Authority for Advance Rulings not throw out application on mere technicalities
Saturday, 21 March 2015
RBI announces enhanced transparency disclosure requirements on sale of NPAs to Securitisation Cos.
BANKING/SARFAESI : Guidelines on sale of Financial Assets to Securitisation Company/Reconstruction Company and related issues
No penalty/interest can be imposed when surplus input-tax credit is sufficient to adjust reassessed
CST & VAT : Gujarat VAT - Where Assessing Authority made reassessment and raised tax demand upon assessee and also imposed penalty and interest upon it, since assessee had surplus balance of input tax credit, which had been adjusted against demand of tax upon reassessment, there was no element of avoidance of tax
ITAT deletes TP adjustment in case of 'Philips India' as DRP had passed non-speaking order
IT/ILT : Where DRP confirmed adjustment made to assessee's ALP by passing a non-speaking order, same was to be set aside and matter was to be remanded back for disposal afresh
CESTAT upholds appellate order giving correct conclusion even though for inadequate reasons
Service Tax : Where conclusion of Commissioner (Appeals) denying exemption to assessee was found to be correct, said order was to be upheld though there may be inadequate reasons for said conclusion, as appeal was against conclusion
Profit on sale of shares held as capital gains as shares were held by assessee for investment purpos
IT : Where assessee-company held shares as long term investment, profit on sale of share was to be treated as long term capital gain and not as business income; assessee was entitled for exemption under section 10(38)
'Gutkha' being an unclassified item was liable to trade tax at 10%
CST & VAT: U.P. VAT - Where assessee was engaged in manufacture of gutkha and it claimed that no tax was leviable on sale of gutkha made during period 1-4-2001 to 31-8-2001, gutkha was an unclassified item liable to be taxed at rate of 10 per cent
Appeal filed before HC against order of CLB was to be dismissed in absence of any question of law
CL: Where findings of fact recorded by CLB were based on acquisition of evidence made available before them by parties, appeal was to be dismissed as there was no question of law
Input tax credit couldn't be reversed due to default of seller in complying with VAT procedures
CST & VAT : Tamil Nadu VAT - Where assessee purchased goods after payment of input tax and availed input tax credit on such purchases, input tax credit could not have been reversed on grounds that selling dealers had not filed returns or not paid taxes or they were unregistered dealers or their registrations were retrospectively cancelled
Exp. on replacement of part of plant couldn't be capitalized if it was allowed as revenue exp. in ea
IT : Where expenses incurred for replacement in membrane cells - I plant was treated as revenue expenditure in earlier assessment years, same could not be treated as capital expenditure in relevant assessment year without any valid reason
Deptt couldn't make additions on pretext of excise duty evasion without proving that turnover was un
CST & VAT : Rajasthan VAT - Where Assessing Authority made addition of Rs. 2.94 lakhs in turnover of assessee on ground that Excise Department had found assessee liable for evasion of excise duty on said amount, since department had not discharged burden of proof to establish from any enquiry or otherwise that assessee had under-assessed its turnover, impugned addition was not justified
Fresh inputs used to remark defective finished products are also eligible for credit, says Delhi CES
Excise & Customs : Where returned duty-paid defective goods have been re-made/repaired/refining and cleared on payment of duty, even fresh inputs used in process of repairing/refining are eligible for credit and rule 16 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 does not bar said credit
CLB couldn't adjudicate upon bona-fide dispute of creditor's claim, petitioner to seek remedy under
CL: Where a company raises a bonafide dispute with regard to claim of its creditor, company court will not adjudicate such disputed claim and appropriate remedy for company would be to avail common law remedies for recovery of alleged debts due to them
Assessee would be entitled to compensation and not interest on interest for delay in tax refund
IT: In case of delay in granting refund, assessee would be entitled to compensation and interest can be awarded by way of compensation, but assessee would not be entitled to further compensation by way of interest on such interest, which is awarded as compensation
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)