effect by virtue of any law other than this Act.

(2) Where there has been under any scheme under this
Act an amalgamation of a sick industrial company with
another company, the provisions of section 72A of the
Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), shall, subject to the
modifications that the power of the Central Government
under that section may be exercised by the Board without
any recommendation by the specified authority referred
to in that section, apply in relation to such amalgamation
as they apply in relation to the amalgamation of a




W.P.(C) 1915/2013, C.M. APPL.3645/2013 Page 10
company owning an industrial undertaking with another
company."

The decision of the Supreme Court in Anjum M.H. Ghaswala (supra)
is no doubt an authority for the proposition that interest waiver cannot
be granted to anyone except those specified in the Income Tax Act.
However, the court did not have any occasion to deal with provisions
of SICA, or their interface with provisions and orders under the
Income Tax Act.

13. One well recognized principle of statutory construction is that
when courts have to deal with conflicting or inconsistent laws, or
inconsistent provisions of two separate enactments, the first approach
should be to attempt at harmonization of the two provisions, to avoid,
or minimize the conflict. The second line of approach is to see which
of the two laws is a general law. A prior special law will prevail over a
later and general law. This is more so, when the prior law contains a
non-obstante clause (R.S. Raghunath vs State Of Karnataka And Anr
AIR 1992 SC 81; Allahabad Bank v. Canara Bank & Anr. (2000) 4
SCC 406). The tenor and express provisions of Section 32 of SICA,
in the opinion of this court, leave no doubt that the provisions of SICA
are to prevail, except to the extent excluded. The immunity, or
exception from, the non obstante clause, is limited to the provisions of
enactments referred, of the enactments referred. The specific reference
to Foreign Exchange Regulation Act and Urban Land Ceiling Act in
Sectin 32 (1) and to Section 72-A of the Income Tax Act, mean that




W.P.(C) 1915/2013, C.M. APPL.3645/2013 Page 11
those provisions will stand excluded from the rigors of Section 32 of
SICA.

14. A somewhat similar question had been considered by the
Supreme Court in Aswini Kumar Ghosh & Anr v. Arabinda Bose &
Anr, [1953] SCR 1, when it was observed that - "It should first be
ascertained what the enacting part of the section provides on a fair
construction of the words used according to their natural and
ordinary meaning, and the non obstante clause is to be understood as
operating to set aside as no longer valid anything contained in
relevant existing laws which is inconsistent with the new enactment."
In the case of Section 32 SICA, the specific exclusion of two
enactments, and the express reference to Section 72A of the Income
Tax Act, to say that its provisions apply (by Section 32 (2)) manifest
Parliamentary intention that provisions of SICA have to prevail over
those of the Income Tax Act. This court's conclusion is strengthened
by precedent. In http://indiankanoon.org/doc/366360/ Mewar Sugar
Mills Ltd. v. Chairman, Central Board of Direct Taxes & Anr 1998
VI AD(DELHI) 309 a Division Bench had concluded that:

"21. To sum up:

(1) The non obstinate clause contained in sub-section (1)
of Section 32 of SICA does not give the SICA a blanket
overriding effect on all other laws; the overriding effect
is given to the provisions of SICA, rules or schemes made
thereunder only to the extent of inconsistency therewith
contained in any other law excepting a few exceptions
enumerated therein.




W.P.(C) 1915/2013, C.M. APPL.3645/2013 Page 12
(2) Exempting from and suspending the operation of the
provisions contained in Section 41 of the Income-tax Act,
1961 as regards a sick industry amounts to 'sacrifice
from the Central Govt.'- the expression as used in Section
19(1) of SICA.

(3) It is for the BIFR to form an opinion while framing a
scheme of rehabilitation for a sick industry whether an
exemption from operation of S 41 of the Income-Tax Act,
1961 is required to be engrafted in the scheme so as to
secure the object of rehabilitation and if so then to what
extent. If the BIFR may form an opinion in favour of
grant of such exemption then the same amounts to
'financial assistance' from the Central Govt to the extent
of the sick industry having been exempted from the
operation of Section 41 of the Income-tax Act."

This court also notices that a similar view has been expressed by the
Bombay High Court in Vadilal Dairy International Ltd v. State of
Maharashtra 2009 (1) Comp. LJ 466 (Bom).

15. The next issue is whether the revenue is correct in saying that
by virtue of Section 119 of the Income Tax Act, and circulars issued
under that enactment, the Board of Direct Taxes' views have primacy
over that of BIFR. Section 119 reads as follows:

"119. Instructions to subordinate authorities

(1) The Board may, from time to time, issue such orders,
instructions and directions to other income- tax
authorities as it may deem fit for the proper
administration of this Act, and such authorities and all
other persons employed in the execution of this Act shall
observe and follow such orders, instructions and
directions of the Board: Provided that no such orders,
instructions or directions shall be issued-



W.P.(C) 1915/2013, C.M. APPL.3645/2013 Page 13
(a) so as to require any income- tax authority to make a
particular assessment or to dispose of a particular case
in a particular manner; or

(b) so as to interfere with the discretion of the Deputy
Commissioner (Appeals) or the Commissioner (Appeals)]
in the exercise of his appellate functions.

(2) Without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing
power,-

(a) the Board may, if it considers it necessary or
expedient so to do, for the purpose of proper and efficient
management of the work of assessment and collection of
revenue, issue, from time to time whether by way of
relaxation of any of the provisions of sections 5[ 139],
143, 144, 147, 148, 154, 155, 6[ sub- section (1A) of
section 201, sections 210, 211, 7[ 234A, 234B], 234C],
271 and 273 or otherwise, general or special orders in
respect of any class of incomes or class of cases, setting
forth directions or instructions (not being prejudicial to
assessees) as to the guidelines, principles or procedures
to be followed by other income- tax authorities in the
work relating to assessment or collection of revenue or
the initiation of proceedings for the imposition of
penalties and any such order may, if the Board is of
opinion that it is necessary in the public interest so to do,
be published and circulated in the prescribed manner for
general information;

(b) the Board may, if it considers it desirable or
expedient so to do for avoiding genuine hardship in any
case or class of cases, by general or special order,
authorise 8[ any income- tax authority, not being a
Deputy Commissioner (Appeals) or Commissioner
(Appeals)] to admit an application or claim for any
exemption, deduction, refund or any other relief under




W.P.(C) 1915/2013, C.M. APPL.3645/2013 Page 14
this Act after the expiry of the period specified by or
under this Act for making such application or claim and
deal with the same on merits in accordance with law.

(c) the Board may, if it considers it desirable or expedient
so to do for avoiding genuine hardship in any case or
class of cases, by general or special order for reasons to
be specified therein, relax any requirement contained in
any of the provisions of Chapter IV or Chapter VIA,
where the assessee has failed to comply with any
requirement specified in such provision for claiming
deduction thereunder, subject to the following conditions,
namely:-

(i) the default in complying with such requirement was
due to circumstances beyond the control of the assessee;
and

(ii) the assessee has complied with such requirement
before the completion of assessment in relation to the
previous year in which such deduction is claimed:
Provided that the Central Government shall cause every
order issued under this clause to be laid before each
House of Parliament.

(3) Every Income- tax Officer employed in the execution
of this Act shall observe and follow such instructions as
may be issued to him for his guidance by the Director of
Inspection or by the Commissioner or by the Inspecting
Assistant Commissioner within whose jurisdiction he
performs his functions."

16. In pursuance of the above provision, the Central Board of Direct
Taxes had withdrawn previous circulars, and in its Circular No. 683
dated 08.06.1994, required that the nodal authority for coordinating
between BIFR and the Central Board was the Director General
(Administration). This was sought to be highlighted by counsel for the



W.P.(C) 1915/2013, C.M. APPL.3645/2013 Page 15
revenue. This court has no doubt about the proposition. However, the
blanket submission that when the circular under Section 119 is
ignored, and a scheme is given effect to by income tax authorities
themselves, the BIFR's order or scheme is void, cannot be
countenanced. There is no material on record to suggest such a
conclusion. The Income Tax authorities in this case were aware in the
earlier round, about the reference and possibility of a scheme; they
requested for provision to recover their dues. The AAIFR specifically
remitted the matter to BIFR to consider this aspect, which it did.
Although the income tax authorities were not given notice, the order
of BIFR reveals that it applied its mind, and granted limited
concession only as regards reduction and waiver of interest. The larger
pleas of the company towards income tax dues and concessions were
denied by the BIFR. Having regard to these circumstances, and
Section 32 of the Act as well as the Circular No. 683 of 1994 under
the Income Tax Act, the failure of income tax authorities to inform the
Director General (since the Circular was in existence at the time of
formulation of the scheme in the present case) would not result in the
invalidity of BIFR's scheme. Another aspect which this court notices
is that the Income Tax authorities, i.e. the assessing officer and the
Commissioner, have given effect to the orders of BIFR. These were
pursuant to the orders of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT)
dated 19.02.2008. That order stands and has attained finality. Besides,
the period for operation of the limited concessions in the scheme has
also apparently ended. Lastly, in view of the concurrence of the other
secured creditors, and implementation of the approved scheme, it



W.P.(C) 1915/2013, C.M. APPL.3645/2013 Page 16
would be inequitable and unjust to put the clock back, at the behest of
the Income Tax authorities.

17. In view of the above discussion, the writ petition is entitled to
succeed. The impugned orders of AAIFR dated 01.04-2009 and
27.09.2012 in Appeal No. 227/2008 are hereby quashed. The orders of
BIFR sanctioning the scheme, on 30th November, 2006 are hereby
restored. The writ petition is allowed in these terms; there shall be no
order as to costs.


S. RAVINDRA BHAT
(JUDGE)




NAJMI WAZIRI
(JUDGE)

JULY 19, 2013




W.P.(C) 1915/2013, C.M. APPL.3645/2013 Page 17

No concealment penalty if search was initiated and concluded in the relevant previous year

IT: No penalty can be levied under section 271(1)(c) for concealment of income, where search was completed before end of relevant previous year


Anticipated loss in an outstanding repurchase transaction isn’t a notional loss; ITAT allows deducti

IT: Anticipated loss in outstanding repurchase transactions is actual and real and not a notional loss


Pre-deposit order must be communicated in writing

ST : Oral direction to make pre-deposit passed during course of personal hearing is not envisaged under section 37C of Central Excise Act and is invalid; any such direction must be passed in writing and communication as per section 37C ibid


A person performing back office services for an insurance co. can't be termed as an insurance agent

ST/ECJ : A person performing back office activities for insurance companies viz., handling applications, issuing policies, etc. cannot be regarded as an insurance agent and is not covered by reverse charge under rule 2(1)(d)(i)(A) of Service Tax Rules, 1994


Customs Notification No 77/2013 (NT) dated 19-07-2013

Government of India

Ministry of Finance

Department of Revenue


Notification no. 77 /2013-Customs (N.T.)


New Delhi, the 19th July, 2013


G.S.R. No. (E) – In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-rule (1) of Rule 3 of the Customs Tariff (Transitional Product Specific Safeguard Duty) Rules, 2002 and in supersession of notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) No. 33/2013-Customs (N.T.) issued vide G.S.R. No. 199 (E) dated the 2nd April, 2013 , the Central Government hereby appoints Sh. Ram Tirath as the Director General (Specific Safeguard) for the purposes of the said Rules.




[F. No. 528/89/2012-STO (TU)]


(M.V. Vasudevan)

Under Secretary to the Government of India


Customs Notification No 78/2013 (NT) dated 19-07-2013

Government of India

Ministry of Finance

Department of Revenue


Notification no. 78 /2013-Customs (N.T.)


New Delhi, the 19th July, 2013


G.S.R. No. (E) – In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-rule (1) of Rule 3 of the Customs Tariff (Identification and Assessment of Safeguard Duty) Rules, 1997 and in supersession of notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) No. 34/2013-Customs (N.T.) issued vide G.S.R. No. 200 (E) dated the 2nd April, 2013 , the Central Government hereby appoints Sh. Ram Tirath as the Director General (Safeguard) for the purposes of the said Rules.




[F. No. 528/89/2012-STO (TU)]


(M.V. Vasudevan)

Under Secretary to the Government of India


Customs Circular No 26/2013 dated 19-07-2013

Government of India

Ministry of Finance

Department of Revenue

(Central Board of Excise and Customs)


Circular No. 26 /2013 -Customs


227- B, North Block, New Delhi

Dated 19.07.2013


To,


All Chief Commissioners of Customs/Customs (Preventive)

All Chief Commissioners of Customs and Central Excise

All Commissioners of Customs / Customs (Preventive)

All Commissioners of Central Excise and Customs

All Directors General under CBEC.


Sir / Madam,


Subject: Standard Unit Quantity Code (UQC) - regarding.


The issue of poor quality of trade data has been engaging the attention of the Government. Further, an analysis of National Import Data Base (NIDB) reveals that there are at times variations between the lowest and highest unit values of the same item, which might escape detection on account of the use of different unit codes.



  1. The matter has been carefully examined with the objective of improving data quality both from the view point of generating error free trade statistics as well as providing usable contemporary reference values to the assessing officers. The Board notes that Standard Unit Quantity Codes (UQC) indicated in the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 are not being uniformly declared by importers and exporters for the same items across different Customs locations. This impacts data quality and makes comparisons and aggregations difficult. The use of non-uniform UQCs for the same item also vitiates the quality of the NIDB data and reduces its utility to the assessing officers, who are unable to ascertain the contemporaneous values or assessment practice of a given item in different Customs locations. Therefore, the solution lies in improving the quality of data by using standard UQCs.

  2. In this regard, it is seen that the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 prescribes only a single Unit Quantity Code (UQC) against each Tariff Item, and it is the requirement of the law that the same is properly declared by importers/exporters/Customs Brokers in the Bills of Entry/Shipping Bills. It is the view that the correct declaration of the UQC, as indicated in the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 would resolve the aforementioned difficulties. Accordingly, it is directed by the Board that Customs field formations should ensure that only the correct and prescribed Standard UQC as per the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 is mentioned in Bills of Entry/ Shipping Bills.

  3. Board desires the Chief Commissioners of Customs to ensure that instructions as aforementioned are complied with scrupulously. There should, however, be an endeavour that the exercise does not result in delays in clearance of cargo. The Directorate of Valuation shall monitor the correct use of UQCs and DG (System) shall modify the software applications suitably to give effect to mandatory compliance of correct UQC.

  4. Difficulty faced, if any, in implementation of aforementioned instructions may be brought to the notice of the Board.




Yours faithfully


(R.P. Singh)

Director (Customs)

F. No. 450/180/2009-
Cus. IV


AO can’t refer to CPWD rates to compute construction cost unless such rates are in conformity with s

IT: Unless there are similarities in rates of CPWD and State PWD, it is not proper to adopt CPWD rates for arriving at cost of construction


AAR can only determine tax liability of applicant and not any of its affiliate or AOP

IT : The Authority (AAR) can't give a ruling that the applicant is not liable to be taxed and somebody else is liable to be taxed. The proposed question framed by AAR for determination can only relate to applicant's tax liability. It would be impermissible for AAR to determine tax liability of person other than the applicant