Order of CIT was erroneous as sums payable to customer was mistakenly considered as income of assess

IT : Where Commissioner came to conclusion that assessee incurred work in progress expenditure of Rs. 47.59 crores and raised a bill of Rs. 48.06 crores and difference between two was profit, whereas assessee submitted that amount of Rs. 48.06 crores was bill amount raised by customers, Commissioner proceeded on misunderstood facts and accordingly revision order could not be sustained