Complaint for cheque bouncing couldn't be quashed after conclusion of evidences before Trial Court

Negotiable Instruments Act: Where in a complaint under section 138 evidence had already been concluded before trial Court and there was specific averment in complaint that on representation of petitioner and other co-accused MOU was signed, mere fact that cheque issued by accused and MOU signed by accused did not bear signature of petitioner made out no case for quashing of complaint and summoning order against petitioner